Independent Scholar.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2183005. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2183005.
This letter to the editor aims to address claims made by Bailey et al. [2023. Appeasement: Replacing Stockholm syndrome as a definition of a survival strategy. , (1), 2161038] about the history of the concept of appeasement in relation to mammalian survival responses as well as the fawn response, by offering a brief overview and analysis of the literature.
这封给编辑的信旨在回应贝利等人的观点[2023. 绥靖：取代斯德哥尔摩综合征作为生存策略的定义。 ，(1)，2161038]，他们认为在哺乳动物的生存反应和幼鹿反应方面，绥靖的概念历史存在争议。为此，我们提供了对相关文献的简要概述和分析。
