• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙型肝炎病毒抗体水平对慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的诊断意义。

The diagnostic significance of hepatitis C virus antibody levels for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital of Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Intern Med. 2023 May;38(3):362-371. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.350. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

DOI:10.3904/kjim.2022.350
PMID:37038262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10175861/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) assay is widely used to screen for HCV infection, it has a high false-positive (FP) rate in low-risk populations. We investigated the accuracy of anti-HCV signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratio to distinguish true-positive (TP) from FP HCV infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 77,571 patients with anti-HCV results. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of anti-HCV S/CO ratio in anti-HCV positive patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,126 patients tested anti-HCV positive; 34.7% of patients were FP based on HCV RNA and/or recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) results. The age and sex-adjusted anti-HCV prevalence was 1.22%. We identified significant differences in serum aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase levels, anti-HCV S/CO ratio, and RIBA results between groups (viremia vs. non-viremia, TP vs. FP). Using ROC curves, the optimal cutoff values of anti-HCV S/CO ratio for HCV viremia and TP were 8 and 5, respectively. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 0.970 (95% CI, 0.959-0.982, p < 0.001), 99.7%, 87.5%, 87.4%, and 99.7%, respectively, for predicting HCV viremia at an anti-HCV S/CO ratio of 8 and 0.987 (95% CI, 0.980-0.994, p < 0.001), 95.3%, 94.7%, 97.1%, and 91.4%, respectively, for TP HCV infection at an anti-HCV S/CO ratio of 5. No patients with HCV viremia had an anti-HCV S/CO ratio below 5.

CONCLUSION

The anti-HCV S/CO ratio is highly accurate for discriminating TP from FP HCV infection and should be considered when diagnosing HCV infections.

摘要

背景/目的:尽管抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)检测已广泛用于筛查 HCV 感染,但在低危人群中其假阳性(FP)率较高。本研究旨在探讨抗-HCV 信号与对照(S/CO)比值鉴别真阳性(TP)与 FP HCV 感染的准确性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 77571 例抗-HCV 检测结果。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估抗-HCV S/CO 比值在抗-HCV 阳性患者中的诊断准确性。

结果

共有 1126 例患者抗-HCV 检测阳性,其中 34.7%的患者 HCV RNA 和/或重组免疫印迹分析(RIBA)结果为 FP。年龄和性别校正后的抗-HCV 阳性率为 1.22%。我们发现,在病毒血症与非病毒血症组、TP 与 FP 组间,血清天门冬氨酸转氨酶和丙氨酸转氨酶水平、抗-HCV S/CO 比值和 RIBA 结果均存在显著差异。ROC 曲线分析显示,抗-HCV S/CO 比值预测 HCV 病毒血症和 TP 的最佳截断值分别为 8 和 5。其 ROC 曲线下面积、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 0.970(95%CI:0.959-0.982,p < 0.001)、99.7%、87.5%、87.4%和 99.7%,用于预测抗-HCV S/CO 比值为 8 时的 HCV 病毒血症,分别为 0.987(95%CI:0.980-0.994,p < 0.001)、95.3%、94.7%、97.1%和 91.4%,用于预测抗-HCV S/CO 比值为 5 时的 TP HCV 感染。无病毒血症患者的抗-HCV S/CO 比值均<5。

结论

抗-HCV S/CO 比值在鉴别 TP 与 FP HCV 感染方面具有较高的准确性,在诊断 HCV 感染时应加以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/e8b177c30dd3/kjim-2022-350f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/452fcfda1821/kjim-2022-350f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/f98c40f2fbb3/kjim-2022-350f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/3fd40e6ceedc/kjim-2022-350f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/44b0e465e92b/kjim-2022-350f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/e8b177c30dd3/kjim-2022-350f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/452fcfda1821/kjim-2022-350f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/f98c40f2fbb3/kjim-2022-350f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/3fd40e6ceedc/kjim-2022-350f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/44b0e465e92b/kjim-2022-350f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aadd/10175861/e8b177c30dd3/kjim-2022-350f5.jpg

