• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

企业内LVIS双支架技术联合弹簧圈栓塞治疗急性破裂颅内椎基底动脉夹层动脉瘤患者

LVIS-within-enterprise double-stent technique with coil embolization in the treatment of patients with acutely ruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar artery-dissecting aneurysms.

作者信息

Wu Qiaowei, Meng Yuxiao, Chen Aixia, Xu Shancai, Wang Chunlei, Ji Zhiyong, Qi Jingtao, Yuan Kaikun, Shao Jiang, Shi Huaizhang, Wu Pei

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 24;14:1069380. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1069380. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2023.1069380
PMID:37034072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10081676/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS)-within-enterprise double-stent technique for patients with acutely ruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar artery-dissecting aneurysms (ari-VBDAs).

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with ari-VBDAs who underwent reconstructive treatment using LVIS-within-enterprise double-stent technique with coil embolization between January 2014 and May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients' characteristics and clinical and imaging outcomes were reviewed. The functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin scale (mRS).

RESULTS

A total of 34 ari-VBDAs were identified, including seven (20.6%) basilar artery aneurysms and 27 (79.4%) vertebral artery aneurysms. All aneurysms were successfully treated in the acute phase. In total, six (20.0%) patients experienced in-hospital serious adverse events, including two deaths (6.7%). The median clinical follow-up time of the remaining 28 patients was 20.0 (IQR, 7.3-40.8) months. The incidences of dependency or death (mRS score of 3-6) at discharge and at the last follow-up were 16.7% and 14.3%, respectively. Aneurysm rebleeding occurred in one (3.3%) patient periprocedurally. In total, three (10.0%) patients had ischemic events, one of which occurred during the periprocedural period and two occurred during follow-up. A total of two patients (6.7%) underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Imaging follow-up was available for 14 patients at the median of 12.0 (IQR, 7.0-12.3) months, with a complete occlusion rate of 93.3% (14/15). In total, one patient experienced parent artery occlusion, and no aneurysm was recanalized.

CONCLUSION

LVIS-within-enterprise double-stent technique with coil embolization for the treatment of patients with ari-VBDAs could be performed with a good safety profile and high technical success rate. The rate of complete aneurysm occlusion during follow-up seemed to be satisfactory.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估企业内低轮廓可视化腔内支撑(LVIS)双支架技术治疗急性破裂颅内椎动脉夹层动脉瘤(ari-VBDAs)患者的可行性。

方法

回顾性纳入2014年1月至2022年5月期间30例采用企业内LVIS双支架技术联合弹簧圈栓塞进行重建治疗的ari-VBDAs患者。回顾患者的特征以及临床和影像学结果。使用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估功能结局。

结果

共识别出34个ari-VBDAs,包括7个(20.6%)基底动脉动脉瘤和27个(79.4%)椎动脉动脉瘤。所有动脉瘤均在急性期成功治疗。共有6例(20.0%)患者发生院内严重不良事件,包括2例死亡(6.7%)。其余28例患者的中位临床随访时间为20.0(四分位间距,7.3 - 40.8)个月。出院时和末次随访时依赖或死亡(mRS评分为3 - 6)的发生率分别为16.7%和14.3%。围手术期有1例(3.3%)患者发生动脉瘤再出血。共有3例(10.0%)患者发生缺血性事件,其中1例发生在围手术期,2例发生在随访期间。共有2例(6.7%)患者接受了脑室腹腔分流术。14例患者在中位时间12.0(四分位间距,7.0 - 12.3)个月时进行了影像学随访,完全闭塞率为93.3%(14/15)。共有1例患者发生载瘤动脉闭塞,无动脉瘤再通。

