• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应力、针对新冠疫情的内生性政策应对措施及其对农场绩效的影响。

Resilience, endogenous policy responses to COVID-19, and their impacts on farm performance.

作者信息

Guedegbe Tharcisse, Adelaja Adesoji, George Justin

机构信息

Africa Fellow and Consultant at the World Bank, Washington DC, USA.

Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics (AFRE), Michigan State University (MSU), East Lansing, MI, USA.

出版信息

World Dev. 2023 Aug;168:106254. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106254. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106254
PMID:37038591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10076512/
Abstract

Policy measures aimed at containing the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic had unintended consequences on economic activities globally. In this study, we isolate and investigate the short-term partial impacts of six such measures on the farm and nonfarm incomes of agricultural households and examine the related resilience factors. Using Nigeria as a case study, we find that the COVID containment measures had mixed effects on farm and non-farm incomes in the short run. These varying effects are due to households' resilience and vulnerability factors, including land size, wealth, income diversification, involvement in processing activities, and reliance on hired labor. Our findings highlight the need for more targeted health crisis containment measures which consider the uniqueness, diversity, and regional heterogeneity of agriculture, especially the potential implications for farm viability.

摘要

旨在遏制新冠疫情传播的政策措施对全球经济活动产生了意想不到的后果。在本研究中,我们分离并调查了其中六项措施对农业家庭农场收入和非农场收入的短期局部影响,并考察了相关的恢复力因素。以尼日利亚为例,我们发现新冠疫情防控措施在短期内对农场收入和非农场收入产生了好坏参半的影响。这些不同的影响归因于家庭的恢复力和脆弱性因素,包括土地规模、财富、收入多样化、参与加工活动以及对雇佣劳动力的依赖。我们的研究结果凸显了采取更具针对性的健康危机防控措施的必要性,这些措施应考虑到农业的独特性、多样性和区域异质性,尤其是对农场生存能力的潜在影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ce/10076512/12b51181e6a8/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ce/10076512/12b51181e6a8/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ce/10076512/12b51181e6a8/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Resilience, endogenous policy responses to COVID-19, and their impacts on farm performance.适应力、针对新冠疫情的内生性政策应对措施及其对农场绩效的影响。
World Dev. 2023 Aug;168:106254. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106254. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
2
Initial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on Australian fisheries production, research organisations and assessment: shocks, responses and implications for decision support and resilience.2019年冠状病毒病疫情对澳大利亚渔业生产、研究机构及评估的初步影响:冲击、应对措施以及对决策支持和恢复力的影响
Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2023;33(2):513-534. doi: 10.1007/s11160-023-09760-z. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
3
Immediate impacts of COVID-19 crisis on agricultural and food systems in the Caribbean.新冠疫情危机对加勒比地区农业和粮食系统的直接影响。
Agric Syst. 2021 May;190:103106. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103106. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
4
COVID-19 and food security: Panel data evidence from Nigeria.新冠疫情与粮食安全:来自尼日利亚的面板数据证据
Food Policy. 2021 May;101:102099. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102099. Epub 2021 May 16.
5
Farm population of the United States: 1986.美国农业人口:1986年。
Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact. 1987 Nov(60):1-34.
6
The short-term impacts of COVID-19 on households in developing countries: An overview based on a harmonized dataset of high-frequency surveys.新冠疫情对发展中国家家庭的短期影响:基于高频调查统一数据集的概述
World Dev. 2022 May;153:105844. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105844. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
7
COVID-19, food insecurity and dietary diversity of households: Survey evidence from Nigeria.2019冠状病毒病、家庭粮食不安全与饮食多样性:来自尼日利亚的调查证据
Food Secur. 2023;15(1):219-241. doi: 10.1007/s12571-022-01312-w. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
8
Rural non-farm income diversification: implications on smallholder farmers' welfare and agricultural technology adoption in Ghana.农村非农业收入多元化:对加纳小农户福利及农业技术采用的影响
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 6;6(11):e05393. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05393. eCollection 2020 Nov.
9
Farmer surveys in Europe suggest that specialized, intensive farms were more likely to perceive negative impacts from COVID-19.欧洲的农民调查表明,专业化的集约化农场更有可能感受到新冠疫情带来的负面影响。
Agron Sustain Dev. 2022;42(5):84. doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00820-5. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
10
Discussing the regional-scale arable land use intensity and environmental risk triggered by the micro-scale rural households' differentiation based on step-by-step evaluation-a case study of Shandong Province, China.基于递进评价探讨微观尺度农户分化引发的区域尺度耕地利用强度与环境风险——以山东省为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(8):8271-8284. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07537-1. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Differing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on farmers and intermediaries: insights into the Ecuadorian cocoa value chain.新冠疫情对农民和中间商的不同影响:厄瓜多尔可可价值链洞察
Agric Food Econ. 2024;12(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40100-024-00302-0. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and food security: Panel data evidence from Nigeria.新冠疫情与粮食安全:来自尼日利亚的面板数据证据
Food Policy. 2021 May;101:102099. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102099. Epub 2021 May 16.
2
Determinants and dynamics of food insecurity during COVID-19 in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区新冠疫情期间粮食不安全的决定因素与动态变化
Food Policy. 2021 May;101:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102066. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
The coronavirus pandemic and food security: Evidence from Mali.冠状病毒大流行与粮食安全:来自马里的证据。
Food Policy. 2021 May;101:102050. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102050. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Response and resilience of Asian agrifood systems to COVID-19: An assessment across twenty-five countries and four regional farming and food systems.亚洲农业食品系统对新冠疫情的应对与恢复力:对25个国家和四个区域农业与粮食系统的评估
Agric Syst. 2021 Oct;193:103168. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103168. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
Perceived effects of COVID-19 restrictions on smallholder farmers: Evidence from seven lower- and middle-income countries.新冠疫情限制措施对小农户的感知影响:来自七个中低收入国家的证据。
Agric Syst. 2022 Apr;198:103367. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103367. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Household response to an extreme shock: Evidence on the immediate impact of the Covid-19 lockdown on economic outcomes and well-being in rural Uganda.家庭对极端冲击的反应:关于新冠疫情封锁对乌干达农村地区经济成果和福祉的直接影响的证据。
World Dev. 2021 Apr;140:105318. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105318. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
7
"Pivoting" by food industry firms to cope with COVID-19 in developing regions: E-commerce and "copivoting" delivery intermediaries.食品行业公司在发展中地区通过“转型”应对新冠疫情:电子商务与“协同转型”配送中介
Agric Econ. 2021 May;52(3):459-475. doi: 10.1111/agec.12631. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
8
Using crowd-sourced data for real-time monitoring of food prices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from a pilot project in northern Nigeria.利用众包数据对新冠疫情期间食品价格进行实时监测:来自尼日利亚北部一个试点项目的见解
Glob Food Sec. 2021 Jun;29:100523. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100523.
9
Food prices and marketing margins during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from vegetable value chains in Ethiopia.新冠疫情期间的食品价格与营销利润率:来自埃塞俄比亚蔬菜价值链的证据
Agric Econ. 2021 May;52(3):407-421. doi: 10.1111/agec.12626. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Global economic impacts of COVID-19 lockdown measures stand out in high-frequency shipping data.高频航运数据凸显了 COVID-19 封锁措施对全球经济的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0248818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248818. eCollection 2021.