Suppr超能文献

基于社区的系统动力学在预防干预中的成功:文献系统评价。

Success of community-based system dynamics in prevention interventions: A systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 24;11:1103834. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1103834. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Systems thinking approaches are increasingly being used to help communities understand and develop responses to preventing complex health problems. Less is known about how success is characterized and what influences success in these approaches. We present a systematic review of how concepts of success are understood and evaluated in the peer reviewed literature of studies using systems thinking in community prevention. We searched five databases for peer-reviewed literature published between 2000 and 2022, with search terms related to systems thinking, prevention and community. Studies were included if they; reported using community-based systems thinking to prevent a public health problem; described the engagement and empowerment of community members to address a public health issue; and, were published in English. Thirty-four articles were identified from 10 countries. Twenty-one aimed to prevent a chronic disease (e.g., obesity) and 16 measured success using specific tools, 10 of which used semi-structured interviews or surveys. Measures of success included implementation processes, cultural appropriateness, the number or type of actions implemented, effectiveness of community action, and changes in individual thinking or mental models, population health outcomes, data collected, or systems level measures. Implementation factors influencing success included the capacity to engage participants, composition and experience of facilitators, strength of coordination teams, allocation of resources, adaptation to participant feedback, use of multiple systems approaches, workshop process providing time and methods to allow new insights, flexible delivery, and diversity of perspectives. Findings from each of the articles indicated that approaches increased a range of outcomes including community action, strategic thinking, future planning and evaluation, community buy-in, community voice, contribution and leadership, in addition to developing shared visions and goals and creating new, ongoing collaborations, among many others. Measures of success varied, suggesting more empirical reporting of proposed outcomes of system science in communities would be valuable. While the measurement of success in the use of systems thinking in community-based prevention efforts is limited, there are helpful examples we can look to for future measurement of success.

摘要

系统思维方法越来越多地被用于帮助社区理解和制定预防复杂健康问题的措施。然而,对于这些方法的成功特征以及影响成功的因素知之甚少。我们对使用系统思维进行社区预防的同行评议文献中如何理解和评估成功概念进行了系统回顾。我们在五个数据库中搜索了 2000 年至 2022 年期间发表的同行评议文献,检索词与系统思维、预防和社区相关。符合以下条件的研究被纳入:报告使用基于社区的系统思维来预防公共卫生问题;描述社区成员的参与和赋权以解决公共卫生问题;以英文发表。从 10 个国家中确定了 34 篇文章。其中 21 项旨在预防慢性病(如肥胖),16 项使用特定工具衡量成功,其中 10 项使用半结构化访谈或调查。成功的衡量标准包括实施过程、文化适宜性、实施的行动数量或类型、社区行动的效果、个体思维或心理模型的变化、人口健康结果、收集的数据或系统层面的措施。影响成功的实施因素包括吸引参与者的能力、促进者的组成和经验、协调团队的实力、资源分配、根据参与者的反馈进行调整、使用多种系统方法、研讨会过程提供时间和方法以允许新的见解、灵活的交付以及观点的多样性。每篇文章的结果都表明,这些方法增加了一系列结果,包括社区行动、战略思维、未来规划和评估、社区认同、社区声音、贡献和领导力,除了制定共同的愿景和目标以及创建新的、持续的合作关系之外,还有许多其他方面。成功的衡量标准各不相同,因此,更有价值的是对社区系统科学应用的预期结果进行更具实证性的报告。虽然系统思维在基于社区的预防工作中的使用成功的衡量标准有限,但我们可以借鉴一些有用的例子来衡量未来的成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7086/10080052/3c0ae2fa1c79/fpubh-11-1103834-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验