Department of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CETI), Chair of Acoustic and Haptic Engineering, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 12;18(4):e0284407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284407. eCollection 2023.
Our ability to perform voluntary actions and make choices is shaped by the motivation from control over the resulting effects (agency) and from positive outcomes (reward). The underlying action-outcome binding mechanisms rely on sensorimotor abilities that specialise through child development and undergo different trajectories in autism. The study aimed at disentangling the role of agency and reward in driving action selection of autistic and non-autistic children and adults, who were asked to freely select one of three candies and feed the animals appearing on a tablet. The candies were associated with different probabilities of delivering a neutral vs no effect (agency task), or a positive vs neutral effect (reward task). Choices and reaction times (RT) were measured to understand whether participants preferred and were faster at selecting options with higher probability of producing a neutral vs. no effect (agency) or a positive vs. neutral effect (reward). Participants' choices and RT were not affected by agency, whereas a more frequent selection of the option with higher probability of a positive vs. neutral effect emerged across groups, thus suggesting a reward effect. Autistic participants selected less frequently the option with chance level of receiving a neutral or no effect, which could be interpreted as a sign of reduced tolerance of uncertainty. Across tasks, conditions and age groups, autistic participants presented shorter RT, which is a marker of reduced action planning and control. Future research should deepen how tolerance of uncertainty, action planning and control impact the way autistic individuals make choices in everyday life situations, potentially contributing to restricted and repetitive behaviours.
我们执行自愿行动和做出选择的能力受到对产生的结果的控制的动机(自主性)和积极结果(奖励)的影响。潜在的行动-结果绑定机制依赖于通过儿童发展专业化的感觉运动能力,并在自闭症中经历不同的轨迹。本研究旨在厘清自主性和奖励在驱动自闭症和非自闭症儿童和成人的行动选择中的作用,他们被要求从三种糖果中自由选择一种,并喂平板电脑上出现的动物。糖果与产生中性与无效果(自主性任务)或正性与中性效果(奖励任务)的不同概率相关联。选择和反应时间(RT)被测量,以了解参与者是否更喜欢并更快地选择产生中性与无效果(自主性)或正性与中性效果(奖励)的可能性更高的选项。参与者的选择和 RT 不受自主性的影响,而在所有组中,更频繁地选择具有更高正性与中性效果的可能性的选项,这表明存在奖励效应。自闭症参与者不太频繁地选择具有中性或无效果的机会水平的选项,这可能被解释为降低不确定性容忍度的迹象。在所有任务、条件和年龄组中,自闭症参与者的 RT 更短,这是行动规划和控制减少的标志。未来的研究应该深入了解不确定性容忍度、行动规划和控制如何影响自闭症个体在日常生活情境中做出选择的方式,这可能导致受限和重复行为。