• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接触时间和消毒剂配方对消毒纸巾杀灭硬、非多孔表面的耳念珠菌的效果有显著影响。

Contact time and disinfectant formulation significantly impact the efficacies of disinfectant towelettes against Candida auris on hard, non-porous surfaces.

机构信息

Department of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47906, USA.

Diversey Inc., Charlotte, NC, 28273, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 10;13(1):5849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32876-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-32876-y
PMID:37037898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10086017/
Abstract

There has been an increase in Candida auris healthcare-associated infections, which result from cross-contamination from surfaces and equipment. In this study, we tested the efficacies of EPA-registered disinfectant towelettes products that are increasingly used for infection control against C. auris at a range of contact times following modifications to standard EPA protocol MB-33-00. Hydrogen peroxide (HP)-based disinfectant towelettes were more efficacious against C. auris than the quaternary ammonium chloride (QAC)-alcohol-based disinfectant towelettes irrespective of tested contact times. Thirty s contact time was significantly less effective in reducing C. auris compared to 1-, 2-, 3-, and 10-min contact times. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the level of disinfection among 1-min and longer contact times regardless of product chemistry. None of the products achieved a standard six-log reduction at any tested contact times. Overall, the HP-based disinfectant towelette was significantly more fungicidal than the QAC-alcohol-based disinfectant towelette. For all product types, 30 s contact time did not achieve the same level of disinfection as 1-min or longer contact times. Overall, disinfectant towelette efficacy is dependent upon product formulation and contact time.

摘要

已经有越来越多的耳念珠菌(Candida auris)与医疗保健相关的感染,这些感染源自表面和设备的交叉污染。在这项研究中,我们测试了 EPA 注册的消毒湿巾产品的功效,这些产品在修改了 EPA 标准协议 MB-33-00 后,在不同的接触时间下,越来越多地用于控制感染。过氧化氢(HP)基消毒剂湿巾对耳念珠菌的杀灭效果优于季铵盐-酒精基消毒剂湿巾,无论测试的接触时间如何。与 1、2、3 和 10 分钟的接触时间相比,30 秒的接触时间在减少耳念珠菌方面的效果明显较差。然而,无论产品化学性质如何,在 1 分钟及更长时间的接触时间内,消毒水平没有统计学上的显著差异。在任何测试的接触时间内,没有一种产品达到标准的六对数减少。总体而言,HP 基消毒剂湿巾比季铵盐-酒精基消毒剂湿巾具有更强的杀菌作用。对于所有产品类型,30 秒的接触时间都无法达到 1 分钟或更长时间接触时间的消毒水平。总的来说,消毒剂湿巾的功效取决于产品配方和接触时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/5d734f0ad437/41598_2023_32876_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/5182b3cfc94a/41598_2023_32876_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/1675c3dcd924/41598_2023_32876_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/b09c8cea0639/41598_2023_32876_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/5d734f0ad437/41598_2023_32876_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/5182b3cfc94a/41598_2023_32876_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/1675c3dcd924/41598_2023_32876_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/b09c8cea0639/41598_2023_32876_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fc8/10086017/5d734f0ad437/41598_2023_32876_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Contact time and disinfectant formulation significantly impact the efficacies of disinfectant towelettes against Candida auris on hard, non-porous surfaces.接触时间和消毒剂配方对消毒纸巾杀灭硬、非多孔表面的耳念珠菌的效果有显著影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 10;13(1):5849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32876-y.
2
Surface area wiped, product type, and target strain impact bactericidal efficacy of ready-to-use disinfectant Towelettes.擦拭面积、产品类型和目标菌株会影响即用型消毒巾的杀菌效果。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Oct 11;7:122. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0416-z. eCollection 2018.
3
There is no additional bactericidal efficacy of Environmental Protection Agency-registered disinfectant towelettes after surface drying or beyond label contact time.用美国环保署注册的消毒湿巾擦拭物体表面并干燥后,或者超过标签规定的接触时间,其杀菌效果不会增强。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Jan;47(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
4
Contact time has limited impact on the efficacy of disinfectant towelettes when tested under conditions reflective of realistic use.接触时间对符合实际使用情况的条件下测试的消毒湿巾的功效影响有限。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Jul 16;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01266-4.
5
The effectiveness of surface disinfectants and a micellic HO based water disinfectant on Candida auris.表面消毒剂和基于胶束 HO 的水消毒剂对耳念珠菌的有效性。
J Mycol Med. 2021 Dec;31(4):101178. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2021.101178. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
6
Different efficacies of common disinfection methods against candida auris and other candida species.常见消毒方法对耳念珠菌和其他念珠菌属种的不同杀菌效果。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 May;13(5):730-736. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.01.008. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
7
Cross-contamination by disinfectant towelettes varies by product chemistry and strain.消毒湿巾的交叉污染因产品化学性质和菌株而异。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Aug 24;9(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00797-4.
8
Disinfectant wipes transfer Clostridioides difficile spores from contaminated surfaces to uncontaminated surfaces during the disinfection process.消毒湿巾在消毒过程中会将艰难梭菌孢子从污染表面转移到未污染表面。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Nov 4;9(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00844-0.
9
Evaluation of nine surface disinfectants against using a quantitative disk carrier method: EPA SOP-MB-35.采用定量圆盘载体法对九种表面消毒剂杀灭 的效果评价:EPA SOP-MB-35。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;41(10):1219-1221. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.278. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
10
Hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite disinfectants are more effective against and biofilms than quaternary ammonium compounds.过氧化氢和次氯酸钠消毒剂比季铵盐化合物更能有效对抗 和 生物膜。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Dec 17;7:154. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0447-5. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Brown locusts, Locustana pardalina, host fluconazole-resistant Candidozyma (Candida) auris, closely related to Clade III clinical strains.褐飞蝗(Locustana pardalina)携带对氟康唑耐药的耳念珠菌(Candidozyma (Candida) auris),该菌与进化枝III临床菌株密切相关。
Med Mycol. 2025 Aug 5;63(8). doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaf069.
2
Current Overview of Environmental Disinfection and Decolonization of : A Systematic Review from 2020 to 2025.环境消毒与去定植的当前概述:2020年至2025年的系统评价
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2025 Jun 2;10(6):155. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed10060155.
3
Effect of Antimicrobial Wipes on Hospital-Associated Bacterial and Fungal Strains.