结论

企业内LVIS双支架技术联合弹簧圈栓塞治疗ari-VBDAs患者安全性良好,技术成功率高。随访期间动脉瘤完全闭塞率似乎令人满意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc4a/10081676/7a39aadf3796/fneur-14-1069380-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc4a/10081676/a9257970d932/fneur-14-1069380-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc4a/10081676/7a39aadf3796/fneur-14-1069380-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc4a/10081676/a9257970d932/fneur-14-1069380-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc4a/10081676/7a39aadf3796/fneur-14-1069380-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
LVIS-within-enterprise double-stent technique with coil embolization in the treatment of patients with acutely ruptured intracranial vertebrobasilar artery-dissecting aneurysms.企业内LVIS双支架技术联合弹簧圈栓塞治疗急性破裂颅内椎基底动脉夹层动脉瘤患者
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 24;14:1069380. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1069380. eCollection 2023.
2
Long-term follow-up study of 35 cases after endovascular treatment for vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms.35例椎基底动脉夹层动脉瘤血管内治疗后的长期随访研究
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Oct;137:121-31. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
3
Stent-assisted coil embolization of anterior communicating artery aneurysms using the LVIS Jr stent.使用LVIS Jr支架对前交通动脉瘤进行支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Feb;25(1):12-20. doi: 10.1177/1591019918798144. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Using Double-Overlapping Stents : Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support within Enterprise Stents.使用双重叠支架对急性颅内椎动脉夹层动脉瘤进行血管内治疗的临床和血管造影结果:Enterprise支架内的低轮廓可视化腔内支撑
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2024 Aug;67(5):531-540. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0224. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
[Efficacy analysis of LVIS and Enterprise stent assisted coil in the treatment of vertebral artery dissection aneurysm].LVIS与Enterprise支架辅助弹簧圈治疗椎动脉夹层动脉瘤的疗效分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 5;99(9):685-689. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.09.010.
6
[LVIS stent-assisted coil embolization in the acute stage of ruptured intracranial aneurysms].[LVIS支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤急性期]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jul;32(7):828-834. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200514-00389.
7
Long-term outcomes of Y-stent-assisted coil embolization using Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Junior (LVIS Jr) for intracranial bifurcation aneurysms.使用低剖面可视化腔内支撑支架 Junior(LVIS Jr)辅助线圈栓塞治疗颅内分叉动脉瘤的长期结果。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Jun;217:107275. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107275. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
Low profile visualized intraluminal support stent-assisted Hydrocoil embolization for acutely ruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score-matched cohort study.低剖面可视化腔内支撑支架辅助 Hydrocoil 栓塞治疗急性破裂宽颈颅内动脉瘤:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Jul;218:107302. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107302. Epub 2022 May 21.
9
Low-profile visualized intraluminal support-within-Enterprise overlapping-stent technique versus flow diversion in the treatment of intracranial vertebrobasilar trunk dissecting aneurysms.低轮廓可视化腔内支撑-Enterprise重叠支架技术与血流导向术治疗颅内椎基底动脉主干夹层动脉瘤的对比
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):3536-3546. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-970. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
10
225 intracranial aneurysms treated with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stent: a single-center retrospective study.采用低轮廓可视化腔内支撑(LVIS)支架治疗的225例颅内动脉瘤:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Neurol Res. 2018 Jun;40(6):445-451. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1457608. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
LEO or LEO baby within enterprise overlapping stents combined with coil embolization treatment for ruptured vertebrobasilar artery dissecting aneurysms.在企业重叠支架联合弹簧圈栓塞治疗破裂性椎基底动脉夹层动脉瘤中使用LEO或LEO婴儿型支架
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25153. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11035-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Conservative Therapy vs. Endovascular Approach for Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Trunk Large Aneurysms: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.保守治疗与血管内治疗颅内椎基底动脉干大动脉瘤的前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Jun 20;2022:9682507. doi: 10.1155/2022/9682507. eCollection 2022.
2
Predictive Factors of Recurrence after Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Vertebrobasilar Fusiform Aneurysms.未破裂椎基底动脉梭形动脉瘤血管内治疗后复发的预测因素
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Mar;33(1):73-86. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01184-9. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment of Basilar Trunk and Vertebrobasilar Junction Aneurysms: A Review of 77 Consecutive Cases.
基底动脉主干和椎基底动脉交界区动脉瘤的血管内重建治疗:77例连续病例回顾
Front Neurol. 2022 May 12;13:885776. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.885776. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of Ruptured Aneurysm Circulation on Mortality: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis.破裂动脉瘤循环对死亡率的影响:全国住院患者样本分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Oct;29(10):105124. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105124. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
5
Hemodynamic differences by increasing low profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) stent local compaction across intracranial aneurysm orifice.通过增加低轮廓可视化腔内支撑(LVIS)支架在颅内动脉瘤口的局部压缩来改变血流动力学差异。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Oct;26(5):557-565. doi: 10.1177/1591019920952903. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
6
Treatment of posterior circulation fusiform aneurysms.治疗后循环梭形动脉瘤。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jul 24;134(6):1894-1900. doi: 10.3171/2020.4.JNS192838. Print 2021 Jun 1.
7
Treatment of posterior circulation non-saccular aneurysms with flow diversion versus stent-assisted coiling: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血流导向装置与支架辅助弹簧圈治疗后循环非囊状动脉瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Feb;13(2):159-163. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016294. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
8
Experience With the Pipeline Embolization Device for Posterior Circulations Aneurysms: A Multicenter Cohort Study.Pipeline栓塞装置治疗后循环动脉瘤的经验:一项多中心队列研究。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Nov 16;87(6):1252-1261. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa277.
9
Comparison of Low-Profiled Visualized Intraluminal Support Stent-Assisted Coiling and Coiling Only for Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Safety and Efficacy Based on a Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.低壁可视化腔内支撑支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞与单纯弹簧圈栓塞治疗急性破裂颅内动脉瘤的比较:基于倾向评分匹配队列研究的安全性和有效性。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 1;87(3):584-591. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa110.
10
Segment Occlusion vs. Reconstruction-A Single Center Experience With Endovascular Strategies for Ruptured Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms.节段性闭塞与重建——单中心采用血管内策略治疗破裂性椎基底动脉夹层动脉瘤的经验
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 13;10:207. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00207. eCollection 2019.