Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 12;13(1):5967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32711-4.
Given its centrality in scholarly and popular discourse, morality should be expected to figure prominently in everyday talk. We test this expectation by examining the frequency of moral content in three contexts, using three methods: (a) Participants' subjective frequency estimates (N = 581); (b) Human content analysis of unobtrusively recorded in-person interactions (N = 542 participants; n = 50,961 observations); and (c) Computational content analysis of Facebook posts (N = 3822 participants; n = 111,886 observations). In their self-reports, participants estimated that 21.5% of their interactions touched on morality (Study 1), but objectively, only 4.7% of recorded conversational samples (Study 2) and 2.2% of Facebook posts (Study 3) contained moral content. Collectively, these findings suggest that morality may be far less prominent in everyday life than scholarly and popular discourse, and laypeople, presume.
鉴于道德在学术和大众话语中的核心地位,人们应该预期道德会在日常对话中占据重要地位。我们通过在三种情境下,使用三种方法来检验这一预期:(a)参与者的主观频率估计(N=581);(b)对非干扰性记录的面对面互动进行人工内容分析(N=542 名参与者;n=50961 次观察);(c)对 Facebook 帖子进行计算内容分析(N=3822 名参与者;n=111886 次观察)。在他们的自我报告中,参与者估计 21.5%的互动涉及道德(研究 1),但客观上,只有 4.7%的记录对话样本(研究 2)和 2.2%的 Facebook 帖子(研究 3)包含道德内容。总的来说,这些发现表明,道德在日常生活中的突出程度可能远低于学术和大众话语中的假设,也低于一般民众的预期。