• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院基础设施网络风险损失分布框架:混合随机图方法上的键渗流

Framework for cyber risk loss distribution of hospital infrastructure: Bond percolation on mixed random graphs approach.

作者信息

Chiaradonna Stefano, Jevtić Petar, Lanchier Nicolas

机构信息

School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2023 Dec;43(12):2450-2485. doi: 10.1111/risa.14127. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1111/risa.14127
PMID:37038249
Abstract

Networks like those of healthcare infrastructure have been a primary target of cyberattacks for over a decade. From just a single cyberattack, a healthcare facility would expect to see millions of dollars in losses from legal fines, business interruption, and loss of revenue. As more medical devices become interconnected, more cyber vulnerabilities emerge, resulting in more potential exploitation that may disrupt patient care and give rise to catastrophic financial losses. In this paper, we propose a structural model of an aggregate loss distribution across multiple cyberattacks on a prototypical hospital network. Modeled as a mixed random graph, the hospital network consists of various patient-monitoring devices and medical imaging equipment as random nodes to account for the variable occupancy of patient rooms and availability of imaging equipment that are connected by bidirectional edges to fixed hospital and radiological information systems. Our framework accounts for the documented cyber vulnerabilities of a hospital's trusted internal network of its major medical assets. To our knowledge, there exist no other models of an aggregate loss distribution for cyber risk in this setting. We contextualize the problem in the probabilistic graph-theoretical framework using a percolation model and combinatorial techniques to compute the mean and variance of the loss distribution for a mixed random network with associated random costs that can be useful for healthcare administrators and cybersecurity professionals to improve cybersecurity management strategies. By characterizing this distribution, we allow for the further utility of pricing cyber risk.

摘要

十多年来,医疗保健基础设施网络一直是网络攻击的主要目标。仅一次网络攻击,医疗保健机构就可能因法律罚款、业务中断和收入损失而遭受数百万美元的损失。随着越来越多的医疗设备相互连接,出现了更多的网络漏洞,导致更多潜在的被利用情况,这可能会扰乱患者护理并造成灾难性的财务损失。在本文中,我们提出了一个关于典型医院网络遭受多次网络攻击时总损失分布的结构模型。医院网络被建模为一个混合随机图,由各种患者监测设备和医学成像设备作为随机节点组成,以考虑病房的可变占用情况和成像设备的可用性,这些设备通过双向边连接到固定的医院和放射信息系统。我们的框架考虑了医院主要医疗资产可信内部网络中已记录的网络漏洞。据我们所知,在这种情况下,不存在其他关于网络风险总损失分布的模型。我们在概率图论框架中使用渗流模型和组合技术来计算具有相关随机成本的混合随机网络损失分布的均值和方差,这对于医疗保健管理人员和网络安全专业人员改进网络安全管理策略可能是有用的。通过对这种分布进行特征描述,我们为网络风险定价提供了进一步的效用。

相似文献

1
Framework for cyber risk loss distribution of hospital infrastructure: Bond percolation on mixed random graphs approach.医院基础设施网络风险损失分布框架:混合随机图方法上的键渗流
Risk Anal. 2023 Dec;43(12):2450-2485. doi: 10.1111/risa.14127. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional).医院网络安全风险与差距:综述(面向非网络专业人员)
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 11;4:862221. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862221. eCollection 2022.
3
Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.人为因素对医疗机构网络安全的影响:系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;21(15):5119. doi: 10.3390/s21155119.
4
Cybersecurity in Hospitals: A Systematic, Organizational Perspective.医院中的网络安全:系统的组织视角
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 28;20(5):e10059. doi: 10.2196/10059.
5
A Cyber Risk Assessment Approach to Federated Identity Management Framework-Based Digital Healthcare System.基于联合身份管理框架的数字医疗系统的网络风险评估方法
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;24(16):5282. doi: 10.3390/s24165282.
6
A Bayesian Framework for the Analysis and Optimal Mitigation of Cyber Threats to Cyber-Physical Systems.用于分析和优化缓解对网络物理系统的网络威胁的贝叶斯框架。
Risk Anal. 2022 Oct;42(10):2275-2290. doi: 10.1111/risa.13900. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
We need to aim at the top: Factors associated with cybersecurity awareness of cyber and information security decision-makers.我们需要瞄准高端:与网络和信息安全决策者的网络安全意识相关的因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 18;19(10):e0312266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312266. eCollection 2024.
8
The relationship between cybersecurity ratings and the risk of hospital data breaches.网络安全评级与医院数据泄露风险之间的关系。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2085-2092. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab142.
9
Economic Impact of a Hospital Cyberattack in a National Health System: Descriptive Case Study.国家卫生系统中医院网络攻击的经济影响:描述性案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 30;7:e41738. doi: 10.2196/41738.
10
Transforming Healthcare Cybersecurity from Reactive to Proactive: Current Status and Future Recommendations.从被动到主动:医疗保健网络安全的转变现状与未来建议。
J Med Syst. 2020 Apr 2;44(5):98. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1507-y.