Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
J Card Fail. 2023 Jul;29(7):986-996. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.03.018. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
Evidence for modulating the sodium chloride (NaCl) intake of patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) is inconclusive. Salt restriction may not benefit; hypertonic saline may aid diuresis.
To compare the safety and efficacy of oral NaCl during intravenous (IV) diuretic therapy in renal function and weight.
Seventy hospitalized patients with AHF who were being treated with IV furosemide infusion consented to receive, randomly, 2 grams of oral NaCl or placebo 3 times a day in a double-blind manner during diuresis. Treatment efficacy (bivariate primary endpoints of change in serum creatinine levels and change in weight) was measured at 96 hours, and adverse safety events were tracked for 90 days.
Sixty-five patients (34 NaCl, 31 placebo) were included for analysis after 5 withdrew. A median of 13 grams of NaCl was given compared to placebo. At 96 hours, there was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to the primary endpoint (P = 0.33); however, the trial was underpowered, and there was greater than expected standard deviation in weight change. The mean change in creatinine levels and weight was 0.15 ± 0.44 mg/dL and 4.6 ± 4.2 kg in the placebo group compared with 0.04 ± 0.40 mg/dL and 4.0 ± 4.3 kg in the NaCl group (P = 0.30 and 0.57, respectively). Across efficacy and safety endpoints, we observed no significant difference between the 2 groups other than changes in serum sodium levels (-2.6 ± 2.7 in the placebo group and -0.3 ± 3.3 mEq/L in the NaCl group; P < 0.001) and in serum blood urea nitrogen levels (11 ± 15 in the placebo group; 3.1 ± 13 mEq/L in the NaCl group; P = 0.025).
In this single-center study, liberal vs restrictive oral sodium chloride intake strategies did not impact the safety and efficacy of intravenous diuretic therapy in patients with AHF. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04334668.).
目前针对住院急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的氯化钠(NaCl)摄入调节的证据尚无定论。限盐可能无益,高渗盐水可能有助于利尿。
比较口服 NaCl 在静脉(IV)利尿剂治疗期间对肾功能和体重的安全性和疗效。
70 例接受 IV 呋塞米输注治疗的 AHF 住院患者同意接受随机、双盲、每日 3 次口服 2 克 NaCl 或安慰剂治疗,在利尿过程中进行治疗。96 小时时测量治疗效果(血清肌酐水平变化和体重变化的双变量主要终点),并在 90 天内跟踪不良安全事件。
5 例患者退出后,共有 65 例患者(34 例 NaCl,31 例安慰剂)纳入分析。与安慰剂相比,给予中位数为 13 克的 NaCl。96 小时时,两组间主要终点无显著差异(P = 0.33);然而,试验的效能不足,体重变化的标准差大于预期。安慰剂组的肌酐水平和体重的平均变化为 0.15 ± 0.44 mg/dL 和 4.6 ± 4.2 kg,NaCl 组分别为 0.04 ± 0.40 mg/dL 和 4.0 ± 4.3 kg(P = 0.30 和 0.57)。除血清钠水平变化(安慰剂组为-2.6 ± 2.7 mEq/L,NaCl 组为-0.3 ± 3.3 mEq/L;P < 0.001)和血清血尿素氮水平变化(安慰剂组为 11 ± 15 mEq/L;NaCl 组为 3.1 ± 13 mEq/L;P = 0.025)外,两组在疗效和安全性终点方面均无显著差异。
在这项单中心研究中,与限制相比,自由摄入口服氯化钠策略并未影响 AHF 患者静脉内利尿剂治疗的安全性和疗效。(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号 NCT04334668)。