• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中美洲森林碳汇减少和生物群落稳定性下降的高昂经济代价。

High economic costs of reduced carbon sinks and declining biome stability in Central American forests.

机构信息

Chair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacherstr. 4, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 11;14(1):2043. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37796-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-37796-z
PMID:37041211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10090148/
Abstract

Tropical forests represent important supporting pillars for society, supplying global ecosystem services (ES), e.g., as carbon sinks for climate regulation and as crucial habitats for unique biodiversity. However, climate change impacts including implications for the economic value of these services have been rarely explored before. Here, we derive monetary estimates for the effect of climate change on climate regulation and habitat services for the forests of Central America. Our results projected ES declines in 24-62% of the study region with associated economic costs of $51-314 billion/year until 2100. These declines particularly affected montane and dry forests and had strong economic implications for Central America's lower-middle income countries (losses of up to 335% gross domestic product). In addition, economic losses were mostly higher for habitat services than for climate regulation. This highlights the need to expand the focus from mere maximization of CO sequestration and avoid false incentives from carbon markets.

摘要

热带雨林是社会的重要支撑,为全球生态系统服务(ES)提供支持,例如作为气候调节的碳汇和独特生物多样性的关键栖息地。然而,气候变化的影响,包括对这些服务的经济价值的影响,以前很少被探讨过。在这里,我们对中美洲森林的气候调节和栖息地服务的气候变化影响进行了货币估计。我们的研究结果预计,到 2100 年,研究区域内有 24-62%的地区的 ES 将下降,相关的经济成本为每年 5100 亿至 31400 亿美元。这些下降尤其影响了高山和干燥森林,对中美洲中低收入国家(高达 335%的国内生产总值损失)产生了强烈的经济影响。此外,与气候调节相比,栖息地服务的经济损失大多更高。这突显出需要扩大关注范围,不仅仅是最大限度地吸收二氧化碳,并避免碳市场的错误激励。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/1e0246fe4502/41467_2023_37796_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/c94eec442865/41467_2023_37796_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/a20728ab055c/41467_2023_37796_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/664fe7dc19a7/41467_2023_37796_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/1e0246fe4502/41467_2023_37796_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/c94eec442865/41467_2023_37796_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/a20728ab055c/41467_2023_37796_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/664fe7dc19a7/41467_2023_37796_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c63/10090148/1e0246fe4502/41467_2023_37796_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
High economic costs of reduced carbon sinks and declining biome stability in Central American forests.中美洲森林碳汇减少和生物群落稳定性下降的高昂经济代价。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 11;14(1):2043. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37796-z.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting.评估基于自然的解决方案以实现气候缓解和保护需要全面的碳核算。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144341. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144341. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
4
Anticipating changes in wildlife habitat induced by private forest owners' adaptation to climate change and carbon policy.预测私人森林所有者因适应气候变化和碳政策而导致的野生动物栖息地变化。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230525. eCollection 2020.
5
Carbon sequestration and biodiversity co-benefits of preserving forests in the western United States.美国西部保护森林的固碳和生物多样性协同效益。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Mar;30(2):e02039. doi: 10.1002/eap.2039. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
6
Mature Andean forests as globally important carbon sinks and future carbon refuges.成熟的安第斯森林是全球重要的碳汇和未来的碳避难所。
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 9;12(1):2138. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22459-8.
7
Carbon sequestration and climate change mitigation using macroalgae: a state of knowledge review.利用大型藻类进行碳固存和减缓气候变化:知识综述。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Dec;98(6):1945-1971. doi: 10.1111/brv.12990. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
8
Climate Variability Modulates the Temporal Stability of Carbon Sequestration by Changing Multiple Facets of Biodiversity in Temperate Forests Across Scales.气候变率通过改变温带森林中多尺度生物多样性的多个方面来调节碳固存的时间稳定性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Apr;31(4):e70212. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70212.
9
Contrasting forest management strategies: Impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services under changing climate and disturbance regimes.对比森林管理策略:在变化的气候和干扰制度下对生物多样性和生态系统服务的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;371:123124. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123124. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
10
A ranking of net national contributions to climate change mitigation through tropical forest conservation.通过热带森林保护对减缓气候变化的国家净贡献排名。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:575-581. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on Forest Carbon Sequestration and Its Economic Valuation: A Case Study of the Zixi Mountain Nature Reserve, Chuxiong Prefecture.森林碳汇及其经济价值研究:以楚雄州紫溪山自然保护区为例
Plants (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;14(17):2746. doi: 10.3390/plants14172746.
2
Sharp decline in future productivity of tropical reforestation above 29°C mean annual temperature.年平均气温高于 29°C 时,热带重新造林的未来生产力将大幅下降。
Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 25;9(34):eadg9175. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg9175. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change.亚马孙地区作为碳源与森林砍伐和气候变化有关。
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7867):388-393. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03629-6. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
2
What is Threatening Forests in Protected Areas? A Global Assessment of Deforestation in Protected Areas, 2001-2018.保护区内的森林面临哪些威胁?2001 - 2018年保护区森林砍伐情况的全球评估
Forests. 2020;11(5):539. doi: 10.3390/f11050539.
3
Large uncertainties in future biome changes in Africa call for flexible climate adaptation strategies.
未来非洲生物群落变化的巨大不确定性要求采取灵活的气候适应策略。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Jan;27(2):340-358. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15390. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO.整合由大气中二氧化碳增加导致陆地碳汇的证据。
New Phytol. 2021 Mar;229(5):2413-2445. doi: 10.1111/nph.16866. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Seasonal variation in net ecosystem CO exchange of a Brazilian seasonally dry tropical forest.巴西季节性干旱热带森林净生态系统 CO2 交换的季节变化。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 11;10(1):9454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66415-w.
6
Adopt a carbon tax to protect tropical forests.征收碳税以保护热带森林。
Nature. 2020 Feb;578(7794):213-216. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00324-w.
7
Higher than expected CO fertilization inferred from leaf to global observations.从叶片观测到全球观测推断出高于预期的二氧化碳施肥效应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Apr;26(4):2390-2402. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14950. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
8
Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action.将碳储存和生物多样性的协同效益进行映射,为保护政策和行动提供信息。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190128. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0128. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
9
Modeling trade-offs across carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, and equity in the distribution of global REDD+ funds.在全球 REDD+ 资金分配中,对碳固存、生物多样性保护和公平性进行权衡建模。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22645-22650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908683116. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Classifying drivers of global forest loss.全球森林损失的驱动因素分类。
Science. 2018 Sep 14;361(6407):1108-1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445.