Nalin D R, Levine M M, Young C R, Bergquist E J, McLaughlin J C
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):700-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.700-703.1978.
The heat-stable enterotoxin (ST) of Escherichia coli can be detected by infant mouse or dog intestinal loop tests. These tests differ in that the dog assay uses concentrated culture supernatants and is based on measurements of net intestinal absorption, whereas the mouse test uses unconcentrated supernatants and depends on gross fluid accumulation. To compare the relative sensitivities of these assays, culture supernatants of randomly selected E. coli isolates from 34 Bangalee diarrhea patients were tested for ST in dog loops and infant mice. Supernatants were also tested for heat-labile enterotoxin (LT) in dog loops, Y-1 adrenal cells, and Chinese hamster ovary cells. E. coli supernatants that produced positive responses for both ST and LT in the dog loop assay (ST+/LT+) also produced positive responses when tested for ST in infant mice and for LT in cell lines. Supernatants of strains negative for ST and LT in dog loop (ST-/LT) were also negative in other assays. Of 10 strains positive for just ST in the dog loop test (ST+/LT-), only 5 were ST positive in the standard infant mouse test. Supernatants of the other five strains (dog loop positive, mouse test negative) were then concentrated 100-fold and retested in mice. Three of these five gave consistently positive results after concentration, and two were only intermittently positive. Concentrated supernatants of negative control strains (ST-/LT-) were all negative in mice. The dog assay detects more strains producing ST than the infant mouse test. The infant mouse test, which detects only gross fluid accumulation, failed to detect approximately half of the 10 strains which produced ST alone (ST+/LT-; P = 0.025). Concentrating supernatants for the mouse assay increases sensitivity for detection of ST, but certain E. coli strains produce a variety of ST to which infant mice do not respond.
大肠杆菌的热稳定肠毒素(ST)可通过幼鼠或犬肠襻试验检测。这些试验的不同之处在于,犬试验使用浓缩的培养上清液,基于肠道净吸收量的测量,而小鼠试验使用未浓缩的上清液,依赖于总的液体蓄积。为比较这些试验的相对敏感性,对从34例孟加拉腹泻患者中随机选取的大肠杆菌分离株的培养上清液进行犬肠襻试验和幼鼠试验以检测ST。上清液还在犬肠襻、Y - 1肾上腺细胞和中国仓鼠卵巢细胞中检测热不稳定肠毒素(LT)。在犬肠襻试验中对ST和LT均产生阳性反应(ST + / LT +)的大肠杆菌上清液,在幼鼠中检测ST以及在细胞系中检测LT时也产生阳性反应。在犬肠襻试验中对ST和LT均呈阴性(ST - / LT -)的菌株上清液在其他试验中也为阴性。在犬肠襻试验中仅对ST呈阳性(ST + / LT -)的10株菌株中,只有5株在标准幼鼠试验中ST呈阳性。然后将其他5株菌株(犬肠襻试验阳性,小鼠试验阴性)的上清液浓缩100倍并在小鼠中重新检测。这5株中的3株浓缩后始终呈阳性结果,2株仅间歇性呈阳性。阴性对照菌株(ST - / LT -)的浓缩上清液在小鼠中均为阴性。犬试验检测到产生ST的菌株比幼鼠试验更多。仅检测总的液体蓄积的幼鼠试验未能检测到单独产生ST的10株菌株中的大约一半(ST + / LT -;P = 0.025)。将小鼠试验的上清液浓缩可提高检测ST的敏感性,但某些大肠杆菌菌株产生多种幼鼠无反应的ST。