Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Sep 1;48(17):1224-1233. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004664. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
A retrospective cohort study.
To identify the factors associated with readmissions after PLF using machine learning and logistic regression (LR) models.
Readmissions after posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) place significant health and financial burden on the patient and overall health care system.
The Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database was used to identify patients who underwent posterior lumbar laminectomy, fusion, and instrumentation between 2004 and 2017. Four machine learning models and a multivariable LR model were used to assess factors most closely associated with 30-day readmission. These models were also evaluated in terms of ability to predict unplanned 30-day readmissions. The top-performing model (Gradient Boosting Machine; GBM) was then compared with the validated LACE index in terms of potential cost savings associated with the implementation of the model.
A total of 18,981 patients were included, of which 3080 (16.2%) were readmitted within 30 days of initial admission. Discharge status, prior admission, and geographic division were most influential for the LR model, whereas discharge status, length of stay, and prior admissions had the greatest relevance for the GBM model. GBM outperformed LR in predicting unplanned 30-day readmission (mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.865 vs. 0.850, P <0.0001). The use of GBM also achieved a projected 80% decrease in readmission-associated costs relative to those achieved by the LACE index model.
The factors associated with readmission vary in terms of predictive influence based on standard LR and machine learning models used, highlighting the complementary roles these models have in identifying relevant factors for the prediction of 30-day readmissions. For PLF procedures, GBM yielded the greatest predictive ability and associated cost savings for readmission.
回顾性队列研究。
使用机器学习和逻辑回归(LR)模型确定腰椎融合术后再入院的相关因素。
腰椎融合术后(PLF)再入院给患者和整个医疗保健系统带来了显著的健康和经济负担。
使用 Optum Clinformatics Data Mart 数据库确定 2004 年至 2017 年间接受后路腰椎椎板切除术、融合和器械治疗的患者。使用四种机器学习模型和多变量 LR 模型评估与 30 天再入院最密切相关的因素。还评估了这些模型预测计划外 30 天再入院的能力。然后,将表现最佳的模型(梯度提升机;GBM)与经过验证的 LACE 指数进行比较,以评估实施该模型与相关的潜在成本节约。
共纳入 18981 例患者,其中 3080 例(16.2%)在初次入院后 30 天内再次入院。LR 模型中最具影响力的因素是出院状态、既往入院和地理分区,而 GBM 模型中最相关的因素是出院状态、住院时间和既往入院。GBM 在预测计划外 30 天再入院方面优于 LR(平均接受者操作特征曲线下面积 0.865 与 0.850,P <0.0001)。与 LACE 指数模型相比,使用 GBM 还可实现与再入院相关成本降低 80%的预期目标。
基于标准 LR 和机器学习模型,再入院相关因素在预测影响方面存在差异,这突出了这些模型在识别 30 天再入院预测相关因素方面的互补作用。对于 PLF 手术,GBM 在预测再入院方面具有最大的预测能力和相关成本节约。
3。