• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice: A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs.皮肤科实践中的激光诱导烟雾:一项关于探索危害认知、安全措施及未满足需求的调查
J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 11;13:e63. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.63. eCollection 2022.
2
Surgical Smoke-Hazard Perceptions and Protective Measures in German Operating Rooms.德国手术室的手术烟雾危害认知和防护措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;17(2):515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020515.
3
Surgical Smoke in Dermatology: Its Hazards and Management.皮肤科手术烟雾:其危害与管理
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2019 Jan-Mar;12(1):1-7. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_177_18.
4
COVID-19: smoke testing of surgical mask and respirators.COVID-19:手术口罩和呼吸器的烟雾测试。
Occup Med (Lond). 2020 Dec 12;70(8):556-563. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa167.
5
[Classification of laser irradiation and safety measures].[激光照射的分类及安全措施]
Med Pregl. 1998 Sep-Oct;51(9-10):415-8.
6
Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists.妇科医生对手术烟雾危害的认识及手术烟雾预防措施的加强
J Cancer. 2019 Jun 2;10(12):2788-2799. doi: 10.7150/jca.31464. eCollection 2019.
7
Surgical smoke and the dermatologist.手术烟雾与皮肤科医生。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Sep;65(3):636-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 May 7.
8
Implementing AORN Recommended Practices for Laser Safety.实施美国手术室注册护士协会(AORN)的激光安全推荐规范。
AORN J. 2012 May;95(5):612-24; quiz 625-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2012.03.001.
9
Surgical smoke evacuation systems.手术烟雾抽吸系统。
Health Devices. 1997 Apr;26(4):132-72.
10
The hazards of surgical smoke.手术烟雾的危害。
AORN J. 2008 Apr;87(4):721-34; quiz 735-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.10.012.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrafine particle concentrations during laser hair removal: Effectiveness of smoke evacuators.激光脱毛过程中的超细颗粒浓度:烟雾清除器的有效性。
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Feb;54(2):217-223. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23465. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
2
Comparison of the Filtration Efficiency of Different Face Masks Against Aerosols.不同口罩对气溶胶过滤效率的比较
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 2;8:654317. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.654317. eCollection 2021.
3
Surgical plume in dermatology: an insidious and often overlooked hazard.皮肤科手术烟雾:一种隐匿且常被忽视的危害。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020 Oct;45(7):841-847. doi: 10.1111/ced.14350. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
FFP3, FFP2, N95, surgical masks and respirators: what should we be wearing for ophthalmic surgery in the COVID-19 pandemic?FFP3、FFP2、N95、医用口罩和呼吸器:在新冠疫情期间的眼科手术中我们应该佩戴什么?
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;258(8):1587-1589. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04751-3. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Safe management of surgical smoke in the age of COVID-19.COVID-19 大流行时期手术烟雾的安全管理。
Br J Surg. 2020 Oct;107(11):1406-1413. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11679. Epub 2020 May 3.
6
COVID-19 coronavirus: recommended personal protective equipment for the orthopaedic and trauma surgeon.COVID-19 冠状病毒:矫形和创伤外科医生推荐的个人防护设备。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jun;28(6):1690-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06022-4. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and dermatologists: Potential biological hazards of laser surgery in epidemic area.2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与皮肤科医生:疫区激光手术的潜在生物危害
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Jul 15;198:110598. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110598. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Surgical Smoke-Hazard Perceptions and Protective Measures in German Operating Rooms.德国手术室的手术烟雾危害认知和防护措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;17(2):515. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020515.
9
Intraoperative electrosurgical smoke during outpatient surgery: a survey of dermatologic surgeon and staff preferences.门诊手术中的术中电外科烟雾:皮肤科医生及工作人员偏好调查
Cutis. 2019 Aug;104(2):120-124.
10
Surgical Smoke Exposure in Operating Room Personnel: A Review.手术室内人员的手术烟雾暴露:综述。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Oct 1;154(10):960-967. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2515.

皮肤科实践中的激光诱导烟雾:一项关于探索危害认知、安全措施及未满足需求的调查

Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice: A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs.

作者信息

Fransen Frederike, Hiel Marjolein A J, Al-Niaimi Firas, Badawi Ashraf, Haedersdal Merete, Laubach Hans-Joachim, Snauwaert Johan E, Wolkerstorfer Albert

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands.

Mauritskliniek, The Hague, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Dec 11;13:e63. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2022.63. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.34172/jlms.2022.63
PMID:37041772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10082903/
Abstract

Inhalation of laser-induced smoke is a potential health hazard to exposed physicians and laser operators. To date, little is known about the perception of health hazards related to laser-induced smoke exposure among physicians and the actual use of safety measures to mitigate these risks. In May 2020, 514 members of the European Society for Lasers and Energy-Based Devices (ESLD) were invited by email to participate in an online survey. The survey comprised 16 questions including multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Responses were received from 109 participants. The majority (90%) were aware of potential hazards and highlighted a desire for better protective measures (60%). A smoke evacuation system was frequently used with ablative lasers (66%) and fractional ablative lasers (61%), but less the case with non-ablative lasers (30%) and hair removal lasers (28%). The COVID-19 outbreak had no clear effect on the use of smoke evacuation systems. Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, mainly surgical masks were used (40-57%), while high filtration masks (FFP1, FFP2 or FFP3) were used by only a small percentage (15-30%). Post COVID-19 outbreak, the use of high filtration masks increased significantly (54-66%), predominately due to an increase in the use of FFP2 masks. Reasons mentioned for inadequate protective measures were sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, high room temperatures, and financial costs. While there is considerable awareness of the hazards of laser-induced smoke among physicians and laser operators, a substantial number of them do not use appropriate protective measures. The implementation of regulations on safety measures is hampered by sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, financial issues, and high room temperatures.

摘要

吸入激光产生的烟雾对接触的医生和激光操作人员存在潜在健康危害。迄今为止,对于医生中与激光烟雾暴露相关的健康危害认知以及减轻这些风险的安全措施实际使用情况知之甚少。2020年5月,欧洲激光与能量设备协会(ESLD)的514名成员通过电子邮件受邀参加一项在线调查。该调查包括16个问题,涵盖多项选择题和开放式问题。共收到109名参与者的回复。大多数人(90%)意识到潜在危害,并强调希望有更好的防护措施(60%)。烟雾抽吸系统在剥脱性激光(66%)和分次剥脱性激光(61%)使用中较为频繁,但在非剥脱性激光(30%)和脱毛激光(28%)使用中较少。新冠疫情爆发对烟雾抽吸系统的使用没有明显影响。在新冠疫情爆发前,主要使用外科口罩(40 - 57%),而使用高过滤口罩(FFP1、FFP2或FFP3)的比例仅占一小部分(15 - 30%)。新冠疫情爆发后,高过滤口罩的使用显著增加(54 - 66%),主要是由于FFP2口罩的使用增加。提及防护措施不足的原因包括知识匮乏、供应有限、不适、噪音过大、室温过高以及经济成本等。虽然医生和激光操作人员对激光烟雾危害有相当的认知,但其中相当一部分人并未采取适当的防护措施。安全措施法规的实施受到知识匮乏、供应有限、不适、噪音过大、经济问题和室温过高的阻碍。