Ronderos Camilo R, Falkum Ingrid Lossius
Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1135129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1135129. eCollection 2023.
Within Relevance Theory, it has been suggested that extended metaphors might be processed differently relative to single metaphoric uses. While single metaphors are hypothesized to be understood the creation of an concept, extended metaphors have been claimed to require a switch to a secondary processing mode, which gives greater prominence to the literal meaning. Initial experimental evidence has supported a distinction by showing differences in reading times between single and extended metaphors. However, beyond potential differences in comprehension speed, Robyn Carston's 'lingering of the literal' account seems to predict qualitative differences in the interpretative mechanisms involved. In the present work, we test the hypothesis that during processing of extended metaphors, the mechanisms of enhancement and suppression of activation levels of literal-related features operate differently relative to single metaphors. We base our work on a study by Paula Rubio-Fernández, which showed that processing single metaphors involves suppressing features related exclusively to the literal meaning of the metaphoric vehicle after 1000 milliseconds of encountering the metaphor. Our goal was to investigate whether suppression is also involved in the comprehension of extended metaphors, or whether the 'lingering of the literal' leads to continued activation of literal-related features, as we take Carston's account to predict. We replicate existing results, in as much as we find that activation levels of literal-related features are reduced after 1000 milliseconds. Critically, we also show that the pattern of suppression does not hold for extended metaphors, for which literal-related features remain activated after 1000 milliseconds. We see our results as providing support for Carston's view that extended metaphor processing involves a prominent role of literal meaning, contributing towards explicating the links between theoretical predictions within Relevance Theory and online sentence processing.
在关联理论中,有人提出,扩展隐喻的处理方式可能与单个隐喻用法有所不同。虽然单个隐喻被假定为通过创建一个新的概念来理解,但扩展隐喻据称需要切换到一种次要的处理模式,这种模式更突出字面意义。初步的实验证据通过显示单个隐喻和扩展隐喻在阅读时间上的差异,支持了这种区分。然而,除了理解速度上的潜在差异外,罗宾·卡斯顿(Robyn Carston)的“字面意义的 lingering”观点似乎预测了所涉及的解释机制在质上的差异。在本研究中,我们测试了这样一个假设:在处理扩展隐喻时,与字面意义相关特征的激活水平增强和抑制机制相对于单个隐喻的运作方式不同。我们的研究基于宝拉·鲁维奥 - 费尔南德斯(Paula Rubio-Fernández)的一项研究,该研究表明,处理单个隐喻时,在遇到隐喻1000毫秒后,会抑制仅与隐喻载体字面意义相关的特征。我们的目标是研究抑制是否也参与扩展隐喻的理解,或者“字面意义的 lingering”是否会导致与字面意义相关特征的持续激活,正如我们根据卡斯顿的观点所预测的那样。我们复制了现有结果,即我们发现与字面意义相关特征的激活水平在1000毫秒后会降低。至关重要的是,我们还表明,抑制模式不适用于扩展隐喻,对于扩展隐喻,与字面意义相关的特征在1000毫秒后仍保持激活状态。我们认为我们的结果为卡斯顿的观点提供了支持,即扩展隐喻处理涉及字面意义的突出作用,有助于阐明关联理论中的理论预测与在线句子处理之间的联系。