Mueller Rosie, Salvatore Derrick, Brown Phil, Cordner Alissa
Department of Economics, Whitman College, Walla Walla, Washington, USA.
PFAS Project Lab, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Apr;132(4):47011. doi: 10.1289/EHP12787. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
Policymakers have become increasingly concerned regarding the widespread exposure and toxicity of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). While concerns exist about unequal distribution of PFAS contamination in drinking water, research is lacking.
We assess the scope of PFAS contamination in drinking water in New Jersey (NJ), the first US state to develop regulatory levels for PFAS in drinking water. We test for inequities in PFAS concentrations by community sociodemographic characteristics.
We use PFAS testing data for community water systems (CWS) () from the NJ Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) from 2019 to 2021 and demographic data at the block group level from the US Census to estimate the demographics of the NJ population served by CWS. We use difference in means tests to determine whether CWSs serving "overburdened communities" (OBCs) have a statistically significant difference in likelihood of PFAS detections. OBCs are defined by the NJDEP to be census block groups in which: ) at least 35% of the households qualify as low-income, ) at least 40% of the residents identify as people of color, or ) at least 40% of the households have limited English proficiency. We calculate statewide summary statistics to approximate the relative proportions of sociodemographic groups that are served by CWSs with PFAS detections.
We find that 63% of all CWSs tested by NJDEP from 2019 to 2021 had PFAS detections in public drinking water, collectively serving 84% of NJ's population receiving water from CWSs. Additionally, CWSs serving OBCs had a statistically significant higher likelihood of PFAS detection and a higher likelihood of exposure above state MCLs. We also find that a larger proportion of people of color lived in CWS service areas with PFAS detections compared to the non-Hispanic white population.
These findings quantitatively identify disparities in PFAS contamination of drinking water by CWS service area and highlight the extent of PFAS drinking water contamination and the importance of PFAS remediation efforts for protecting environmental health and justice. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12787.
政策制定者越来越关注全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的广泛暴露及毒性。尽管人们担心饮用水中PFAS污染分布不均,但相关研究仍很缺乏。
我们评估了美国首个制定饮用水中PFAS监管水平的新泽西州(NJ)饮用水中PFAS污染的范围。我们根据社区社会人口特征测试PFAS浓度的不平等情况。
我们使用了新泽西州环境保护部(NJDEP)2019年至2021年社区供水系统(CWS)的PFAS检测数据以及美国人口普查街区组层面的人口统计数据,以估算由CWS供水的新泽西州人口的人口统计信息。我们使用均值差异检验来确定为“负担过重社区”(OBC)供水的CWS在PFAS检测可能性上是否存在统计学上的显著差异。NJDEP将OBC定义为符合以下条件的人口普查街区组:(1)至少35%的家庭被认定为低收入家庭;(2)至少40%的居民为有色人种;或(3)至少40%的家庭英语水平有限。我们计算全州的汇总统计数据,以估算由检测出PFAS的CWS供水的社会人口群体的相对比例。
我们发现,2019年至2021年由NJDEP检测的所有CWS中,63%的公共饮用水中检测出了PFAS,这些CWS总共为84%从CWS取水的新泽西州人口供水。此外,为OBC供水的CWS在PFAS检测方面具有统计学上显著更高的可能性,以及高于该州最大污染物水平(MCL)的暴露可能性。我们还发现,与非西班牙裔白人人口相比,有色人种中有更大比例的人居住在检测出PFAS的CWS服务区。
这些发现定量地确定了CWS服务区饮用水中PFAS污染的差异,并突出了PFAS饮用水污染的程度以及PFAS修复工作对保护环境健康和公正的重要性。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12787 。