Suppr超能文献

护士群体中韩国版生育力保留障碍量表的心理测量学特性:一项方法学研究。

Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study.

作者信息

An Hae Jeong, Kim Yoonjung

机构信息

College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

College of Nursing, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jul 10;10(9):100275. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100275. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Oncofertility Barrier Scale (K-OBS).

METHODS

This methodological study investigated the validity and reliability of the K-OBS for measuring barriers to oncofertility care among nurses. A total of 270 nurses who had experience in rendering nursing care to cancer survivors were recruited, and the instrument was translated, assessed for content validity, and tested using a preliminary survey. Construct validity was established through explanatory factor analysis. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were analyzed using a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrix. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega.

RESULTS

The K-OBS demonstrated satisfactory validity and reliability, with seven factors, including 27 items explaining 60.42% of the total variance, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86, and a McDonald's omega of 0.83. The seven factors were labeled, "Lack of information and education" (8 items), "Rigid thinking toward oncofertility care" (5 items), "Cancer patient stereotypes" (4 items), "Insufficient support" (4 items), "Desire for fertility preservation" (2 items), "Interrupted oncofertility care" (2 items), and "Fertility risk" (2 items).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that the K-OBS may be a suitable instrument with acceptable validity and reliability for evaluating barriers to oncofertility among Korean nurses. This instrument can be used to identify obstacles that make oncofertility care difficult, thereby contributing to new insights for improving the future quality of oncofertility care in Korea.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验韩国版肿瘤生育障碍量表(K - OBS)的心理测量特性。

方法

本方法学研究调查了K - OBS在测量护士对肿瘤生育护理障碍方面的有效性和可靠性。共招募了270名有护理癌症幸存者经验的护士,对该工具进行翻译、内容效度评估,并通过初步调查进行测试。通过解释性因子分析确定结构效度。使用多特质多方法(MTMM)矩阵分析聚合效度和区分效度。使用克朗巴赫α系数和麦克唐纳ω系数评估信度。

结果

K - OBS显示出令人满意的效度和信度,有七个因子,包括27个项目,解释了总方差的60.42%,克朗巴赫α系数为0.86,麦克唐纳ω系数为0.83。这七个因子分别被标记为“信息和教育不足”(8个项目)、“对肿瘤生育护理的僵化思维”(5个项目)、“癌症患者刻板印象”(4个项目)、“支持不足”(4个项目)、“生育保留愿望”(2个项目)、“肿瘤生育护理中断”(2个项目)和“生育风险”(2个项目)。

结论

本研究结果表明,K - OBS可能是一种效度和信度可接受的合适工具,用于评估韩国护士在肿瘤生育方面的障碍。该工具可用于识别使肿瘤生育护理困难的障碍,从而为提高韩国未来肿瘤生育护理质量提供新的见解。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the oncofertility barriers scales among nurses: A methodological study.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jul 10;10(9):100275. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100275. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Revision and psychometric evaluation of a fertility intention scale for young women with breast cancer in Chinese Mainland.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Jun 21;10(9):100264. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100264. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale.
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2023 May;17(2):102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(12):7244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127244.
10
Validation of the Korean Version of Patient-Centered Care Tool: For Outpatients.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jun 29;17:1525-1540. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S411109. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Paternal Postnatal Attachment Scale.
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2023 May;17(2):102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
2
Barriers to Oncofertility Care among Female Adolescent Cancer Patients in Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 3;29(3):1583-1593. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030133.
4
Individualised Care Scale-Nurse: Construct validity and internal consistency of the Spanish version.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Jun;36(2):404-415. doi: 10.1111/scs.13051. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
The Development and Validation of a Perceived Nursing Support Scale for Mothers of Preterm Infants.
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2021 Dec;15(5):317-326. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
8
A View from the past into our collective future: the oncofertility consortium vision statement.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jan;38(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01983-4. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
Cancer survivorship: Reproductive health outcomes should be included in standard toxicity assessments.
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Feb;144:310-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.032. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
The Educational Program for Healthcare Providers Regarding Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review.
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Jun;36(3):452-462. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01890-3. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验