School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0283951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283951. eCollection 2023.
Misinformation can continue to influence reasoning after correction; this is known as the continued influence effect (CIE). Theoretical accounts of the CIE suggest failure of two cognitive processes to be causal, namely memory updating and suppression of misinformation reliance. Both processes can also be conceptualised as subcomponents of contemporary executive function (EF) models; specifically, working-memory updating and prepotent-response inhibition. EF may thus predict susceptibility to the CIE. The current study investigated whether individual differences in EF could predict individual differences in CIE susceptibility. Participants completed several measures of EF subcomponents, including those of updating and inhibition, as well as set shifting, and a standard CIE task. The relationship between EF and CIE was then assessed using a correlation analysis of the EF and CIE measures, as well as structural equation modelling of the EF-subcomponent latent variable and CIE latent variable. Results showed that EF can predict susceptibility to the CIE, especially the factor of working-memory updating. These results further our understanding of the CIE's cognitive antecedents and provide potential directions for real-world CIE intervention.
错误信息在被纠正后仍能继续影响推理;这被称为持续影响效应(CIE)。CIE 的理论解释表明,两个认知过程的失败是导致这一效应的原因,即记忆更新和对错误信息依赖的抑制。这两个过程也可以被概念化为当代执行功能(EF)模型的子成分;具体来说,工作记忆更新和优势反应抑制。因此,EF 可能预测对 CIE 的易感性。本研究旨在调查 EF 的个体差异是否可以预测 CIE 易感性的个体差异。参与者完成了几种 EF 子成分的测量,包括更新和抑制、转换和标准 CIE 任务。然后,通过对 EF 和 CIE 测量的相关分析,以及对 EF 子成分潜在变量和 CIE 潜在变量的结构方程模型,评估 EF 和 CIE 之间的关系。结果表明,EF 可以预测对 CIE 的易感性,尤其是工作记忆更新的因素。这些结果进一步加深了我们对 CIE 认知前提的理解,并为现实世界中的 CIE 干预提供了潜在的方向。