Suppr超能文献

口服钠以维持急性心力衰竭患者的肾功能:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。

Oral Sodium to Preserve Renal Efficiency in Acute Heart Failure: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2023 Jul;29(7):986-996. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.03.018. Epub 2023 Apr 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence for modulating the sodium chloride (NaCl) intake of patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF) is inconclusive. Salt restriction may not benefit; hypertonic saline may aid diuresis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of oral NaCl during intravenous (IV) diuretic therapy in renal function and weight.

METHODS

Seventy hospitalized patients with AHF who were being treated with IV furosemide infusion consented to receive, randomly, 2 grams of oral NaCl or placebo 3 times a day in a double-blind manner during diuresis. Treatment efficacy (bivariate primary endpoints of change in serum creatinine levels and change in weight) was measured at 96 hours, and adverse safety events were tracked for 90 days.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients (34 NaCl, 31 placebo) were included for analysis after 5 withdrew. A median of 13 grams of NaCl was given compared to placebo. At 96 hours, there was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to the primary endpoint (P = 0.33); however, the trial was underpowered, and there was greater than expected standard deviation in weight change. The mean change in creatinine levels and weight was 0.15 ± 0.44 mg/dL and 4.6 ± 4.2 kg in the placebo group compared with 0.04 ± 0.40 mg/dL and 4.0 ± 4.3 kg in the NaCl group (P = 0.30 and 0.57, respectively). Across efficacy and safety endpoints, we observed no significant difference between the 2 groups other than changes in serum sodium levels (-2.6 ± 2.7 in the placebo group and -0.3 ± 3.3 mEq/L in the NaCl group; P < 0.001) and in serum blood urea nitrogen levels (11 ± 15 in the placebo group; 3.1 ± 13 mEq/L in the NaCl group; P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center study, liberal vs restrictive oral sodium chloride intake strategies did not impact the safety and efficacy of intravenous diuretic therapy in patients with AHF. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04334668.).

摘要

背景

目前针对住院急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的氯化钠(NaCl)摄入调节的证据尚无定论。限盐可能无益,高渗盐水可能有助于利尿。

目的

比较口服 NaCl 在静脉(IV)利尿剂治疗期间对肾功能和体重的安全性和疗效。

方法

70 例接受 IV 呋塞米输注治疗的 AHF 住院患者同意接受随机、双盲、每日 3 次口服 2 克 NaCl 或安慰剂治疗,在利尿过程中进行治疗。96 小时时测量治疗效果(血清肌酐水平变化和体重变化的双变量主要终点),并在 90 天内跟踪不良安全事件。

结果

5 例患者退出后,共有 65 例患者(34 例 NaCl,31 例安慰剂)纳入分析。与安慰剂相比,给予中位数为 13 克的 NaCl。96 小时时,两组间主要终点无显著差异(P = 0.33);然而,试验的效能不足,体重变化的标准差大于预期。安慰剂组的肌酐水平和体重的平均变化为 0.15 ± 0.44 mg/dL 和 4.6 ± 4.2 kg,NaCl 组分别为 0.04 ± 0.40 mg/dL 和 4.0 ± 4.3 kg(P = 0.30 和 0.57)。除血清钠水平变化(安慰剂组为-2.6 ± 2.7 mEq/L,NaCl 组为-0.3 ± 3.3 mEq/L;P < 0.001)和血清血尿素氮水平变化(安慰剂组为 11 ± 15 mEq/L;NaCl 组为 3.1 ± 13 mEq/L;P = 0.025)外,两组在疗效和安全性终点方面均无显著差异。

结论

在这项单中心研究中,与限制相比,自由摄入口服氯化钠策略并未影响 AHF 患者静脉内利尿剂治疗的安全性和疗效。(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号 NCT04334668)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验