Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
Menzies Health Research Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 3;13(4):e070370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070370.
Existing scoping reviews on the link between primary healthcare (PHC) and universal health coverage (UHC) have not sufficiently addressed the underlying causal mechanisms in which key strategic and operational PHC levers contribute to improved health system and realisation of UHC. This realist review aims to examine how key PHC levers work (independently and holistically) to achieve an improved health system and UHC, and the conditions and caveats that influence the outcome.
We will employ a four-step realist evaluation approach: (1) define the review scope and develop initial programme theory, (2) database search, (3) data extraction and appraisal, (4) synthesis of evidence. Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar) and grey literature will be searched to identify initial programme theories underlying the key strategic and operational levers of PHC and empirical evidence to test these matrices of programme theories. Evidence from each document will be abstracted, appraised and synthesised through a process of reasoning using a realistic logic of analysis (ie, theoretical, or conceptual frameworks). The extracted data will then be analysed using a realist context-mechanism-outcome configuration, including what caused an outcome, through which mechanism, and under which context.
Given the studies are scoping reviews of published articles, ethics approval is not required. Key dissemination strategies will include academic papers, policy briefs and conference presentations. By capturing the relationship between sociopolitical, cultural and economic contexts and the pathways in which PHC levers interact with each other and the broader health system, findings from this review will facilitate the design and development of evidence-based, context-sensitive strategies that will enhance effective and sustainable PHC implementation strategies.
现有的关于初级卫生保健(PHC)与全民健康覆盖(UHC)之间联系的范围综述,尚未充分探讨关键的 PHC 战略和运营杠杆如何通过潜在的因果机制促进改善卫生系统和实现全民健康覆盖。本真实主义综述旨在研究关键的 PHC 杠杆如何(独立地和整体地)发挥作用,以改善卫生系统和实现全民健康覆盖,以及影响结果的条件和注意事项。
我们将采用四步真实主义评估方法:(1)定义综述范围并制定初始计划理论,(2)数据库搜索,(3)数据提取和评估,(4)证据综合。将检索电子数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、SCOPUS、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar)和灰色文献,以确定 PHC 的关键战略和运营杠杆的初始计划理论和检验这些计划理论矩阵的经验证据。从每个文件中提取的证据将通过使用真实逻辑分析(即理论或概念框架)的推理过程进行抽象、评估和综合。然后,将使用真实主义的背景-机制-结果配置分析提取的数据,包括导致结果的原因、通过哪些机制以及在哪些背景下。
鉴于这些研究是对已发表文章的范围综述,因此不需要伦理批准。关键传播策略将包括学术论文、政策简报和会议演讲。通过捕捉社会政治、文化和经济背景以及 PHC 杠杆相互作用以及与更广泛的卫生系统相互作用的途径之间的关系,本综述的结果将有助于设计和开发基于证据、适应背景的策略,从而增强有效的和可持续的 PHC 实施策略。