Killackey M A, Jones W B, Lewis J L
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Jun;67(6):766-70. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198606000-00004.
During a five-year period, 460 patients underwent cervical conization on the Gynecology Service at Memorial Hospital. The pertinent medical history of the 393 patients was reviewed as it related to the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. All patients had repeat Papanicolaou smears and 94.4% had complete colposcopic examination using standard colposcopic procedures, endocervical curettage, and directed biopsies. For the purpose of this review, patients were separated into seven groups according to the primary and most significant indication for conization. The indications for the procedure and the histopathologic findings are discussed for each category. The usefulness of conization in the authors' institution varied according to the indication for which it was carried out. In this series of 393 patients, 18 patients (4.7%) initially diagnosed to have only intraepithelial disease, were found to have invasive carcinoma.
在五年期间,460例患者在纪念医院妇科接受了宫颈锥切术。回顾了393例患者与宫颈上皮内瘤变诊断相关的病史。所有患者均接受了重复巴氏涂片检查,94.4%的患者采用标准阴道镜检查程序、宫颈管刮除术和定向活检进行了完整的阴道镜检查。为了本次回顾的目的,根据锥切术的主要和最重要指征,将患者分为七组。对每一类别的手术指征和组织病理学发现进行了讨论。在作者所在机构,锥切术的有用性因实施该手术的指征而异。在这组393例患者中,18例(4.7%)最初诊断仅为上皮内疾病的患者被发现患有浸润癌。