Khairunisa Bela Haifa, Loganathan Usha, Ogejo Jactone A, Mukhopadhyay Biswarup
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology Ph.D. Program, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Environ Microbiome. 2023 Apr 11;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40793-023-00483-z.
Storing manure is an essential aspect of nutrient management on dairy farms. It presents the opportunity to use manure efficiently as a fertilizer in crop and pasture production. Typically, the manure storages are constructed as earthen, concrete, or steel-based structures. However, storing manure can potentially emit aerial pollutants to the atmosphere, including nitrogen and greenhouse gases, through microbial and physicochemical processes. We have characterized the composition of the microbiome in two manure storage structures, a clay-lined earthen pit and an aboveground concrete storage tank, on commercial dairy farms, to discern the nitrogen transformation processes, and thereby, inform the development of mitigation practices to preserve the value of manure. First, we analyzed the 16S rRNA-V4 amplicons generated from manure samples collected from several locations and depths (0.3, 1.2, and 2.1-2.75 m below the surface) of the storages, identifying a set of Amplicon Sequence Variant (ASVs) and quantifying their abundances. Then, we inferred the respective metabolic capabilities. These results showed that the manure microbiome composition was more complex and exhibited more location-to-location variation in the earthen pit than in the concrete tank. Further, the inlet and a location with hard surface crust in the earthen pit had unique consortia. The microbiomes in both storages had the potential to generate ammonia but lacked the organisms for oxidizing it to gaseous compounds. However, the microbial conversion of nitrate to gaseous N, NO, and NO via denitrification and to stable ammonia via dissimilatory nitrite reduction seemed possible; minor quantities of nitrate was present in manure, potentially originating from oxidative processes occurring on the barn floor. The nitrate-transformation linked ASVs were more prevalent at the near-surface locations and all depths of the inlet. Anammox bacteria and archaeal or bacterial autotrophic nitrifiers were not detected in either storage. Hydrogenotrophic Methanocorpusculum species were the primary methanogens or methane producers, exhibiting higher abundance in the earthen pit. These findings suggested that microbial activities were not the main drivers for nitrogen loss from manure storage, and commonly reported losses are associated with the physicochemical processes. Finally, the microbiomes of stored manure had the potential to emit greenhouse gases such as NO, NO, and methane.
储存粪便是奶牛场养分管理的一个重要方面。它为在作物和牧场生产中有效利用粪便作为肥料提供了机会。通常,粪便储存设施建造成土制、混凝土制或钢制结构。然而,储存粪便可能会通过微生物和物理化学过程向大气中排放空气污染物,包括氮和温室气体。我们对商业奶牛场中两种粪便储存结构(一个黏土衬砌的土坑和一个地上混凝土储存罐)中的微生物群落组成进行了表征,以识别氮转化过程,从而为制定减轻措施提供依据,以保留粪便的价值。首先,我们分析了从储存设施的多个位置和深度(地表以下0.3米、1.2米以及2.1 - 2.75米)采集的粪便样本中产生的16S rRNA - V4扩增子,确定了一组扩增子序列变体(ASV)并对其丰度进行了量化。然后,我们推断了各自的代谢能力。这些结果表明,与混凝土罐相比,土坑中粪便微生物群落组成更复杂,且不同位置之间的差异更大。此外,土坑的入口处和有硬表面结壳的位置有独特的群落。两个储存设施中的微生物群落都有产生氨的潜力,但缺乏将其氧化为气态化合物的生物体。然而,通过反硝化作用将硝酸盐微生物转化为气态氮、一氧化氮和二氧化氮,以及通过异化亚硝酸盐还原转化为稳定氨似乎是可能的;粪便中存在少量硝酸盐,可能源自牛舍地面发生的氧化过程。与硝酸盐转化相关的ASV在入口处的近地表位置和所有深度更为普遍。在两个储存设施中均未检测到厌氧氨氧化细菌以及古菌或细菌自养硝化菌。嗜氢甲烷微菌属是主要的产甲烷菌或甲烷生产者,在土坑中的丰度更高。这些发现表明,微生物活动不是粪便储存中氮损失的主要驱动因素,通常报道的损失与物理化学过程有关。最后,储存粪便的微生物群落有排放一氧化氮、二氧化氮和甲烷等温室气体的潜力。