Karabuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Karabuk - Turquia.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024 Jun;121(7):e20230818. doi: 10.36660/abc.20230818.
There was no scientific evidence about the initial treatment of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF).
This study assessed the impact of using HSS along with a loop diuretic (LD) as the first diuretic treatment for ADHF, focusing on renal function, electrolyte levels, and clinical outcomes.
In this retrospective case-control study, 171 adult patients (93 females/78 males) with ADHF were included between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022. Patients were allocated into two groups: upfront combo HSS+LD and standardized LD. The primary endpoint was worsening renal function (WRF). Hospitalization for HF and all-cause mortality were evaluated during 6 months of follow-up. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%.
The groups exhibited similarities in baseline characteristics.A significantly higher diuresis on the 1st day (3975 [3000-5150] vs. 2583 [2000-3250], p=0.001) and natriuresis on the 2nd hour (116.00 [82.75-126.00] vs. 68.50 [54.00-89.75], p=0.001) in the initial upfront combo HSS+LD were found in comparison with the standardized LD.When compared to the standardized LD, the utilization of HSS led to an increase in serum Na+ (137.00 [131.75-140.00] vs. 140.00 [136.00-142.25], p=0.001 for upfront combo HSS, 139.00 [137.00-141.00] vs. 139.00 [136.00-140.00], p=.0470 for standardized LD), while chloride (99.00 [94.00-103.25] vs. 99.00[96.00-103.00], p=0.295), GFR (48.50 [29.75-72.50 vs. 50.00 [35.50-63.50, p=0.616), and creatinine (1.20 [0.90-1.70] vs. 1.20 [1.00-1.50], p=0.218) remained stable in the upfront combo HSS group when compared to standardized LD group (Cl-: 102.00 [99.00-106.00] vs. 98.00 [95.00-103.00], p=0.001, eGFR: 56.00 [41.00-71.00] vs. 55.00 [35.00-71.00], p=0.050, creatinine:1.10 [0.90-1.40] vs. 1.20 [0.90-1.70], p=0.009). Worsening renal function (16.1% vs 35.5%, p=0.007), and length of stay in the hospital (4 days [3-7] vs. 5 days [4-7], p=0.004) were lower in the upfront combo HSS+LD in comparison with the standardized LD. In-hospital mortality, hospitalization for HF, and all-cause mortality were similar between the two groups.
HSS as an initial therapy, when combined with LD, may provide a safe and effective diuresis without impairing renal function in ADHF. Therefore, HSS may lead to a shorter length of stay in the hospital for these patients.
在急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)中,高渗盐水溶液(HSS)的初始治疗没有科学证据。
本研究评估了在 ADHF 中使用 HSS 联合袢利尿剂(LD)作为一线利尿剂治疗的影响,重点关注肾功能、电解质水平和临床结局。
在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,纳入了 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间的 171 名成人 ADHF 患者(女性 93 名/男性 78 名)。患者被分为两组: upfront combo HSS+LD 和标准化 LD。主要终点是肾功能恶化(WRF)。在 6 个月的随访期间评估了因 HF 住院和全因死亡率。在统计分析中采用的显著性水平为 5%。
两组在基线特征上具有相似性。与标准化 LD 相比, upfront combo HSS+LD 组在第 1 天的尿量(3975[3000-5150]比 2583[2000-3250],p=0.001)和第 2 小时的钠排泄量(116.00[82.75-126.00]比 68.50[54.00-89.75],p=0.001)更高。与标准化 LD 相比,使用 HSS 会导致血清 Na+升高(137.00[131.75-140.00]比 140.00[136.00-142.25],p=0.001 用于 upfront combo HSS,139.00[137.00-141.00]比 139.00[136.00-140.00],p=0.0470 用于标准化 LD),而氯(99.00[94.00-103.25]比 99.00[96.00-103.00],p=0.295)、肾小球滤过率(GFR)(48.50[29.75-72.50]比 50.00[35.50-63.50],p=0.616)和肌酐(1.20[0.90-1.70]比 1.20[1.00-1.50],p=0.218)在 upfront combo HSS 组中保持稳定与标准化 LD 组相比(Cl-:102.00[99.00-106.00]比 98.00[95.00-103.00],p=0.001,eGFR:56.00[41.00-71.00]比 55.00[35.00-71.00],p=0.050,肌酐:1.10[0.90-1.40]比 1.20[0.90-1.70],p=0.009)。与标准化 LD 相比,WRF(16.1%比 35.5%,p=0.007)和住院时间(4 天[3-7]比 5 天[4-7],p=0.004)更低在 upfront combo HSS+LD 中。两组在院内死亡率、因 HF 住院和全因死亡率方面相似。
HSS 作为初始治疗,与 LD 联合使用时,可能在不损害 ADHF 患者肾功能的情况下提供安全有效的利尿作用。因此,HSS 可能会导致这些患者的住院时间缩短。