• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在疫情下,信任能给节日带来满足感吗?

Can Trust Bring Satisfaction to the Festival Under Pandemic?

作者信息

Liu Jiamin, Leou Eusebio Chiahsin, Chen Chaozhan, Li Xi

机构信息

Chengdu University of Information Technology, China.

City University of Macau, Taipa, China.

出版信息

Sage Open. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):21582440221147248. doi: 10.1177/21582440221147248. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.1177/21582440221147248
PMID:37038434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10076181/
Abstract

In existing festival research, trust is often placed at the post-experience stage by scholars, and there is no research to explore the relationship between festivalscape, trust, and experience. In addition, the main function of trust is to reduce uncertainty and risk perception. Existing festival-related research scenarios do not have typical risks, which will limit the findings of the research. This research focuses on festivals under covid-19 pandemic, which is a typical risky scenario. Exploring the antecedent variables and the consequences of the trust of the festival participants in this context may therefore make up the deficiency of existing research. Several interesting findings have been made: the perception of the festivalscape during the pandemic has been significantly simplified. Epidemic prevention measures and staff may increase trust, but trust cannot have a direct and significant impact on festival satisfaction. While staff positively strengthen trust, they will have a significant negative impact on satisfaction.

摘要

在现有的节日研究中,学者们往往将信任置于体验后的阶段,且没有研究探讨节日景观、信任和体验之间的关系。此外,信任的主要功能是减少不确定性和风险感知。现有的与节日相关的研究场景没有典型风险,这会限制研究结果。本研究聚焦于新冠疫情下的节日,这是一个典型的风险场景。因此,在这种背景下探索节日参与者信任的前因变量和后果可能会弥补现有研究的不足。研究有几个有趣的发现:疫情期间对节日景观的感知已显著简化。防疫措施和工作人员可能会增加信任,但信任对节日满意度不会产生直接且显著的影响。虽然工作人员会积极增强信任,但他们会对满意度产生显著的负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193b/10076181/64288479d4d4/10.1177_21582440221147248-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193b/10076181/8756c820c4e2/10.1177_21582440221147248-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193b/10076181/64288479d4d4/10.1177_21582440221147248-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193b/10076181/8756c820c4e2/10.1177_21582440221147248-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/193b/10076181/64288479d4d4/10.1177_21582440221147248-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Can Trust Bring Satisfaction to the Festival Under Pandemic?在疫情下,信任能给节日带来满足感吗?
Sage Open. 2023 Jan 9;13(1):21582440221147248. doi: 10.1177/21582440221147248. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
2
Examining the Role of Service Quality, Perceived Values, and Trust in Macau Food Festival.审视服务质量、感知价值和信任在澳门美食节中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 1;18(17):9214. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179214.
3
Political Trust and Festival Attachment: Influencing Residents' Engagement in Traditional Festivals.政治信任与节日依恋:影响居民对传统节日的参与度
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 5;13(9):741. doi: 10.3390/bs13090741.
4
Constructing the festival tourist attraction from the perspective of Peircean semiotics: The case of Guangzhou, China.从皮尔士符号学角度构建节日旅游景点:以中国广州为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0282102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282102. eCollection 2023.
5
Exploration of Leisure Constraints Perception in the Context of a Pandemic: An Empirical Study of the Macau Light Festival.疫情背景下休闲限制感知的探索:以澳门光影节为例的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 18;13:822208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822208. eCollection 2022.
6
Do Informal Social Ties and Local Festival Participation Relate to Subjective Well-Being?非正式社会关系和当地节日参与与主观幸福感有关吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):16. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010016.
7
Protecting mass-gathering events in a pandemic with testing tracks and transparent information: an experimental study with festival guests.通过检测追踪和透明信息在大流行期间保护大型聚集活动:一项针对节日参与者的实验研究
Psychol Health. 2025 Jul;40(7):1198-1224. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2024.2305644. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
8
Folk Festivals as Restorative Environments Based on Attention Restoration Theory-The Roles of Liminal Experience and Timing.基于注意力恢复理论的民俗节日作为恢复性环境——阈限体验和时间安排的作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 May 29;16:1957-1973. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S411960. eCollection 2023.
9
Tracing memories and meanings of festival landscapes during the COVID-19 pandemic.追溯新冠疫情期间节日景观的记忆与意义
Emot Space Soc. 2022 Aug;44:100903. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2022.100903. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
10
Analyzing Risk Communication, Trust, Risk Perception, Negative Emotions, and Behavioral Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China Using a Structural Equation Model.采用结构方程模型分析中国 COVID-19 大流行期间的风险沟通、信任、风险感知、负面情绪和行为应对策略。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 30;10:843787. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843787. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Social distancing, trust and post-COVID-19 recovery.社交距离、信任与新冠疫情后的复苏
Tour Manag. 2022 Feb;88:104416. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104416. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
2
Travel decision determinants during and after COVID-19: The role of tourist trust, travel constraints, and attitudinal factors.新冠疫情期间及之后的旅行决策决定因素:游客信任、旅行限制和态度因素的作用。
Tour Manag. 2022 Feb;88:104428. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104428. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
3
Reducing perceived health risk to attract hotel customers in the COVID-19 pandemic era: Focused on technology innovation for social distancing and cleanliness.
在新冠疫情时代降低感知健康风险以吸引酒店顾客:聚焦于社交距离和清洁方面的技术创新
Int J Hosp Manag. 2020 Oct;91:102664. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102664. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Creating a safe haven during the crisis: How organizations can achieve deep compliance with COVID-19 safety measures in the hospitality industry.在危机期间打造一个安全空间:组织如何在酒店业深度遵守新冠疫情安全措施。
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102662. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102662. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
5
The Cummings effect: politics, trust, and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic.卡明斯效应:新冠疫情期间的政治、信任与行为
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):464-465. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31690-1. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Public Trust and Compliance with the Precautionary Measures Against COVID-19 Employed by Authorities in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯当局采取的针对新冠疫情的预防措施的公众信任度与遵守情况。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Jul 8;13:753-760. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S257287. eCollection 2020.
7
Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research.旅游业与新冠疫情:对推动和重塑行业及研究的影响与启示
J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:312-321. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Regulation and Trust: 3-Month Follow-up Study on COVID-19 Mortality in 25 European Countries.监管与信任:25 个欧洲国家 COVID-19 死亡率的 3 个月随访研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 24;6(2):e19218. doi: 10.2196/19218.
9
Communicating Recommendations in Public Health Emergencies: The Role of Public Health Authorities.突发公共卫生事件中的建议传播:公共卫生当局的作用。
Health Secur. 2020 Jan/Feb;18(1):21-28. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0073.
10
Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates.信任与团队绩效:主效应、调节变量和协变量的元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Aug;101(8):1134-50. doi: 10.1037/apl0000110. Epub 2016 Apr 28.