Zaheer Haniah A, Odden Jamie, Gagrani Meghal, Zaguia Fatma, Lowder Careen, Coca Andreea, Rosenkranz Margalit E, Patil-Chhablani Preeti, Ores Raphaelle, Boussion Francois, Indermill Chad, Sahel José-Alain, Nischal Ken, Goldstein Debra A, Errera Marie-Helene
Department of Ophthalmology, Children Hospital Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Associated Retina Consultants, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Mar 27;11:885230. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.885230. eCollection 2023.
Relentless placoid chorioretinitis (RPC) is a rare, bilateral disease of the retinal pigment epithelium. The clinical course is prolonged and relapsing. No standard treatment has been established to date. The purpose of this case series is to report four cases of RPC in pediatric and young adult patients in which varying treatments were used, comparing them to previously published cases.
A literature review was conducted to investigate currently published presentations and treatment options for RPC. A multicenter retrospective chart review was also performed on four consecutive patients. These patients were diagnosed with RPC because of new chorioretinitis lesions continuing to appear without or despite therapy for 5-36 months (2 patients), with a clinical course prolonged and relapsing, or because of the atypical location of the multiple lesions (>50) extending from the posterior pole to the equator and mid-peripheral retina (all four patients), which were not consistent with other entities like acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy and serpiginous choroiditis.
All four cases of RPC received oral or IV steroids acutely, and three of these patients were transitioned to a steroid-sparing agent and biologic therapy: anti-TNF alpha or anti-IL-6. Quiescence of the chorioretinitis lesions was obtained after 7 months, 1 month, and 36 months; however, the latter had issues with treatment adherence. Mycophenolate mofetil was insufficient to control the disease in one patient, but tocilizumab and infliximab thereafter were effective after cessation of adalimumab due to side effects. Adalimumab when started the first month after the presentation was effective in controlling the disease in one patient. After the failure of interferon-alpha-2a, one patient displayed long-term control with infliximab. One patient did not require a steroid-sparing agent after oral prednisone taper as there was no evidence of progression or recurrence.
This case series adds to the current knowledge regarding potential treatments for RPC, specifically the use of anti-TNF-alpha treatment and anti-IL-6 tocilizumab. In this case study, relapses of RPC were found among patients on mycophenolate mofetil and interferon-alpha-2a, and one case did not relapse on oral steroids without a steroid-sparing agent. Our findings suggest that adalimumab, infliximab, and tocilizumab may be useful medications to obtain quiescence of RPC.
顽固性扁平状脉络膜视网膜炎(RPC)是一种罕见的视网膜色素上皮双侧疾病。临床病程迁延且易复发。迄今为止尚未确立标准治疗方法。本病例系列的目的是报告4例儿科和年轻成年RPC患者,他们接受了不同的治疗,并与既往发表的病例进行比较。
进行文献综述以研究目前已发表的RPC临床表现和治疗选择。还对4例连续患者进行了多中心回顾性病历审查。这些患者被诊断为RPC,原因是新的脉络膜视网膜炎病变在未治疗或尽管治疗5至36个月(2例患者)的情况下仍持续出现,临床病程迁延且易复发,或者是因为多个病变(>50个)的非典型位置从后极延伸至赤道和中周边视网膜(所有4例患者),这些情况与急性后极部多发性扁平状色素上皮病变和匐行性脉络膜炎等其他疾病不符。
所有4例RPC患者均急性接受口服或静脉注射类固醇治疗,其中3例患者转而接受类固醇替代药物和生物治疗:抗TNF-α或抗IL-6治疗。脉络膜视网膜炎病变分别在7个月、1个月和36个月后静止;然而,后者存在治疗依从性问题。霉酚酸酯对1例患者控制疾病无效,但在因副作用停用阿达木单抗后,托珠单抗和英夫利昔单抗随后有效。1例患者在出现后第1个月开始使用阿达木单抗,有效控制了疾病。在α-2a干扰素治疗失败后,1例患者使用英夫利昔单抗获得长期病情控制。1例患者在口服泼尼松逐渐减量后不需要类固醇替代药物,因为没有进展或复发的证据。
本病例系列增加了目前关于RPC潜在治疗方法的知识,特别是抗TNF-α治疗和抗IL-6托珠单抗的应用。在本病例研究中,发现使用霉酚酸酯和α-2a干扰素的患者出现RPC复发,1例患者在未使用类固醇替代药物的情况下口服类固醇未复发。我们的研究结果表明,阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和托珠单抗可能是使RPC静止的有用药物。