• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业补贴是否有效增加了粮食产量?来自中国主要粮食产区的证据。

Do Farm Subsidies Effectively Increase Grain Production? Evidence from Major Grain-Producing Regions of China.

作者信息

Yang Tingwei, Chandio Abbas Ali, Zhang Aopeng, Liu Yan

机构信息

College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.

出版信息

Foods. 2023 Mar 28;12(7):1435. doi: 10.3390/foods12071435.

DOI:10.3390/foods12071435
PMID:37048255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10093900/
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of agricultural subsidies on grain production in major grain-producing regions. We use an empirical model and data from fixed observation points in rural areas collected by the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs in 2016-2017. Our findings show that agricultural subsidies in major grain-producing regions have significantly increased rural household grain yield. Furthermore, findings show that agricultural subsidies and the cost of fertilizer and pesticides for rural households have a mediating effect on grain production. In addition, the effect of agricultural subsidies varies by type: income subsidies have a greater promotion effect on grain production, whereas subsidies for purchasing agricultural machinery have no significant promotion effect on grain production. These findings show that agricultural subsidies promote grain production in China's major grain-producing regions, and have a mediating effect on different types of subsidies.

摘要

本文旨在研究农业补贴对主要粮食产区粮食生产的影响。我们使用了一个实证模型以及农业农村部在2016 - 2017年收集的农村固定观察点数据。我们的研究结果表明,主要粮食产区的农业补贴显著提高了农村家庭的粮食产量。此外,研究结果表明,农业补贴以及农村家庭的化肥和农药成本对粮食生产具有中介作用。此外,农业补贴的效果因类型而异:收入补贴对粮食生产的促进作用更大,而购买农业机械补贴对粮食生产没有显著的促进作用。这些研究结果表明,农业补贴促进了中国主要粮食产区的粮食生产,并对不同类型的补贴具有中介作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d634/10093900/011d8f6e4656/foods-12-01435-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d634/10093900/cb7016747ed4/foods-12-01435-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d634/10093900/011d8f6e4656/foods-12-01435-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d634/10093900/cb7016747ed4/foods-12-01435-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d634/10093900/011d8f6e4656/foods-12-01435-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Do Farm Subsidies Effectively Increase Grain Production? Evidence from Major Grain-Producing Regions of China.农业补贴是否有效增加了粮食产量?来自中国主要粮食产区的证据。
Foods. 2023 Mar 28;12(7):1435. doi: 10.3390/foods12071435.
2
Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer.农业补贴对化肥使用的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
3
The Effectiveness Assessment of Agricultural Subsidy Policies on Food Security: Evidence from China's Poverty-Stricken Villages.农业补贴政策对食品安全的有效性评估:来自中国贫困村庄的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21):13797. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113797.
4
Money for operator: the impact of linked agricultural subsidy on incomes.给经营者的资金:关联农业补贴对收入的影响
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 12;14(1):13554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64100-w.
5
On the impacts of agricultural subsidies on agricultural carbon emissions in China: empirical evidence from microdata of rice production.中国农业补贴对农业碳排放的影响研究——基于水稻生产微观数据的实证
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep;30(45):101151-101167. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29096-2. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
6
The effect of agricultural subsidies on chemical fertilizer use: Evidence from a new policy in China.农业补贴对化肥使用的影响:来自中国一项新政策的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118423. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118423. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
7
Resilience of agricultural development in China's major grain-producing areas under the double security goals of "grain ecology".“粮食生态”双重安全目标下中国主要粮食产区农业发展的韧性
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jan;31(4):5881-5895. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31316-8. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
8
Food security and overuse of agrochemicals: evidence from China's major grain-producing areas policy.粮食安全与农药过度使用:来自中国主要粮食产区政策的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(23):64443-64459. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26620-2. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
9
Accumulation of production capital and income growth of Chinese farmers in the post-poverty alleviation era: A study based on a two-way fixed effects model with CFPS data.后脱贫时代中国农民生产资本积累与收入增长:基于 CFPS 数据的双向固定效应模型研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0309723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309723. eCollection 2024.
10
Assessment of the Effect of the Main Grain-Producing Areas Policy on China's Food Security.主要粮食产区政策对中国粮食安全的影响评估
Foods. 2024 Feb 21;13(5):654. doi: 10.3390/foods13050654.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of agricultural production diversity on farmer household dietary diversity: a case study of Nanjing City.农业生产多样性对农户饮食多样性的影响:以南京市为例
Front Nutr. 2025 Apr 30;12:1493371. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1493371. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of Rural Ageing on Non-Grain Agricultural Production in China: An Analysis Based on Food Security Strategy.中国农村老龄化对非粮食农业生产的影响:基于粮食安全战略的分析
Foods. 2025 Mar 30;14(7):1214. doi: 10.3390/foods14071214.
3
Centralization or Equalization? Policy Trend Guidance for Improving Grain Production Security in China.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effectiveness Assessment of Agricultural Subsidy Policies on Food Security: Evidence from China's Poverty-Stricken Villages.农业补贴政策对食品安全的有效性评估:来自中国贫困村庄的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;19(21):13797. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113797.
2
Food Consumption Structure and Food Security-Through Mediating Effect Analysis of Agricultural R&D and Agricultural Investment.食物消费结构与粮食安全——基于农业研发和农业投资中介效应的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912524.
3
Addressing the effect of meteorological factors and agricultural subsidy on agricultural productivity in India: a roadmap toward environmental sustainability.
集中化还是均衡化?中国提高粮食生产安全的政策趋势导向
Foods. 2025 Mar 12;14(6):966. doi: 10.3390/foods14060966.
4
The Effectiveness and Mechanisms of China's Grain Support Policies in Relation to Grain Yield-An Evaluation of a Wide Range of Policies.中国粮食支持政策对粮食产量的有效性及作用机制——多政策评估
Foods. 2025 Jan 15;14(2):267. doi: 10.3390/foods14020267.
5
Coupling coordination analysis of population, economy and grain in major grain-producing counties.粮食主产县人口、经济与粮食耦合协调分析
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 18;10(1):e23869. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23869. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
解决气象因素和农业补贴对印度农业生产力的影响:迈向环境可持续性的路线图。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):15881-15898. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23210-6. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Options for reforming agricultural subsidies from health, climate, and economic perspectives.从健康、气候和经济角度改革农业补贴的选择。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 10;13(1):82. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27645-2.
5
Effect of agricultural subsidies on the use of chemical fertilizer.农业补贴对化肥使用的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113621. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
Research on grain production efficiency in China's main grain producing areas from the perspective of financial support.中国主要粮食产区粮食生产效率的金融支持研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0247610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247610. eCollection 2021.
7
A computer system supporting agricultural machinery and farm tractor purchase decisions.一个支持农业机械和农用拖拉机购买决策的计算机系统。
Heliyon. 2020 Oct 3;6(10):e05039. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05039. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
Conceptualising COVID-19's impacts on household food security.新冠疫情对家庭粮食安全影响的概念化
Food Secur. 2020;12(4):769-772. doi: 10.1007/s12571-020-01085-0. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
9
Rising concerns over agricultural production as COVID-19 spreads: Lessons from China.随着新冠疫情蔓延,对农业生产的担忧与日俱增:来自中国的经验教训。
Glob Food Sec. 2020 Sep;26:100409. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100409. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
10
An introduction to economic studies, health emergencies, and COVID-19.经济研究、卫生应急和 COVID-19 简介。
J Evid Based Med. 2020 May;13(2):161-167. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12395.