Pelch Katherine E, McKnight Taryn, Reade Anna
Natural Resources Defense Council, 111 Sutter St. Floor 20, San Francisco, CA 94104, USA.
Eurofins Environment Testing, 880 Riverside Parkway, West Sacramento, CA 95605, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 10;876:162978. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162978. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
In this community-led pilot study we sought to investigate the utility of expanded per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) testing for drinking water, using a targeted analysis for 70 PFAS and the Total Oxidizable Precursor (TOP) Assay which can indicate the presence of precursor PFAS. PFAS were detected in 30 out of 44 drinking water samples across 16 states; 15 samples would exceed US EPA's proposed maximum contaminant levels for six PFAS. Twenty-six unique PFAS were identified, including 12 not covered by either US EPA Methods 537.1 or 533. An ultrashort chain PFAS, PFPrA, had the highest frequency of detection, occurring in 24 of 30 samples. It was also the PFAS reported at the highest concentration in 15 of these samples. We created a data filter to model how these samples would be reported under the upcoming fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR5) requirements. All of the 30 samples with PFAS quantified by the 70 PFAS test had one or more PFAS present that would not be captured if the UCMR5 reporting requirements were followed. Our analysis suggests the upcoming UCMR5 will likely underreport PFAS in drinking water, due to limited coverage and higher minimum reporting limits. Results were inconclusive on the utility of the TOP Assay for monitoring drinking water. The results from this study provide important information to community participants regarding their current PFAS drinking water exposure. In addition, these results suggest gaps that need to be addressed by regulatory and scientific communities, in particular, the need for expanded targeted analysis of PFAS, the development of a sensitive, broad spectrum PFAS test, and further investigation into ultrashort chain PFAS.
在这项由社区主导的试点研究中,我们试图通过对70种全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)进行靶向分析以及采用可指示前体PFAS存在的总可氧化前体(TOP)测定法,来研究扩大饮用水中PFAS检测的效用。在来自16个州的44个饮用水样本中,有30个检测到了PFAS;15个样本中的六种PFAS将超过美国环境保护局(US EPA)提议的最大污染物水平。鉴定出了26种独特的PFAS,其中包括12种既未被US EPA方法537.1也未被方法533涵盖的物质。一种超短链PFAS,即全氟丙醇(PFPrA),检测频率最高,在30个样本中的24个中出现。它也是这15个样本中报告浓度最高的PFAS。我们创建了一个数据过滤器,以模拟这些样本在即将出台的第五版《未受监管污染物监测规则》(UCMR5)要求下将如何报告。通过70种PFAS测试定量检测出PFAS的所有30个样本中,如果遵循UCMR5报告要求,则会有一种或多种PFAS未被涵盖在内。我们的分析表明,由于覆盖范围有限和最低报告限值较高,即将出台的UCMR5可能会少报饮用水中的PFAS。关于TOP测定法用于监测饮用水的效用,结果尚无定论。这项研究的结果为社区参与者提供了有关他们当前PFAS饮用水暴露情况的重要信息。此外,这些结果表明了监管机构和科学界需要解决的差距,特别是需要扩大PFAS的靶向分析范围、开发一种灵敏的广谱PFAS测试方法,以及对超短链PFAS进行进一步研究。