• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展一种在学习曲线初始阶段用于腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的难度评分系统:一项回顾性队列研究。

Development of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in the initial stage of the learning curve: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 Apr 1;109(4):660-669. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000180.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000180
PMID:37010154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389390/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains uncertain how surgeons can safely pass the learning curve of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) without potentially harming patients. We aimed to develop a difficulty scoring system (DSS) to select an appropriate patient for surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 773 elective pancreatoduodenectomy surgeries between July 2014 and December 2019, including 346 LPD and 427 open pancreatoduodenectomy cases, were included. A 10-level DSS for LPD was developed, and an additional 77 consecutive LPD surgeries which could provide information of the learning stage I of LPD externally validated its performance between December 2019 and December 2021.

RESULTS

The incidences of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo≥III) gradually decreased from the learning curve stage I-III (20.00, 10.94, 5.79%, P =0.008, respectively). The DSS consisted of the following independent risk factors: (1) tumor location, (2) vascular resection and reconstruction, (3) learning curve stage, (4) prognostic nutritional index, (5) tumor size, and (6) benign or malignant tumor. The weighted Cohen's κ statistic of concordance between the reviewer's and calculated difficulty score index was 0.873. The C -statistics of DSS for postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo≥III) were 0.818 in the learning curve stage I. The patients with DSS<5 had lower postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo≥III) than those with DSS≥5 (4.35-41.18%, P =0.004) in the training cohort and had a lower postoperative pancreatic fistula (19.23-57.14%, P =0.0352), delayed gastric emptying (19.23-71.43%, P =0.001), and bile leakage rate (0.00-21.43%, P =0.0368) in validation cohort in the learning curve stage I.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a difficulty score model for patient selection, which could facilitate the stepwise adoption of LPD for surgeons at different stages of the learning curve.

摘要

背景

目前仍不清楚外科医生如何在不伤害患者的情况下安全地跨越腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术(LPD)的学习曲线。我们旨在开发一种困难评分系统(DSS),以便为外科医生选择合适的患者。

材料与方法

纳入 2014 年 7 月至 2019 年 12 月期间的 773 例择期胰十二指肠切除术,其中 346 例为 LPD,427 例为开腹胰十二指肠切除术。建立了 LPD 的 10 级 DSS,并在 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 12 月期间连续进行了 77 例 LPD 手术,以提供 LPD 学习阶段 I 的信息来外部验证其性能。

结果

术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥III)的发生率从学习曲线阶段 I-III 逐渐降低(20.00、10.94、5.79%,P=0.008)。DSS 包括以下独立危险因素:(1)肿瘤位置,(2)血管切除和重建,(3)学习曲线阶段,(4)预后营养指数,(5)肿瘤大小,(6)良性或恶性肿瘤。审核者和计算出的难度评分指数之间的加权 Cohen's κ 一致性统计量为 0.873。DSS 对术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥III)的 C 统计量在学习曲线阶段 I 为 0.818。在训练队列中,DSS<5 的患者术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥III)发生率低于 DSS≥5 的患者(4.35-41.18%,P=0.004),在学习曲线阶段 I,术后胰瘘(19.23-57.14%,P=0.0352)、胃排空延迟(19.23-71.43%,P=0.001)和胆漏发生率(0.00-21.43%,P=0.0368)均较低。在验证队列中,在学习曲线阶段 I,DSS<5 的患者术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥III)发生率低于 DSS≥5 的患者(4.35-41.18%,P=0.004),术后胰瘘(19.23-57.14%,P=0.0352)、胃排空延迟(19.23-71.43%,P=0.001)和胆漏发生率(0.00-21.43%,P=0.0368)均较低。

结论

我们开发并验证了一种患者选择的困难评分模型,该模型可以帮助外科医生在学习曲线的不同阶段逐步采用 LPD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe2d/10389390/e9ee9b8406e8/js9-109-0660-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe2d/10389390/e9ee9b8406e8/js9-109-0660-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe2d/10389390/e9ee9b8406e8/js9-109-0660-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in the initial stage of the learning curve: a retrospective cohort study.发展一种在学习曲线初始阶段用于腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的难度评分系统:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Apr 1;109(4):660-669. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000180.
2
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;6(6):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
The outcome of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is improved with patient selection and the learning curve.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的结果可以通过患者选择和学习曲线得到改善。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2070-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08493-z. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with open or laparoscopic reconstruction during the learning curve: a multicenter propensity score matched study.腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术联合开腹或腹腔镜重建在学习曲线期间:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Jul;21(7):857-864. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
5
[Comparative study of short-term efficacy,effectiveness and safety at different stages of the laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy learning curve].[腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术学习曲线不同阶段的短期疗效、有效性及安全性的比较研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul 1;59(7):618-623. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20210330-00147.
6
Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses.多中心腹腔镜与机器人胰十二指肠切除术的比较:倾向评分和学习曲线匹配分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Mar;29(3):311-321. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1078. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
7
Feasibility of simultaneous development of laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.腹腔镜和机器人胰十二指肠切除术同时开发的可行性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 16;13(1):6190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33269-x.
8
Comparison of Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Hybrid and Totally Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy.杂交与完全腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 26;26:e924190. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924190.
9
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤(LEOPARD-2):一项多中心、患者盲法、随机对照 2/3 期试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;4(3):199-207. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy by a single surgeon with extensive laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy experience.单一外科医生在具有广泛腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术经验的情况下学习机器人胰十二指肠切除术的学习曲线。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 28;18(1):298. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02007-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Tampa difficulty score: a scoring system for difficulty of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.坦帕难度评分:一种用于评估机器人胰十二指肠切除术难度的评分系统。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 16;19(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02189-x.
2
Radiological classification of the Heidelberg triangle and its application in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancies.海德堡三角的放射学分类及其在恶性腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的应用。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan 3;22(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03279-0.
3
Impact of Unplanned Intra-Operative Conversions on Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy.
微创胰十二指肠切除术术中计划外转化对结局的影响。
World J Surg. 2023 Oct;47(10):2507-2518. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07114-1. Epub 2023 Jul 12.