Capano Giliberto, Verzichelli Luca, Vicentini Giulia
Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Social, Political and Cognitive Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Polit Stud Rev. 2023 Feb;21(1):63-81. doi: 10.1177/14789299211052896. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
The emergence of the COVID-19 outbreak can be considered a potential driver of changes not only in academic disciplines but also, as most observers underline, in the teaching mission of higher education. This raises the main question of this article, that is, exactly whether and how an external shock such as COVID-19 can impact the comprehensive profile of academic disciplines. By focusing on European political science, the article assesses the differences among scholars in this community in terms of potential long-term reactions. The study, based on the outcomes of an original survey conducted among 1400 European professional political scientists (EPSs) at the end of 2020, aims at detecting the "predisposition to adaptation" of the community, by examining the attitudes revealed by EPSs during the early phase of pandemic. In this regard, we focus on the explanations of different aspects of 'professional adaptation', discussing three dimensions that seem to be present in our sample, although with very different weights: passive, proactive and innovative adaptation.
新冠疫情的出现不仅可被视为学术学科发生变化的潜在驱动因素,而且正如大多数观察家所强调的,也是高等教育教学使命发生变化的潜在驱动因素。这就引出了本文的主要问题,即像新冠疫情这样的外部冲击究竟能否以及如何影响学术学科的综合概况。通过聚焦欧洲政治学,本文评估了该领域学者在潜在长期反应方面的差异。这项研究基于2020年底对1400名欧洲专业政治学家(EPS)进行的一项原创调查结果,旨在通过考察EPS在疫情早期阶段所展现出的态度,来检测该群体的“适应倾向”。在这方面,我们专注于对“职业适应”不同方面的解释,讨论我们样本中似乎存在的三个维度,尽管其权重差异很大:被动适应、主动适应和创新适应。