Tapking Christian, Rontoyanni Victoria G, Diehm Yannick F, Strübing Felix, Solimani Farzan, Bigdeli Amir K, Hundeshagen Gabriel, Fischer Sebastian, Kneser Ulrich, Siegwart Laura C
Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 31;12(7):2633. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072633.
The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017-October 2022) were included in this study and grouped in the younger (18-65 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) groups. Primary outcome was a necessity of surgery subsequent to ED. Both groups (patient characteristics, surgical and non-surgical treatment) were compared. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to identify the effect of age on the outcomes. A total of 169 patients were included (younger group: 135 patients, geriatric group: 34 patients). The burn size as indicated by %TBSA (24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%, = 0.499) was similar in both groups. The ASA (2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, < 0.001) and ABSI scores (6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3, < 0.001) were significantly higher in the geriatric group. The %TBSA treated with ED (5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%, = 0.245) were similar in both groups. The necessity of additional surgical interventions (63.0 % vs. 58.8 %, = 0.763) and the wound size debrided and grafted (2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%; = 0.301) were similar in both groups. Regression models yielded that age did not have an effect on efficacy of ED. We showed that ED is reliable and safe to use in geriatric patients. Age did not have a significant influence on the surgical outcomes of ED. In both groups, the size of the grafted area was reduced and, in many patients, surgery was avoided completely.
老年烧伤患者的治疗是烧伤护理中的一项重大挑战。本研究的目的是评估酶促清创术(ED)在老年烧伤患者中的疗效。本研究纳入了2017年8月至2022年10月期间接受ED治疗混合模式和全层烧伤的成年患者,并分为年轻组(18 - 65岁)和老年组(≥65岁)。主要结局是ED后手术的必要性。比较了两组(患者特征、手术和非手术治疗)。使用多元逻辑回归和线性回归模型来确定年龄对结局的影响。共纳入169例患者(年轻组:135例患者,老年组:34例患者)。两组的烧伤面积(以%TBSA表示,分别为24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%,P = 0.499)相似。老年组的ASA评分(2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1,P < 0.001)和ABSI评分(6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3,P < 0.001)显著更高。两组接受ED治疗的%TBSA(5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%,P = 0.245)相似。两组额外手术干预的必要性(63.0% vs. 58.8%,P = 0.763)以及清创和植皮的伤口大小(2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%;P = 0.301)相似。回归模型显示年龄对ED的疗效没有影响。我们表明ED在老年患者中使用是可靠且安全的。年龄对ED的手术结局没有显著影响。在两组中,植皮面积均减小,并且在许多患者中完全避免了手术。