• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知训练干预中计算机化实施的治疗忠实度的感知促进因素和阻碍因素。

Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Treatment Fidelity in Computerized Cognitive Training Interventions.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;38(3):247-255. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000916. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000916
PMID:37027129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11448957/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerized cognitive training (CCT) interventions may have an important role in improving cognition among patients with heart failure. Ensuring treatment fidelity of CCT interventions is an essential part of testing their efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe facilitators of and barriers to treatment fidelity perceived by CCT intervenors while delivering the interventions to patients with heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A qualitative descriptive study was completed with 7 intervenors who delivered CCT interventions in 3 studies. Directed content analysis revealed 4 main themes of perceived facilitators: (1) training for intervention delivery, (2) supportive work environment, (3) prespecified implementation guide, and (4) confidence and awareness. Three main themes were identified as perceived barriers: (1) technical issues, (2) logistic barriers, and (3) sample characteristics.

CONCLUSION

This study is novel because it was one of the few studies focused on the intervenors' perceptions rather than the patients' perception of using CCT interventions. Beyond the treatment fidelity recommendations, this study found new components that might help the future investigators in designing and implementing CCT interventions with high treatment fidelity.

摘要

背景

计算机化认知训练(CCT)干预措施可能在改善心力衰竭患者的认知方面发挥重要作用。确保 CCT 干预措施的治疗一致性是检验其疗效的重要组成部分。

目的

本研究旨在描述 CCT 干预者在向心力衰竭患者提供干预措施时,对治疗一致性的感知促进因素和障碍因素。

方法和结果

对 7 名在 3 项研究中提供 CCT 干预措施的干预者进行了定性描述性研究。定向内容分析揭示了感知促进因素的 4 个主要主题:(1)干预措施传递培训,(2)支持性工作环境,(3)预设实施指南,以及(4)信心和意识。确定了 3 个主要的感知障碍主题:(1)技术问题,(2)后勤障碍,以及(3)样本特征。

结论

这项研究是新颖的,因为它是少数关注干预者对使用 CCT 干预措施的看法的研究之一,而不是关注患者的看法。除了治疗一致性建议外,这项研究还发现了一些新的组成部分,这可能有助于未来的研究人员在设计和实施具有高度治疗一致性的 CCT 干预措施方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a4/11448957/1204fc433124/nihms-1878391-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a4/11448957/1204fc433124/nihms-1878391-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2a4/11448957/1204fc433124/nihms-1878391-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Treatment Fidelity in Computerized Cognitive Training Interventions.认知训练干预中计算机化实施的治疗忠实度的感知促进因素和阻碍因素。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;38(3):247-255. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000916. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
2
How to engage patients in computerized cognitive training: a cognitive rehabilitation expert's perspective.如何让患者参与计算机化认知训练:认知康复专家的视角。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Aug;19(6):2306-2318. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2023.2284879. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
3
Acceptability of computerized cognitive training and global cognitive stimulating-based games delivered remotely: Results from a randomized controlled trial to address cancer and cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors.远程提供基于计算机化认知训练和全球认知刺激的游戏的可接受性:一项针对乳腺癌幸存者癌症和与癌症相关认知障碍的随机对照试验的结果。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(11):12717-12727. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5904. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
Perspectives of persons with mild cognitive impairment, caregivers and healthcare professionals on computer-assisted cognitive training: A multi-perspective qualitative study.轻度认知障碍患者、照护者及医护专业人员对计算机辅助认知训练的看法:一项多视角定性研究
Geriatr Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;61:560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.12.009. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
5
Designing and implementing two facilitation interventions within the 'Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE)' study: a qualitative analysis from an external facilitators' perspective.设计并实施“促进研究证据实施(FIRE)”研究中的两项促进干预措施:来自外部促进者视角的定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2018 Nov 16;13(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0812-z.
6
Computerized Cognitive Training and 24-Month Mortality in Heart Failure.计算机化认知训练与心力衰竭患者的24个月死亡率
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2024;39(2):E51-E58. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000001023. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
7
Exploring the perceptions of former ICU patients and clinical staff on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of virtual reality exposure therapy: A qualitative study.探索前 ICU 患者和临床工作人员对虚拟现实暴露疗法实施的障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Mar;29(2):313-324. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12868. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
8
Multi-method study of the implementation of Cognitive Symptom Management and Rehabilitation Training (CogSMART) in real-world settings.多方法研究认知症状管理和康复训练(CogSMART)在真实环境中的实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):1542. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08941-z.
9
Effectiveness of Virtual - Compensatory Cognitive Training (V-CCT) for improving cognition in persons with schizophrenia - a multi- centre randomized controlled trial.虚拟现实补偿认知训练(V-CCT)对改善精神分裂症患者认知功能的效果 - 一项多中心随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Nov 1;25(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08568-x.
10
Computerised cognitive training for 12 or more weeks for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life.针对认知健康的老年人进行12周或更长时间的计算机化认知训练以维持其认知功能。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD012277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012277.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of the Mediterranean Diet-Integrated Gamified Home-Based Cognitive-Nutritional (GAHOCON) Training Programme for Older People With Cognitive Frailty: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.地中海饮食整合式游戏化居家认知营养(GAHOCON)训练计划对认知衰弱老年人的影响:试点随机对照试验
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Dec 13;11:e60155. doi: 10.2196/60155.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Self-management of heart failure in dementia and cognitive impairment: a systematic review.痴呆和认知障碍患者心力衰竭的自我管理:系统评价。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Apr 29;19(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1077-4.
3
Exercise and Cognitive Training as a Strategy to Improve Neurocognitive Outcomes in Heart Failure: A Pilot Study.
运动与认知训练作为改善心力衰竭神经认知结局的策略:一项试点研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;27(8):809-819. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.01.211. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
4
Can Computerized Cognitive Training Improve Cognition in Patients With Heart Failure?: A Review.计算机化认知训练能否改善心力衰竭患者的认知功能?一项综述。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;34(2):E19-E27. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000558.
5
The Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment Among Adults With Incident Heart Failure: The "Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke" (REGARDS) Study.在患有心力衰竭的成年人中认知障碍的发生率:“地理和种族差异在中风方面的原因”(REGARDS)研究。
J Card Fail. 2019 Feb;25(2):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
6
Design and Rationale of the Cognitive Intervention to Improve Memory in Heart Failure Patients Study.认知干预改善心力衰竭患者记忆研究的设计和原理。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):344-355. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000463.
7
Heart and brain interaction in patients with heart failure: overview and proposal for a taxonomy. A position paper from the Study Group on Heart and Brain Interaction of the Heart Failure Association.心力衰竭患者的心脏和大脑相互作用:概述和分类建议。心力衰竭协会心脏和大脑相互作用研究组的立场文件。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;20(2):199-215. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1100. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
8
Memory-focused interventions for people with cognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.以记忆为焦点的干预措施对认知障碍患者的影响:一项随机对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Feb;78:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 20.
9
Establishing Fidelity of Occupational Performance Coaching.建立职业表现指导的保真度。
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2018 Apr;38(2):96-104. doi: 10.1177/1539449217724755. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
10
Cognitive Impairment and Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.认知障碍与心力衰竭:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Card Fail. 2017 Jun;23(6):464-475. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 19.