Suppr超能文献

家长如何体验遮盖或双眼视差视频游戏治疗弱视?一项定性研究探索治疗偏好和信息需求,以促进决策。

How do parents experience patching or dichoptic action video gaming as amblyopia treatment? A qualitative study exploring treatment preferences and information needs to facilitate decision-making.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Optometry and Orthoptics, HU University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Jul;43(4):649-659. doi: 10.1111/opo.13132. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore parents' experiences, preferences and information needs when either patching treatment or dichoptic action video gaming is used as an amblyopia treatment for their child.

METHODS

A qualitative study was carried out on parents whose newly diagnosed amblyopic children participated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of dichoptic action video gaming versus patching. A purposive heterogenic sample was selected for an additional interview after the study period. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with one or both parents and transcribed verbatim, and a thematic analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Ten families agreed to participate: seven in the patching group and three in the gaming group. Two themes emerged from the data exploring experiences with treatment: (1) factors influencing compliance and (2) burden with treatment. Parents reported creating a routine which improved compliance with patching, as opposed to gaming where parents felt less need to conduct the treatment themselves as it was performed in the outpatient clinic. In both groups, parents experienced an information hiatus regarding the role of refractive error. In deciding the type of treatment to be used, parents preferred to deliberate the choice with the healthcare professional and discuss considerations resulting in shared decisions. The emerging themes were (1) effect and efficiency of treatment, (2) organisational aspects of treatments and (3) their child's traits.

CONCLUSION

This study provides insight into the experiences of parents whose children underwent different types of amblyopia therapy. Both treatments have their own advantages and disadvantages. For parents, the effectiveness and efficiency of treatment were the most important aspects when deciding the method of management. Parents wish to come to a well-informed, shared decision regarding the type of amblyopia treatment.

摘要

目的

探索当使用遮盖治疗或双眼视动游戏作为儿童弱视治疗时,父母的体验、偏好和信息需求。

方法

对新近被诊断为弱视的儿童参与比较双眼视动游戏与遮盖治疗效果的随机对照试验(RCT)的父母进行了一项定性研究。在研究结束后,对具有异质性的目的样本进行了额外的访谈。对一位或两位父母进行了半结构化访谈并逐字记录下来,并进行了主题分析。

结果

有 10 个家庭同意参与:7 个在遮盖组,3 个在游戏组。从数据中出现了两个主题,探讨了治疗体验:(1)影响依从性的因素和(2)治疗负担。父母报告说创建了一个常规,从而提高了对遮盖治疗的依从性,而游戏组的父母则觉得自己不需要像在门诊诊所那样自己进行治疗,因为这是在门诊诊所进行的。在这两个组中,父母都经历了一段关于屈光不正作用的信息空白期。在决定使用哪种治疗方法时,父母更愿意与医疗保健专业人员商量选择,并讨论考虑因素,从而做出共同决策。出现的主题有(1)治疗的效果和效率,(2)治疗的组织方面和(3)他们孩子的特点。

结论

本研究深入了解了接受不同类型弱视治疗的儿童的父母的体验。两种治疗方法各有优缺点。对于父母来说,治疗的有效性和效率是决定管理方法时最重要的方面。父母希望就弱视治疗的类型做出知情、共同的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验