相似文献

1
The diagnostic significance of hepatitis C virus antibody levels for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.丙型肝炎病毒抗体水平对慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的诊断意义。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 May;38(3):362-371. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.350. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Improved reflexive testing algorithm for hepatitis C infection using signal-to-cutoff ratios of a hepatitis C virus antibody assay.基于丙型肝炎病毒抗体检测的信号-截断比值的丙型肝炎感染自动反射性检测算法的改进。
Clin Chem. 2011 Jul;57(7):1050-6. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.158691. Epub 2011 May 12.
3
Evaluation of Architect anti-HCV Signal to Cutoff Ratios for Predicting Hepatitis C Viremia Using COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Quantitative Test.使用COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV定量检测评估Architect抗-HCV信号与临界值比值对丙型肝炎病毒血症的预测价值
Clin Lab. 2020 Aug 1;66(8). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.191208.
4
Significance of anti-HCV signal-to-cutoff ratio in predicting hepatitis C viremia.抗 HCV 信号-截止值比值在预测丙型肝炎病毒血症中的意义。
Korean J Intern Med. 2009 Dec;24(4):302-8. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2009.24.4.302. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
5
[Investigation of Anti-HCV S/CO Value in Detecting Viremia in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection].[丙型肝炎病毒感染患者抗-HCV S/CO值检测病毒血症的研究]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020 Jan;54(1):110-119. doi: 10.5578/mb.68833.
6
Evaluation of biochemical, hematological, RIBA and PCR assays in predicting viremia in anti-HCV positive patients.评估生化、血液学、重组免疫印迹试验(RIBA)和聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测在预测抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)阳性患者病毒血症中的作用。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2019 Aug 31;13(8):736-743. doi: 10.3855/jidc.11426.
7
Utilization of Signal-to-Cutoff Ratio of Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Assay in Predicting HCV Viremia among Hemodialysis Patients.丙型肝炎病毒抗体检测的信号与临界值比值在预测血液透析患者丙型肝炎病毒血症中的应用
Nephron. 2015;130(2):127-33. doi: 10.1159/000430988. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
8
Prevalence and significance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia in HCV antibody-positive subjects from various populations.不同人群中丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体阳性者的HCV病毒血症患病率及其意义。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 May;31(5):1189-93. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.5.1189-1193.1993.
9
The usefulness of anti-HCV signal to cut-off ratio in predicting hepatitis C viremia and the effect of genotype differences on signal to cut-off ratio.抗 HCV 信号与临界比值在预测丙型肝炎病毒血症中的作用及基因型差异对信号与临界比值的影响。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Sep 2;70(8):e20240370. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240370. eCollection 2024.
10
Reflex threshold of signal-to-cut-off ratios of the Elecsys anti-HCV II assay for hepatitis C virus infection.Elecsys抗-HCV II检测法检测丙型肝炎病毒感染时信号与截断值比率的反射阈值。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016 Sep 30;10(9):1031-1034. doi: 10.3855/jidc.7301.

引用本文的文献

1
Detection of anti-HCV antibodies in the clinical classification and epidemiological surveillance of HCV infection.丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染临床分类及流行病学监测中抗-HCV抗体的检测
Mol Biol Rep. 2025 Jul 17;52(1):730. doi: 10.1007/s11033-025-10827-2.
2
Glycylglycine promotes the solubility and antigenic utility of recombinant HCV structural proteins in a point-of-care immunoassay for detection of active viremia.甘氨酰甘氨酸可提高重组 HCV 结构蛋白在即时检测活动病毒血症的免疫分析中的可溶性和抗原性。
Microb Cell Fact. 2024 Jan 18;23(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12934-024-02297-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Global change in hepatitis C virus prevalence and cascade of care between 2015 and 2020: a modelling study.全球丙型肝炎病毒流行率的变化和 2015 年至 2020 年期间的治疗流程:建模研究。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 May;7(5):396-415. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00472-6. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
2
Comparative evaluation of Elecsys, Atellica, and Alinity assays for measuring the anti-Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody.Elecsys、Atellica 和 Alinity 检测系统测定抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体的比较评估。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Aug;141:104910. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104910. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
3
The role of a two-assay serological testing strategy for anti-HCV screening in low-prevalence populations.
两阶段血清学检测策略在低流行人群抗 HCV 筛查中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 22;11(1):8689. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88138-2.
4
Simplification of Care for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection.简化慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染的治疗。
Semin Liver Dis. 2020 Nov;40(4):392-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713657. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
5
Prevalence, Awareness, and Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in South Korea: Evidence from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.韩国丙型肝炎病毒感染的流行率、知晓率和治疗率:来自韩国国家健康和营养检查调查的证据。
Gut Liver. 2020 Sep 15;14(5):644-651. doi: 10.5009/gnl19272.
6
Hepatitis C Guidance 2019 Update: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection.《2019年丙型肝炎指南更新:美国肝病研究协会-美国传染病学会关于丙型肝炎病毒感染检测、管理及治疗的建议》
Hepatology. 2020 Feb;71(2):686-721. doi: 10.1002/hep.31060.
7
Accelerating the elimination of viral hepatitis: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission.加速消除病毒性肝炎:柳叶刀胃肠病学和肝脏病学委员会报告
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;4(2):135-184. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30270-X.
8
The Role of the Signal-to-Cutoff Ratio in Automated Anti-HCV Chemiluminescent Immunoassays by Referring to the Nucleic Acid Amplification Test and the Recombinant Immunoblot Assay.信号-截止值比值在 HCV 化学发光免疫分析自动化中的作用,参照核酸扩增试验和重组免疫印迹分析。
Ann Lab Med. 2018 Sep;38(5):466-472. doi: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.466.
9
Retrospective analysis on the diagnostic performances and signal-to-cut-off ratios of the Elecsys Anti-HCV II assay.Elecsys 抗-HCV II 检测法诊断性能及信号与临界值比率的回顾性分析。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2018 Jan;32(1). doi: 10.1002/jcla.22165. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Predicting factors of present hepatitis C virus infection among patients positive for the hepatitis C virus antibody.预测丙型肝炎病毒抗体阳性患者现患丙型肝炎病毒感染的因素。
Clin Mol Hepatol. 2013 Dec;19(4):376-81. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2013.19.4.376. Epub 2013 Dec 28.