SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa.
SAMRC Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa; Global Health Research Institute, School of Human Development and Health, University of Southampton, Southampton S016 6YD, UK.
Prev Med. 2023 Jul;172:107499. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107499. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Behavioural non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) (e.g., mask wearing, quarantine, restriction on gatherings, physical distancing) have been used to interrupt transmission of COVID-19 and to reduce the impacts of the pandemic. The aim of this scoping review was to document the efficacy of behavioural NPIs to positively influence COVID-19 outcomes. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Psych INFO, Medline, CINAHL and Scopus for studies published between January 2020 and February 2023. Seventy -seven studies were eligible to be included in the review. Majority of the studies were conducted in high-income countries, with fewer studies in low- or middle-income countries. School closure, mask wearing, and non-essential business closure and shelter-in-place orders were the most prevalent NPIs investigated. School closure and mask wearing reported high effectiveness while shelter-in-place orders reported less effectiveness. Shelter-in-place orders when used in conjunction with other measures, did not enhance effectiveness. Public event bans, physical distancing, handwashing, and travel restrictions were largely effective, while the effectiveness of gathering restrictions depended on the limitation on numbers. Early implementation was associated with a higher effectiveness in reducing COVID-19 cases and deaths, the use of behavioural NPIs in combinations was reported to yield more effective results. Moreover, behavioural NPIs were reported to be dependent on their consistent use and were difficult behaviours to maintain, highlighting the need for behavioural change. This review highlighted the effectiveness of behavioural NPIs to positively influence COVID-19 reduction outcomes. Further research to promote country- and context-specific documents that will enhance the effectiveness of behavioural NPIs.
行为性非药物干预措施(例如佩戴口罩、隔离、限制聚集、保持身体距离)已被用于阻断 COVID-19 的传播并减轻大流行的影响。本范围综述的目的是记录行为性非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 结果产生积极影响的功效。根据 PRISMA 指南,对 PubMed、ScienceDirect、Psych INFO、Medline、CINAHL 和 Scopus 进行了系统检索,以查找 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月期间发表的研究。有 77 项研究符合纳入本综述的条件。大多数研究在高收入国家进行,而在低收入和中等收入国家的研究较少。学校关闭、佩戴口罩、非必要商业关闭和就地避难所命令是非药物干预措施中最常见的措施。学校关闭和佩戴口罩报告的效果较高,而就地避难所命令报告的效果较低。当与其他措施一起使用时,就地避难所命令并未提高效果。禁止公共活动、保持身体距离、洗手和旅行限制基本上是有效的,而集会限制的有效性取决于对人数的限制。早期实施与减少 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数的更高效果相关,行为性非药物干预措施的组合使用报告产生了更有效的结果。此外,行为性非药物干预措施报告称取决于其持续使用,并且难以维持,这突出了需要进行行为改变。本综述强调了行为性非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 减少结果产生积极影响的功效。需要进一步研究,以制定促进国家和具体情况的文件,提高行为性非药物干预措施的效果。