• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《父亲产后依恋量表(韩文版)的有效性和可靠性》。

Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2023 May;17(2):102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.003
PMID:37004880
Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to translate the Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale (PPAS) into Korean and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the PPAS (K-PPAS).

METHODS

The PPAS was translated, back-translated, and reviewed by 12 experts and 5 fathers following the World Health Organization's guideline. A convenience sample of 396 fathers with infants in their first 12 months participated in this study. For construct validity, an underlying factor structure and model fit was assessed with an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity and reliability of the K-PPAS were evaluated.

RESULTS

The construct validity of the K-PPAS with 11 items was identified by two-factor structures: healthy attachment relationship, and patience and tolerance. The final model fit was shown acceptable with the normed chi-square = 1.94, comparative fit index = .94, Tucker-Lewis index = .92, root mean square error of approximation = .07, and standardized root mean square residual = .06. This model had acceptable convergent and discriminant validity for each construct with the values of the composite reliability and heterotrait-monotrait ratio at a satisfactory level. Discriminant validity with known groups showed that fathers with no postnatal depression had significantly higher scores on the K-PPAS than those with postnatal depression. Cronbach's α and McDonald's omega coefficient of the K-PPAS was .84 and .83.

CONCLUSIONS

The K-PPAS would be beneficial to measure postnatal attachment among fathers with infants aged 12 months or younger in Korea. However, further studies are suggested to evaluate the applicability of the scale considering the various family structures, such as single or foster parents and multicultural families that exist within the Korean population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将父爱产后依恋量表(PPAS)翻译为韩语,并评估 PPAS 韩语版(K-PPAS)的效度和信度。

方法

根据世界卫生组织的指南,PPAS 经过翻译、回译和 12 位专家和 5 位父亲的审查。本研究采用方便抽样法,共招募了 396 名婴儿出生后 12 个月内的父亲。为了评估结构效度,采用探索性和验证性因子分析评估潜在的因子结构和模型拟合度。评估了 K-PPAS 的聚合效度、区分效度和信度。

结果

具有 11 个项目的 K-PPAS 的结构效度由两个因子结构确定:健康的依恋关系和耐心与宽容。最终模型的拟合度为可接受的,标准化卡方值为 1.94,比较拟合指数为 0.94,塔克-刘易斯指数为 0.92,近似均方根误差为 0.07,标准化均方根残差为 0.06。该模型对每个结构的聚合效度和异质同质比的判别效度均为可接受水平,复合可靠性和异质同质比的判别效度在可接受水平。与已知群体的判别效度表明,无产后抑郁的父亲在 K-PPAS 上的得分显著高于产后抑郁的父亲。K-PPAS 的克朗巴赫 α 和麦克唐纳 ω 系数分别为 0.84 和 0.83。

结论

K-PPAS 可用于评估韩国 12 个月或以下婴儿的父亲的产后依恋情况。然而,考虑到韩国人群中存在的各种家庭结构,如单身或养父母和多元文化家庭,建议进一步研究评估该量表的适用性。

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale.《父亲产后依恋量表(韩文版)的有效性和可靠性》。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2023 May;17(2):102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
2
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of The Resilience Scale for Kidney Transplantation (RS-KTPL) in a Chinese population.肾移植复原力量表(RS-KTPL)在中国人群中的跨文化调适与验证
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 8;20(7):e0327035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327035. eCollection 2025.
5
Translation and Validation of Post-Dialysis Fatigue Scale Among Vietnamese Patients With Hemodialysis.越南血液透析患者透析后疲劳量表的翻译与验证
J Ren Care. 2025 Sep;51(3):e70025. doi: 10.1111/jorc.70025.
6
Transcultural Adaptation, Validation, Psychometric Analysis, and Interpretation of the 22-Item Thai Senior Technology Acceptance Model for Mobile Health Apps: Cross-Sectional Study.22项泰国移动健康应用老年人技术接受模型的跨文化调适、验证、心理测量分析及解读:横断面研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Mar 11;8:e60156. doi: 10.2196/60156.
7
Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health.改善父母和婴儿心理健康的亲子心理治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 8;1(1):CD010534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010534.pub2.
8
Validation of the Perceived Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence (PEDIA) Scale Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender and Nonbinary Persons: Cross-Sectional Study.男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他与男性发生性关系者、跨性别者和非二元性别者中抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性感知障碍量表(PEDIA)的验证:横断面研究
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2025 Jun 27;11:e67005. doi: 10.2196/67005.
9
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study.护士群体中韩国版生育力保留障碍量表的心理测量学特性:一项方法学研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jul 10;10(9):100275. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100275. eCollection 2023 Sep.