Hämel Kerstin, Vössing Carina
1Professor of Public Health, Health Services Research in Nursing,School of Public Health,Bielefeld University,Germany.
2Research Associate,Working Group Health Services Research & Nursing Science,School of Public Health,Bielefeld University,Germany.
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Sep;18(5):492-506. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000354. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Aim A comparative analysis of concepts and practices of GP-nurse collaborations in primary health centres in Slovenia and Spain.
Cross-professional collaboration is considered a key element for providing high-quality comprehensive care by combining the expertise of various professions. In many countries, nurses are also being given new and more extensive responsibilities. Implemented concepts of collaborative care need to be analysed within the context of care concepts, organisational structures, and effective collaboration.
Background review of primary care concepts (literature analysis, expert interviews), and evaluation of collaboration in 'best practice' health centres in certain regions of Slovenia and Spain. Qualitative content analysis of expert interviews, presentations, observations, and group discussions with professionals and health centre managers. Findings In Slovenian health centres, the collaboration between GPs and nurses has been strongly shaped by their organisation in separate care units and predominantly case-oriented functions. Conventional power structures between professions hinder effective collaboration. The introduction of a new cross-professional primary care concept has integrated advanced practice nurses into general practice. Conventional hierarchies still exist, but a shared vision of preventive care is gradually strengthening attitudes towards team-oriented care. Formal regulations or incentives for teamwork have yet to be implemented. In Spain, health centres were established along with a team-based care concept that encompasses close physician-nurse collaboration and an autonomous role for nurses in the care process. Nurses collaborate with GPs on more equal terms with conflicts centring on professional disagreements. Team development structures and financial incentives for team achievements have been implemented, encouraging teams to generate their own strategies to improve teamwork.
Clearly defined structures, shared visions of care and team development are important for implementing and maintaining a good collaboration. Central prerequisites are advanced nursing education and greater acceptance of advanced nursing practice.
目的 对斯洛文尼亚和西班牙初级卫生保健中心全科医生与护士合作的概念和实践进行比较分析。
跨专业合作被认为是通过整合各专业的专业知识来提供高质量综合护理的关键要素。在许多国家,护士也被赋予了新的、更广泛的职责。需要在护理概念、组织结构和有效合作的背景下分析实施的合作护理概念。
对初级保健概念进行背景审查(文献分析、专家访谈),并对斯洛文尼亚和西班牙某些地区“最佳实践”卫生中心的合作进行评估。对专家访谈、报告、观察以及与专业人员和卫生中心管理人员的小组讨论进行定性内容分析。结果 在斯洛文尼亚的卫生中心,全科医生和护士之间的合作受到他们在独立护理单元的组织形式以及主要以病例为导向的职能的强烈影响。专业之间传统的权力结构阻碍了有效合作。新的跨专业初级保健概念的引入将高级实践护士纳入了全科医疗。传统等级制度仍然存在,但预防保健的共同愿景正在逐渐强化对团队导向护理的态度。尚未实施正式的团队合作规定或激励措施。在西班牙,卫生中心是与基于团队的护理概念一起建立的,该概念包括医生与护士的密切合作以及护士在护理过程中的自主角色。护士与全科医生在更平等的基础上合作,冲突主要集中在专业分歧上。已经实施了团队发展结构和团队成就的财务激励措施,鼓励团队制定自己的策略来改善团队合作。
明确界定的结构、共同的护理愿景和团队发展对于实施和维持良好的合作很重要。核心前提是高级护理教育和对高级护理实践的更大接受度。