Suppr超能文献

五岁以下儿童母亲中疫苗犹豫的患病率及预测因素:一项基于医院的横断面研究。

Prevalence and predictors of vaccine hesitancy among mothers of under-five children: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Goruntla Narayana, Akanksha Kokkala, Lalithaasudhaa Katta, Pinnu Vikash, Jinka Dasaratharamaiah, Bhupalam Pradeepkumar, Doniparthi Jyosna

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Kampala International University (KIU), Western Campus, Uganda.

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER) - Autonomous, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jan 31;12:34. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_687_22. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) states that vaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to global public health. Evidence shows that vaccine hesitancy studies in India are limited and targeted toward individual vaccines. The study aimed to fill this gap by exploring the relationship between demographics and SAGE factors toward vaccine hesitancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A hospital-based, cross-sectional, analytical study was conducted in a non-governmental organization (NGO) hospital with 330 beds, located in Bathalapalli, Andhra Pradesh, India. Mothers of under-five children who attended outpatient departments of pediatrics or obstetrics and gynecology were included. A total of 574 mothers were enrolled and vaccine hesitancy was determined by reviewing the mother-child protection card for the presence of delay or refusal of the recommended vaccine. A face-to-face interview was conducted to obtain demographics and WHO-SAGE variables from the participants. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to associate independent variables (demographics and SAGE variables) with the dependent variable (vaccine hesitancy).

RESULTS

Out of 574 respondents, 161 mother's children were noted as vaccine-hesitant (refusal = 7; delay = 154); and the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 28.05%. The delay was observed in all recommended vaccines, but the refusal or reluctance was seen in only four vaccines (hepatitis B birth dose = 1; IPV 1 and 2 = 2; Measles 1 and 2 = 3; and Rota 1, 2, and 3 = 1). The respondents' demographics like no or lower parent education (OR = 3.17; 95%CI = 1.50-6.72) and fewer antenatal visits (OR = 2.30; 95%CI = 1.45-3.36) showed higher odds, whereas the upper socioeconomic status showed lower odds (OR = 0.09; 95%CI = 0.02-0.36) toward vaccine hesitancy. The WHO-SAGE dimensions like awareness (OR = 0.14; 95%CI = 0.03-0.53), poor access (OR = 7.76; 95%CI = 3.65-16.51), and low acceptability of the individual (OR = 07.15; 95%CI = 1.87-27.29), community (OR = 6.21; 95%CI = 1.58-24.33) were significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was high. Vaccine safety and children's health are primary concerns for parents' refusal/reluctance. To achieve 100% immunization coverage, policymakers need to reduce vaccine hesitancy by developing strategies based on demographic and WHO-SAGE working group predictors.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)指出,疫苗犹豫是全球公共卫生面临的十大威胁之一。有证据表明,印度针对疫苗犹豫的研究有限,且多针对单一疫苗。本研究旨在通过探索人口统计学因素与全球疫苗安全咨询委员会(SAGE)相关因素对疫苗犹豫的影响,填补这一空白。

材料与方法

在印度安得拉邦巴瑟拉帕利一家拥有330张床位的非政府组织(NGO)医院开展了一项基于医院的横断面分析研究。纳入在儿科或妇产科门诊就诊的五岁以下儿童的母亲。共招募了574名母亲,并通过查看母子保健卡中是否存在推荐疫苗延迟接种或拒绝接种的情况来确定疫苗犹豫情况。通过面对面访谈获取参与者的人口统计学信息和WHO-SAGE变量。进行二元逻辑回归分析,以将自变量(人口统计学因素和SAGE变量)与因变量(疫苗犹豫)相关联。

结果

在574名受访者中,有161名母亲的孩子被记录为有疫苗犹豫(拒绝接种 = 7例;延迟接种 = 154例);疫苗犹豫的患病率为28.05%。所有推荐疫苗均出现了延迟接种情况,但仅在四种疫苗中出现了拒绝或不情愿接种的情况(乙肝首剂 = 1例;脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗第1剂和第2剂 = 2例;麻疹第1剂和第2剂 = 3例;轮状病毒疫苗第1剂、第2剂和第3剂 = 1例)。受访者的人口统计学因素,如父母未接受教育或受教育程度较低(比值比[OR] = 3.17;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.50 - 6.72)和产前检查次数较少(OR = 2.30;95%CI = 1.45 - 3.36)显示出较高的疫苗犹豫几率,而社会经济地位较高者的疫苗犹豫几率较低(OR = 0.09;95%CI = 0.02 - 0.36)。WHO-SAGE维度,如认知度(OR = 0.14;95%CI = 0.03 - 0.53)、获取不便(OR = 7.76;95%CI = 3.65 - 16.51)以及个人(OR = 7.15;95%CI = 1.87 - 27.29)、社区(OR = 6.21;95%CI = 1.58 - 24.33)的低接受度与疫苗犹豫显著相关。

结论

该研究得出结论,疫苗犹豫的患病率较高。疫苗安全性和儿童健康是家长拒绝/不情愿接种疫苗的主要担忧。为实现100%的免疫覆盖率,政策制定者需要根据人口统计学因素和WHO-SAGE工作组预测指标制定策略,以减少疫苗犹豫。

相似文献

4
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and influence of professional medical guidance.新冠病毒疫苗犹豫现象及专业医学指导的影响
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Apr 28;11:112. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_792_21. eCollection 2022.
2
Vaccine hesitancy and coronavirus disease-19: Where do we stand?疫苗犹豫与冠状病毒病-19:我们目前的状况如何?
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Feb 26;11:59. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_642_21. eCollection 2022.
5
Demographics of Vaccine Hesitancy in Chandigarh, India.印度昌迪加尔疫苗犹豫现象的人口统计学特征
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 15;7:585579. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.585579. eCollection 2020.
6
Routine Vaccination Coverage - Worldwide, 2019.2019年全球常规疫苗接种覆盖率
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 13;69(45):1706-1710. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6945a7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验