Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/@XPengning.
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
J Mol Biol. 2023 May 15;435(10):168086. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168086. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
DNA trinucleotide repeat (TRs) expansion beyond a threshold often results in human neurodegenerative diseases. The mechanisms causing expansions remain unknown, although the tendency of TR ssDNA to self-associate into hairpins that slip along their length is widely presumed related. Here we apply single molecule FRET (smFRET) experiments and molecular dynamics simulations to determine conformational stabilities and slipping dynamics for CAG, CTG, GAC and GTC hairpins. Tetraloops are favored in CAG (89%), CTG (89%) and GTC (69%) while GAC favors triloops. We also determined that TTG interrupts near the loop in the CTG hairpin stabilize the hairpin against slipping. The different loop stabilities have implications for intermediate structures that may form when TR-containing duplex DNA opens. Opposing hairpins in the (CAG) ∙ (CTG) duplex would have matched stability whereas opposing hairpins in a (GAC) ∙ (GTC) duplex would have unmatched stability, introducing frustration in the (GAC) ∙ (GTC) opposing hairpins that could encourage their resolution to duplex DNA more rapidly than in (CAG) ∙ (CTG) structures. Given that the CAG and CTG TR can undergo large, disease-related expansion whereas the GAC and GTC sequences do not, these stability differences can inform and constrain models of expansion mechanisms of TR regions.
DNA 三核苷酸重复(TR)扩展超过阈值通常会导致人类神经退行性疾病。尽管广泛认为 TR ssDNA 自身缔合成沿其长度滑动的发夹的趋势与之相关,但导致扩展的机制仍不清楚。在这里,我们应用单分子 FRET(smFRET)实验和分子动力学模拟来确定 CAG、CTG、GAC 和 GTC 发夹的构象稳定性和滑动动力学。四核苷酸环在 CAG(89%)、CTG(89%)和 GTC(69%)中是有利的,而 GAC 则有利于三核苷酸环。我们还确定,在 CTG 发夹的环附近,TTG 中断会稳定发夹,防止其滑动。不同的环稳定性对 TR 包含的双链 DNA 打开时可能形成的中间结构有影响。(CAG)·(CTG)双链中相反的发夹将具有匹配的稳定性,而(GAC)·(GTC)双链中相反的发夹将具有不匹配的稳定性,这会给(GAC)·(GTC)相反的发夹带来挫折感,使其比在(CAG)·(CTG)结构中更快地解旋为双链 DNA。鉴于 CAG 和 CTG TR 可以经历大的、与疾病相关的扩展,而 GAC 和 GTC 序列则不能,这些稳定性差异可以为 TR 区域扩展机制的模型提供信息和限制。