• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

策略性监测可提高前瞻性记忆:一项元分析。

Strategic monitoring improves prospective memory: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2546-2569. doi: 10.1177/17470218231161015. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1177/17470218231161015
PMID:37010132
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10585947/
Abstract

Monitoring the environment for target events that trigger prospective memory (PM) retrieval requires cognitive resources, reflected by costs to ongoing task performance (i.e., worse accuracy and/or slower response times). Strategic monitoring refers to the use of context to engage or disengage monitoring when a PM target is anticipated or unanticipated. Laboratory strategic monitoring studies have found mixed results as to whether context specification improves PM performance. This study employed a meta-analytic technique to assess the overall effect of context specification on PM performance and ongoing task metrics of strategic monitoring. Overall, context specification improved PM performance when the target was anticipated and improved ongoing task performance (speed and accuracy) when the target was not anticipated. Moderator analyses revealed the degree of slowing in anticipated contexts predicted how much context specification improved PM performance. However, the benefits to PM performance from context specification differed by the type of procedure used. PM performance was improved when context changes could be predicted during blocked or proximity procedures, but not when context varied randomly in trial-level procedures. These results provide insights into the mechanisms underlying strategic monitoring and guidance for researchers on which procedures to be use depending on the theory-driven questions.

摘要

监测环境中的目标事件以触发前瞻性记忆(PM)检索需要认知资源,这反映在对正在进行的任务表现的影响上(即准确性降低和/或反应时间变慢)。策略性监测是指在预期或非预期的 PM 目标出现时,使用上下文来参与或不参与监测。实验室策略性监测研究对上下文规范是否能提高 PM 表现的结果存在分歧。本研究采用元分析技术来评估上下文规范对 PM 表现和策略性监测的持续任务指标的总体影响。总体而言,当目标可以预期时,上下文规范可以提高 PM 表现,而当目标不可预期时,它可以提高持续任务的表现(速度和准确性)。调节分析表明,预期背景下的减速程度预测了上下文规范可以提高 PM 表现的程度。然而,上下文规范对 PM 表现的益处因所使用的程序类型而异。当在阻塞或接近程序中可以预测上下文变化时,PM 表现会提高,但在试验级程序中随机变化时则不会。这些结果为策略性监测的机制提供了深入了解,并为研究人员提供了根据理论驱动问题选择使用哪种程序的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/22727f319c6a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/e2302888e824/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/1db09057ffd7/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/26122d84991a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/0e0a7d99891a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/c4bbaacc3c3a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/8f5037037658/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/575f475078f0/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/9357fb4670ad/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/22727f319c6a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/e2302888e824/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/1db09057ffd7/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/26122d84991a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/0e0a7d99891a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/c4bbaacc3c3a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/8f5037037658/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/575f475078f0/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/9357fb4670ad/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e66c/10585947/22727f319c6a/10.1177_17470218231161015-fig9.jpg

相似文献

1
Strategic monitoring improves prospective memory: A meta-analysis.策略性监测可提高前瞻性记忆:一项元分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2546-2569. doi: 10.1177/17470218231161015. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Toward a better understanding of costs in prospective memory: A meta-analytic review.为了更好地理解前瞻性记忆的成本:一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Nov;145(11):1053-1081. doi: 10.1037/bul0000208. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
3
Electrophysiological correlates of strategic monitoring in event-based and time-based prospective memory.基于事件和基于时间的前瞻性记忆中策略监测的电生理相关性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031659. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
4
Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach.在预期记忆中,分离已完成意图的后效和正在进行任务的成本的子过程:一种鼠标跟踪方法。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1590-1613. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01289-z. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
5
The ERP correlates of target checking are dependent upon the defining features of the prospective memory cues.目标检查的事件相关电位(ERP)相关性取决于前瞻性记忆线索的定义特征。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Sep;93(3):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
6
Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.语境线索焦点影响策略前瞻性记忆监测。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1405-1415. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1442-9.
7
Target context specification can reduce costs in nonfocal prospective memory.目标情境规范可以降低非焦点前瞻性记忆的成本。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Nov;39(6):1757-64. doi: 10.1037/a0033702. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
8
Cognitive control processes underlying time-based prospective memory impairment in individuals with high depressive symptomatology.高抑郁症状个体中基于时间的前瞻性记忆损害背后的认知控制过程。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jun;149:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
9
The effect of semantic context on prospective memory performance.语义情境对前瞻记忆表现的影响。
Memory. 2016;24(3):315-23. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1004351. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
After-effects without monitoring costs: The impact of prospective memory instructions on task switching performance.无监测成本的后效应:前瞻记忆指令对任务切换表现的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:85-99. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Looking for cues over time: A study on self-initiated monitoring in event-based and time-based prospective memory.随着时间寻找线索:一项关于基于事件和基于时间的前瞻记忆中自我发起监测的研究。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01700-5.
2
Keeping the Time: The Impact of External Clock-Speed Manipulation on Time-Based Prospective Memory.把握时间:外部时钟速度操纵对基于时间的前瞻性记忆的影响。
J Cogn. 2024 Jul 16;7(1):56. doi: 10.5334/joc.388. eCollection 2024.
3
Assessing time-based prospective memory online: A comparison study between laboratory-based and web-based testing.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency and strategicness of clock-checking explain detrimental age effects in time-based prospective memory.时钟检查的频率和策略性解释了基于时间的前瞻性记忆中有害的年龄效应。
Psychol Aging. 2022 Aug;37(5):637-648. doi: 10.1037/pag0000693. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
2
Flexible attention allocation dynamically impacts incidental encoding in prospective memory.灵活的注意力分配会动态影响前瞻性记忆中的偶然编码。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):112-128. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01199-6. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
在线评估基于时间的前瞻性记忆:基于实验室和基于网络的测试比较研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2214-2227. doi: 10.1177/17470218231220578. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Improving prospective memory with contextual cueing.利用情境线索提高前瞻性记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):692-711. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01122-5. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
5
Aging and strategic prospective memory monitoring.衰老与策略性前瞻记忆监控。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):370-389. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00976-8.
6
The role of time-monitoring behaviour in time-based prospective memory performance in younger and older adults.时间监测行为在年轻和老年成年人基于时间的前瞻性记忆表现中的作用。
Memory. 2020 Jan;28(1):34-48. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1675711. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
The effects of sleep on prospective memory: A systematic review and meta-analysis.睡眠对前瞻记忆的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sleep Med Rev. 2019 Oct;47:18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 31.
8
Racing to remember: A theory of decision control in event-based prospective memory.奔忙于记忆:基于事件的前瞻记忆决策控制理论。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Nov;125(6):851-887. doi: 10.1037/rev0000113. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
9
Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.衰老与运用情境策略来控制前瞻性记忆监测。
Psychol Aging. 2018 May;33(3):527-544. doi: 10.1037/pag0000247.
10
Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.语境线索焦点影响策略前瞻性记忆监测。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1405-1415. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1442-9.