• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斯洛文尼亚初级卫生保健团队对 2 型糖尿病和高血压患者整合护理实施情况的看法:定性研究。

Perceptions of the primary health care team about the implementation of integrated care of patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in Slovenia: qualitative study.

机构信息

Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09353-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09353-3
PMID:37046293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10091568/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Integrated care involves good coordination, networking, and communication within health care services and externally between providers and patients or informal caregivers. It affects the quality of services, is more cost-effective, and contributes to greater satisfaction among individuals and providers of integrated care. In our study, we examined the implementation and understanding of integrated care from the perspective of providers - the health care team - and gained insights into the current situation.

METHODS

Eight focus groups were conducted with health care teams, involving a total of 48 health care professionals, including family physicians, registered nurses, practice nurses, community nurses, and registered nurses working in a health education center. Prior to conducting the focus groups, a thematic guide was developed based on the literature and contextual knowledge with the main themes of the integrated care package. The analysis was conducted using the NVivo program.

RESULTS

We identified 12 main themes with 49 subthemes. Health care professionals highlighted good accessibility and the method of diagnostic screening integrated with preventive examinations as positive aspects of the current system of integrated care in Slovenia. They mentioned the good cooperation within the team, with the involvement of registered nurses and community nurses being a particular advantage. Complaints were made about the high workload and the lack of workforce. They feel that patients do not take the disease seriously enough and that patients as teachers could be useful.

CONCLUSION

Primary care teams described the importance of implementing integrated care for diabetes and hypertension patients at four levels: Patient, community, care providers, and state. Primary care teams also recognized the importance of including more professionals from different health care settings on their team.

摘要

背景

整合照顾涉及医疗服务内部以及提供者与患者或非正式照护者之间的良好协调、网络和沟通。它影响服务质量,更具成本效益,并有助于提高整合照顾者和接受者的满意度。在我们的研究中,我们从提供者(医疗保健团队)的角度审视了整合照顾的实施和理解,并深入了解了现状。

方法

我们对医疗保健团队进行了八次焦点小组讨论,共有 48 名医疗保健专业人员参加,包括家庭医生、注册护士、执业护士、社区护士和在健康教育中心工作的注册护士。在进行焦点小组讨论之前,根据文献和背景知识制定了一个主题指南,主题包括整合照顾套餐的主要主题。使用 NVivo 程序进行分析。

结果

我们确定了 12 个主要主题和 49 个子主题。医疗保健专业人员强调了良好的可及性和将诊断筛查与预防性检查相结合的方法,这是斯洛文尼亚当前整合照护系统的积极方面。他们提到了团队内部的良好合作,注册护士和社区护士的参与是一个特别的优势。他们抱怨工作量大,人员不足。他们认为患者对疾病不够重视,患者作为教师可能会有所帮助。

结论

初级保健团队描述了在四个层面实施糖尿病和高血压患者整合照护的重要性:患者、社区、照护提供者和国家。初级保健团队还认识到在团队中纳入来自不同医疗保健环境的更多专业人员的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b6f/10091568/61c89e2dde06/12913_2023_9353_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b6f/10091568/61c89e2dde06/12913_2023_9353_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b6f/10091568/61c89e2dde06/12913_2023_9353_Figa_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of the primary health care team about the implementation of integrated care of patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in Slovenia: qualitative study.斯洛文尼亚初级卫生保健团队对 2 型糖尿病和高血压患者整合护理实施情况的看法:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09353-3.
2
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
The collaboration of general practitioners and nurses in primary care: a comparative analysis of concepts and practices in Slovenia and Spain.初级保健中全科医生与护士的合作:斯洛文尼亚和西班牙概念与实践的比较分析。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Sep;18(5):492-506. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000354. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
10
Partners in care: investigating community nurses' understanding of an interdisciplinary team-based approach to primary care.护理合作伙伴:调查社区护士对基于跨学科团队的初级护理方法的理解。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Nov;17(22):3004-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02068.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a maturity-level model for interprofessional collaboration in elective surgery preparation.制定择期手术准备中跨专业协作的成熟度模型。
Narra J. 2025 Aug;5(2):e2213. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i2.2213. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Evaluation of the Implementation of Integrated Primary Care for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension in Belgium, Cambodia, and Slovenia.比利时、柬埔寨和斯洛文尼亚2型糖尿病和高血压患者综合初级保健实施情况评估
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jun 28;24(2):27. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7664. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
3
Person-Centred Diabetes Care: Examining Patient Empowerment and Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life in Slovenian Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
"We just have to help": Community health workers' informal task-shifting and task-sharing practices for hypertension and diabetes care in Nigeria.“我们只能尽力而为”:尼日利亚社区卫生工作者在高血压和糖尿病护理方面的非正式任务转换和任务分担实践。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;11:1038062. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1038062. eCollection 2023.
2
The impact of funding models on the integration of registered nurses in primary health care teams: protocol for a multi-phase mixed-methods study in Canada.基金模式对注册护士融入初级卫生保健团队的影响:加拿大多阶段混合方法研究方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Nov 19;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01900-x.
3
以患者为中心的糖尿病护理:探究斯洛文尼亚成年2型糖尿病患者的自我赋权及糖尿病特异性生活质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;12(9):899. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090899.
4
Assessing the reliability and validity of the Slovenian version of the Appraisal of Diabetes Scale (ADS-S) in type 2 diabetes patients.评估 2 型糖尿病患者 Appraisal of Diabetes Scale(ADS-S)斯洛文尼亚语版本的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 25;19(3):e0300797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300797. eCollection 2024.
5
Facilitators and Barriers to Scaling-Up Integrated Care for Arterial Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes in Slovenia: Qualitative Study.斯洛文尼亚扩大动脉高血压和2型糖尿病综合护理的促进因素与障碍:定性研究
Zdr Varst. 2024 Mar 1;63(1):38-45. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Building from Patient Experiences to Deliver Patient-Focused Healthcare Systems in Collaboration with Patients: A Call to Action.
从患者体验出发,与患者合作构建以患者为中心的医疗保健系统:行动呼吁。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):848-858. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00432-x. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Barriers to the provision of non-communicable disease care in Zimbabwe: a qualitative study of primary health care nurses.津巴布韦非传染性疾病护理提供的障碍:对初级卫生保健护士的定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Mar 18;21(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00841-1.
5
Slovenia: Health System Review.斯洛文尼亚:国家卫生体系概况。
Health Syst Transit. 2021 Oct;23(1):1-183.
6
[Interprofessional Collaboration in Health Care].[医疗保健中的跨专业协作]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2022 Jan;110(1):3-4. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003808.
7
Why doesn't integrated care work? Using Strong Structuration Theory to explain the limitations of an English case.为什么整合护理不起作用?用强结构理论解释英国案例的局限性。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Jan;44(1):113-129. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13398. Epub 2021 Nov 6.
8
Implementation of Integrated Primary Care for Patients with Diabetes and Hypertension: A Case from Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚的一个案例:为糖尿病和高血压患者实施综合初级保健。
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Sep 28;21(3):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5637. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
9
Scaling-up an Integrated Care for Patients with Non-communicable Diseases: An Analysis of Healthcare Barriers and Facilitators in Slovenia and Belgium.扩大非传染性疾病患者的综合护理:斯洛文尼亚和比利时医疗保健障碍与促进因素分析
Zdr Varst. 2021 Jun 28;60(3):158-166. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0023. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Successful Implementation of Integrated Care in Slovenian Primary Care.斯洛文尼亚初级保健中综合护理的成功实施。
Zdr Varst. 2020 Dec 31;60(1):1-3. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0001. eCollection 2020 Dec.