• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德克萨斯州参议院第8号法案大幅减少了前往德克萨斯州堕胎诊所的人数。

Texas Senate Bill 8 significantly reduced travel to abortion clinics in Texas.

作者信息

Andersen Martin S, Marsicano Christopher, Pineda Torres Mayra, Slusky David

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States.

Department of Educational Studies, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Mar 20;4:1117724. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1117724. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2023.1117724
PMID:37020904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10067718/
Abstract

The decision by the United States Supreme Court has rescinded the constitutional guarantee of abortion across the United States. As a result, at least 13 states have banned abortion access with unknown effects. Using "Texas" SB8 law that similarly restricted abortions in Texas, we provide insight into how individuals respond to these restrictions using aggregated and anonymized human mobility data. We find that "Texas" SB 8 law reduced mobility near abortion clinics in Texas by people who live in Texas and those who live outside the state. We also find that mobility from Texas to abortion clinics in other states increased, with notable increases in Missouri and Arkansas, two states that subsequently enacted post-Dobbs bans. These results highlight the importance of out-of-state abortion services for women living in highly restrictive states.

摘要

美国最高法院的这一裁决取消了全美范围内堕胎的宪法保障。结果,至少13个州已禁止堕胎,其影响尚不明朗。我们利用类似限制德克萨斯州堕胎的“德克萨斯州”SB8法案,通过汇总和匿名化的人类流动数据,深入了解个人如何应对这些限制。我们发现,“德克萨斯州”SB8法案减少了居住在德克萨斯州内和州外的人前往德克萨斯州堕胎诊所附近的流动。我们还发现,从德克萨斯州前往其他州堕胎诊所的流动增加了,在密苏里州和阿肯色州显著增加,这两个州随后颁布了多布斯案后的禁令。这些结果凸显了州外堕胎服务对生活在限制严格州的女性的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/e75d824b2ed2/fgwh-04-1117724-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/2ade5b5746ec/fgwh-04-1117724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/792637f0634e/fgwh-04-1117724-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/c33e18837921/fgwh-04-1117724-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/e75d824b2ed2/fgwh-04-1117724-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/2ade5b5746ec/fgwh-04-1117724-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/792637f0634e/fgwh-04-1117724-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/c33e18837921/fgwh-04-1117724-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ef1/10067718/e75d824b2ed2/fgwh-04-1117724-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Texas Senate Bill 8 significantly reduced travel to abortion clinics in Texas.德克萨斯州参议院第8号法案大幅减少了前往德克萨斯州堕胎诊所的人数。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Mar 20;4:1117724. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1117724. eCollection 2023.
2
Infant Deaths After Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy.德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎后婴儿死亡。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Aug 1;178(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0885.
3
Border-state abortions increased for Texas residents after House Bill 2.德克萨斯州的边境州堕胎率在众议院法案 2 号通过后上升。
Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):314-318. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
4
Unequal Spatial Consequences of Abortion Restrictions in Texas, 2021-2023.2021-2023 年,德克萨斯州堕胎限制的不平等空间后果。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1024-1033. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307652. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Abortion Access and Medically Complex Pregnancies Before and After Texas Senate Bill 8.得克萨斯州参议院法案 8 前后的堕胎机会和医疗复杂妊娠。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May 1;141(5):995-1003. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005153. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
Factors associated with abortion at 12 or more weeks gestation after implementation of a restrictive Texas law.实施德克萨斯州限制堕胎法后 12 周或以上妊娠终止相关因素。
Contraception. 2020 Nov;102(5):314-317. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
Abortion patients' decision making about where to obtain out-of-state care following Texas' 2021 abortion ban.得克萨斯州 2021 年堕胎禁令后,堕胎患者关于在哪里获得州外护理的决策。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14226. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14226. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
8
Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.美国最高法院“多布斯案”判决后口服避孕药和紧急避孕药的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418620. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620.
9
Association of Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy With the Number of Facility-Based Abortions in Texas and Surrounding States.德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎与德克萨斯州及周边州医疗机构堕胎数量的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2048-2055. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20423.
10
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?美国最高法院推翻宪法堕胎权后,与堕胎和避孕相关的互联网搜索趋势:州法律有多大影响?
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographic Realities of Abortion Access in Texas: Exploring the Heterogeneous Effects of Texas Senate Bill 8 with Mobile Phone Data.德克萨斯州堕胎服务获取的地理现实:利用手机数据探究德克萨斯州参议院第8号法案的异质效应
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2025;44(3):29. doi: 10.1007/s11113-025-09948-0. Epub 2025 May 5.
2
The Effect of on Clinical Diagnosis of Postpartum Depression.关于产后抑郁症临床诊断的影响。 你提供的原文不完整,“The Effect of on”这里缺少具体内容。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Feb 26;12(1):86-96. doi: 10.36469/001c.129633. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Context-specific emergence and growth of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant.SARS-CoV-2 德尔塔变异株的出现与增长具有特定情境性。
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7930):154-160. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05200-3. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Association of Texas Senate Bill 8 With Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion.德克萨斯州参议院法案 8 号与自我管理药物流产请求的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e221122. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1122.
3
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2019.《2019 年美国堕胎监测报告》。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Nov 26;70(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1.
4
New Evidence on the Effects of Mandatory Waiting Periods for Abortion.关于堕胎强制等待期影响的新证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 Dec;80:102533. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102533. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade?最高法院、德克萨斯州堕胎法(SB8)以及罗诉韦德案的终结开端?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 19;326(15):1473-1474. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17639.
6
The unintended effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and stay-at-home orders on abortions.新冠疫情及居家令对堕胎产生的意外影响。
J Popul Econ. 2022;35(1):269-305. doi: 10.1007/s00148-021-00874-x. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
7
Abortion laws and women's health.堕胎法与妇女健康。
J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;76:102413. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102413. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
8
Association of Mobile Phone Location Data Indications of Travel and Stay-at-Home Mandates With COVID-19 Infection Rates in the US.手机定位数据显示的出行和居家令与美国 COVID-19 感染率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2020485. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20485.
9
Did parental involvement laws grow teeth? The effects of state restrictions on minors' access to abortion.父母参与法是否有了效力?州对未成年人堕胎限制的影响。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102302. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102302. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
The Impact of Parental Involvement Laws on the Abortion Rate of Minors.父母参与法对未成年人堕胎率的影响。
Demography. 2020 Feb;57(1):323-346. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00853-8.