本文引用的文献

1
Hydrogen peroxide, sodium dichloro-s-triazinetriones and quaternary alcohols significantly inactivate the dry-surface biofilms of and more than quaternary ammoniums.过氧化氢、二氯代三嗪三酮和季铵盐醇能显著失活 和 的干燥表面生物膜,效果强于季铵盐。
Microbiology (Reading). 2022 Mar;168(3). doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001140.
2
Is the superbug fungus really so scary? A systematic review and meta-analysis of global epidemiology and mortality of Candida auris.超级真菌真的那么可怕吗?全球流行病学和 Candida auris 死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):827. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-05543-0.
3
Cross-contamination by disinfectant towelettes varies by product chemistry and strain.
抗菌湿巾对医院相关细菌和真菌菌株的影响。
Infect Chemother. 2024 Dec;56(4):522-533. doi: 10.3947/ic.2024.0097.
4
Variable sensitivity of clinical Candida auris strains to Biocides: implications for infection control in Healthcare Settings.临床假丝酵母菌菌株对消毒剂的可变敏感性:对医疗机构感染控制的影响。
BMC Microbiol. 2024 Nov 4;24(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03605-w.
5
Skin and hard surface disinfection against - What we know today.针对……的皮肤和硬表面消毒——我们如今所了解的情况。 (原英文文本表述不完整,推测可能是针对某种病原体等的消毒,但仅根据现有文本只能这样翻译)
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 7;11:1312929. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1312929. eCollection 2024.
消毒湿巾的交叉污染因产品化学性质和菌株而异。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020 Aug 24;9(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00797-4.
4
Evaluation of nine surface disinfectants against using a quantitative disk carrier method: EPA SOP-MB-35.采用定量圆盘载体法对九种表面消毒剂杀灭 的效果评价:EPA SOP-MB-35。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;41(10):1219-1221. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.278. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
What Have We Learned About Its Mechanisms of Pathogenicity?我们对其致病机制有哪些了解?
Front Microbiol. 2018 Dec 12;9:3081. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03081. eCollection 2018.
6
Surface area wiped, product type, and target strain impact bactericidal efficacy of ready-to-use disinfectant Towelettes.擦拭面积、产品类型和目标菌株会影响即用型消毒巾的杀菌效果。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Oct 11;7:122. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0416-z. eCollection 2018.
7
Impact of test protocols and material binding on the efficacy of antimicrobial wipes.测试方案和材料结合对消毒湿巾功效的影响。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):e25-e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Strain, disinfectant, concentration, and contact time quantitatively impact disinfectant efficacy.菌株、消毒剂、浓度和接触时间会定量影响消毒剂的功效。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Apr 3;7:49. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0340-2. eCollection 2018.
9
Alcohols as Surface Disinfectants in Healthcare Settings.醇类在医疗机构环境中的表面消毒剂。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;39(3):323-328. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.301. Epub 2018 Jan 28.
10
Effectiveness of Disinfectants Against Candida auris and Other Candida Species.消毒剂对耳念珠菌和其他念珠菌属种的有效性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;38(10):1240-1243. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.162. Epub 2017 Aug 10.