Mortenson Center in Global Engineering and Resilience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0283019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283019. eCollection 2023.
We present a study design and baseline results to establish the impact of interventions on peri-urban water access, security and quality in Kasai Oriental province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In standard development practice, program performance is tracked via monitoring and evaluation frameworks of varying sophistication and rigor. Monitoring and evaluation, while usually occurring nearly concurrently with program delivery, may or may not measure parameters that can identify performance with respect to the project's overall goals. Impact evaluations, often using tightly controlled trial designs and conducted over years, challenge iterative program evolution. This study will pilot an implementation science impact evaluation approach in the areas immediately surrounding 14 water service providers, at each surveying 100 randomly-selected households and conducting water quality assessments at 25 randomly-selected households and five water points every three months. We present preliminary point-of-collection and point-of-use baseline data. This study is utilizing a variety of short- and medium-term monitoring and impact evaluation methods to provide feedback at multiple points during the intervention. Rapid feedback monitoring will assess the continuity of water services, point-of-consumption and point-of-collection microbial water quality, household water security, household measures of health status, ability and willingness to pay for water and sanitation service provision, and service performance monitoring. Long-term evaluation will focus on the use of qualitative comparative analysis whereby we will investigate the combination of factors that lead to improved water access, security and quality.
我们提出了一项研究设计和基线结果,旨在确定干预措施对刚果民主共和国东方省郊区供水、供水安全和水质的影响。在标准的开发实践中,项目绩效通过不同复杂程度和严格程度的监测和评估框架来跟踪。监测和评估虽然通常与项目交付同时进行,但可能会也可能不会衡量可以确定项目总体目标绩效的参数。影响评估通常使用严格控制的试验设计,并在多年内进行,这对迭代项目演进提出了挑战。本研究将在 14 个供水服务提供商的周边地区试行实施科学影响评估方法,在每次调查中对 100 户随机选择的家庭进行调查,并每三个月在 25 户随机选择的家庭和五个供水点进行水质评估。我们提出了初步的收集点和使用点基线数据。本研究利用各种短期和中期监测和影响评估方法,在干预过程中的多个时间点提供反馈。快速反馈监测将评估供水服务的连续性、消费点和收集点的微生物水质、家庭用水安全、家庭健康状况衡量指标、支付水和环境卫生服务的能力和意愿,以及服务绩效监测。长期评估将侧重于使用定性比较分析,我们将调查导致供水、供水安全和水质改善的因素组合。