Fransen Frederike, Hiel Marjolein A J, Al-Niaimi Firas, Badawi Ashraf, Haedersdal Merete, Laubach Hans-Joachim, Snauwaert Johan E, Wolkerstorfer Albert
Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.
Mauritskliniek, The Hague, The Netherlands.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 11;13:e63. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.63. eCollection 2022.
Inhalation of laser-induced smoke is a potential health hazard to exposed physicians and laser operators. To date, little is known about the perception of health hazards related to laser-induced smoke exposure among physicians and the actual use of safety measures to mitigate these risks. In May 2020, 514 members of the European Society for Lasers and Energy-Based Devices (ESLD) were invited by email to participate in an online survey. The survey comprised 16 questions including multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Responses were received from 109 participants. The majority (90%) were aware of potential hazards and highlighted a desire for better protective measures (60%). A smoke evacuation system was frequently used with ablative lasers (66%) and fractional ablative lasers (61%), but less the case with non-ablative lasers (30%) and hair removal lasers (28%). The COVID-19 outbreak had no clear effect on the use of smoke evacuation systems. Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, mainly surgical masks were used (40-57%), while high filtration masks (FFP1, FFP2 or FFP3) were used by only a small percentage (15-30%). Post COVID-19 outbreak, the use of high filtration masks increased significantly (54-66%), predominately due to an increase in the use of FFP2 masks. Reasons mentioned for inadequate protective measures were sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, high room temperatures, and financial costs. While there is considerable awareness of the hazards of laser-induced smoke among physicians and laser operators, a substantial number of them do not use appropriate protective measures. The implementation of regulations on safety measures is hampered by sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, financial issues, and high room temperatures.
吸入激光产生的烟雾对接触的医生和激光操作人员存在潜在健康危害。迄今为止,对于医生中与激光烟雾暴露相关的健康危害认知以及减轻这些风险的安全措施实际使用情况知之甚少。2020年5月,欧洲激光与能量设备协会(ESLD)的514名成员通过电子邮件受邀参加一项在线调查。该调查包括16个问题,涵盖多项选择题和开放式问题。共收到109名参与者的回复。大多数人(90%)意识到潜在危害,并强调希望有更好的防护措施(60%)。烟雾抽吸系统在剥脱性激光(66%)和分次剥脱性激光(61%)使用中较为频繁,但在非剥脱性激光(30%)和脱毛激光(28%)使用中较少。新冠疫情爆发对烟雾抽吸系统的使用没有明显影响。在新冠疫情爆发前,主要使用外科口罩(40 - 57%),而使用高过滤口罩(FFP1、FFP2或FFP3)的比例仅占一小部分(15 - 30%)。新冠疫情爆发后,高过滤口罩的使用显著增加(54 - 66%),主要是由于FFP2口罩的使用增加。提及防护措施不足的原因包括知识匮乏、供应有限、不适、噪音过大、室温过高以及经济成本等。虽然医生和激光操作人员对激光烟雾危害有相当的认知,但其中相当一部分人并未采取适当的防护措施。安全措施法规的实施受到知识匮乏、供应有限、不适、噪音过大、经济问题和室温过高的阻碍。