Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Department of Andrology, The Center for Men's Health, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Asian J Androl. 2023 Nov 1;25(6):725-730. doi: 10.4103/aja20234. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of rete testis thickness (RTT) and testicular shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate obstructive azoospermia (OA) from nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). We assessed 290 testes of 145 infertile males with azoospermia and 94 testes of 47 healthy volunteers at Shanghai General Hospital (Shanghai, China) between August 2019 and October 2021. The testicular volume (TV), SWE, and RTT were compared among patients with OA and NOA and healthy controls. The diagnostic performances of the three variables were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. The TV, SWE, and RTT in OA differed significantly from those in NOA (all P ≤ 0.001) but were similar to those in healthy controls. Males with OA and NOA were similar at TVs of 9-11 cm 3 ( P = 0.838), with sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and area under the curve of 50.0%, 84.2%, 0.34, and 0.662 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.502-0.799), respectively, for SWE cut-off of 3.1 kPa; and 94.1%, 79.2%, 0.74, and 0.904 (95% CI: 0.811-0.996), respectively, for RTT cut-off of 1.6 mm. The results showed that RTT performed significantly better than SWE in differentiating OA from NOA in the TV overlap range. In conclusion, ultrasonographic RTT evaluation proved a promising diagnostic approach to differentiate OA from NOA, particularly in the TV overlap range.
本研究旨在评估睾丸网厚度(RTT)和睾丸剪切波弹性成像(SWE)区分梗阻性无精子症(OA)与非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)的能力。我们评估了 2019 年 8 月至 2021 年 10 月期间上海总医院(上海,中国)的 145 名无精子症不育男性的 290 个睾丸和 47 名健康志愿者的 94 个睾丸。比较 OA 和 NOA 患者与健康对照组的睾丸体积(TV)、SWE 和 RTT。使用受试者工作特征曲线评估三个变量的诊断性能。OA 患者的 TV、SWE 和 RTT 与 NOA 患者的 TV、SWE 和 RTT 有显著差异(均 P ≤ 0.001),但与健康对照组的 TV、SWE 和 RTT 相似。OA 和 NOA 患者的 TV 在 9-11 cm 3 时相似(P = 0.838),SWE 截断值为 3.1 kPa 时,其敏感性、特异性、Youden 指数和曲线下面积分别为 50.0%、84.2%、0.34 和 0.662(95%置信区间[CI]:0.502-0.799);RTT 截断值为 1.6mm 时,敏感性、特异性、Youden 指数和曲线下面积分别为 94.1%、79.2%、0.74 和 0.904(95% CI:0.811-0.996)。结果表明,在 TV 重叠范围内,RTT 在区分 OA 和 NOA 方面的表现明显优于 SWE。总之,超声 RTT 评估证明是一种有前途的诊断方法,可用于区分 OA 和 NOA,尤其是在 TV 重叠范围内。