• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过 XGBoost 学习方法预测颈椎脊髓损伤患者的神经恢复情况。

Prediction of patient's neurological recovery from cervical spinal cord injury through XGBoost learning approach.

机构信息

Department of ECE, Vardhaman College of Engineering, Hyderabad, India.

Department of CSE, Prasad V Potluri Siddhartha Institute of Technology, Vijayawada, India.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):2140-2148. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07712-6. Epub 2023 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-07712-6
PMID:37060466
Abstract

Due to the diversity of patient characteristics, therapeutic approaches, and radiological findings, it can be challenging to predict outcomes based on neurological consequences accurately within cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) entities and based on machine learning (ML) technique. Accurate neurological outcomes prediction in the patients suffering with cervical spinal cord injury is challenging due to heterogeneity existing in patient characteristics and treatment strategies. Machine learning algorithms are proven technology for achieving greater prediction outcomes. Thus, the research employed machine learning model through extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) for attaining superior accuracy and reliability followed with other MI algorithms for predicting the neurological outcomes. Besides, it generated a model of a data-driven approach with extreme gradient boosting to enhance fault detection techniques (XGBoost) efficiency rate. To forecast improvements within functionalities of neurological systems, the status has been monitored through motor position (ASIA [American Spinal Injury Association] Impairment Scale [AIS] D and E) followed by the method of prediction employing XGBoost, combined with decision tree for regression logistics. Thus, with the proposed XGBoost approach, the enhanced accuracy in reaching the outcome is 81.1%, and from other models such as decision tree (80%) and logistic regression (82%), in predicting outcomes of neurological improvements within cervical SCI patients. Considering the AUC, the XGBoost and decision tree valued with 0.867 and 0.787, whereas logistic regression showed 0.877. Therefore, the application of XGBoost for accurate prediction and decision-making in the categorization of pre-treatment in patients with cervical SCI has reached better development with this study.

摘要

由于患者特征、治疗方法和影像学表现的多样性,基于机器学习(ML)技术,准确预测颈椎脊髓损伤(SCI)实体和基于神经后果的结果具有挑战性。由于患者特征和治疗策略存在异质性,准确预测颈椎脊髓损伤患者的神经预后具有挑战性。机器学习算法是实现更高预测结果的成熟技术。因此,该研究通过极端梯度提升(XGBoost)采用机器学习模型,以获得更高的准确性和可靠性,然后再采用其他 MI 算法来预测神经预后。此外,它生成了一个具有极端梯度提升的数据驱动方法模型,以提高故障检测技术(XGBoost)的效率。为了预测神经功能系统的改善,通过运动位置(美国脊髓损伤协会 [ASIA] 损伤量表 [AIS] D 和 E)监测状态,然后使用 XGBoost 结合决策树进行回归逻辑预测方法。因此,通过提出的 XGBoost 方法,达到结果的增强准确性为 81.1%,而其他模型,如决策树(80%)和逻辑回归(82%),在预测颈椎 SCI 患者神经改善的结果方面。考虑到 AUC,XGBoost 和决策树的值分别为 0.867 和 0.787,而逻辑回归显示为 0.877。因此,XGBoost 在准确预测和决策分类中的应用在患者的颈椎 SCI 患者的治疗前分类中取得了更好的发展。

相似文献

1
Prediction of patient's neurological recovery from cervical spinal cord injury through XGBoost learning approach.通过 XGBoost 学习方法预测颈椎脊髓损伤患者的神经恢复情况。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):2140-2148. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07712-6. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
2
XGBoost, a Machine Learning Method, Predicts Neurological Recovery in Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.机器学习方法XGBoost可预测颈脊髓损伤患者的神经功能恢复情况。
Neurotrauma Rep. 2020 Jul 23;1(1):8-16. doi: 10.1089/neur.2020.0009. eCollection 2020.
3
Efficacy of a machine learning-based approach in predicting neurological prognosis of cervical spinal cord injury patients following urgent surgery within 24 h after injury.基于机器学习的方法在预测颈椎脊髓损伤患者伤后 24 小时内紧急手术后神经预后中的疗效。
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Jan;107:150-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
4
Determining the short-term neurological prognosis for acute cervical spinal cord injury using machine learning.利用机器学习技术预测急性颈脊髓损伤的短期神经预后。
J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Feb;96:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.037. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
5
A functional outcome prediction model of acute traumatic spinal cord injury based on extreme gradient boost.基于极端梯度提升的急性创伤性脊髓损伤功能预后预测模型。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Oct 12;17(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03343-7.
6
Precision medicine for traumatic cervical spinal cord injuries: accessible and interpretable machine learning models to predict individualized in-hospital outcomes.创伤性颈脊髓损伤的精准医学:可及且可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测个体化的院内结局。
Spine J. 2023 Dec;23(12):1750-1763. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Sequential neurological improvements after conservative treatment in patients with complete motor paralysis caused by cervical spinal cord injury without bone and disc injury.无骨与椎间盘损伤的颈脊髓损伤所致完全性运动麻痹患者保守治疗后的序贯性神经功能改善
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jul;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17844. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
8
Predicting Injury Severity and Neurological Recovery after Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Comparison of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers.预测急性颈脊髓损伤后的损伤严重程度和神经恢复:脑脊液和磁共振成像生物标志物的比较。
J Neurotrauma. 2018 Feb 1;35(3):435-445. doi: 10.1089/neu.2017.5357. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Derivation and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Upper Limb Functional Outcomes After Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.创伤性颈脊髓损伤后上肢功能结局的临床预测规则的推导和验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2247949. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47949.
10
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for tracheostomy in acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury patients.急性创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者气管切开术风险预测模型的开发与验证
Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):975-84. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3731-y. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of a novel nested ensemble algorithm in predicting motor function recovery in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.新型嵌套集成算法在预测创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者运动功能恢复中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 29;14(1):17403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65755-1.
2
Assessing the risk of concurrent mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children with tracheobronchial tuberculosis: retrospective study.评估儿童气管支气管结核并发肺炎支原体肺炎的风险:回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Mar 26;12:e17164. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17164. eCollection 2024.
3
Management of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Bone Injury in Adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Logistic regression was as good as machine learning for predicting major chronic diseases.逻辑回归在预测主要慢性病方面与机器学习一样出色。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:56-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
2
Machine Learning to Predict In-Hospital Morbidity and Mortality after Traumatic Brain Injury.机器学习预测创伤性脑损伤后的住院期间发病率和死亡率。
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):202-210. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6276. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
An interpretable boosting model to predict side effects of analgesics for osteoarthritis.
成人无严重骨损伤的颈脊髓损伤的管理
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 27;12(21):6795. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216795.
4
Leveraging artificial intelligence to identify high-risk patients for postoperative sore throat: An observational study.利用人工智能识别术后咽喉痛高危患者:一项观察性研究。
Biomol Biomed. 2024 May 2;24(3):593-605. doi: 10.17305/bb.2023.9519.
5
Advancing polytrauma care: developing and validating machine learning models for early mortality prediction.推进多发伤救治:开发和验证用于早期死亡率预测的机器学习模型。
J Transl Med. 2023 Sep 25;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04487-8.
一种用于预测骨关节炎镇痛药副作用的可解释增强模型。
BMC Syst Biol. 2018 Nov 22;12(Suppl 6):105. doi: 10.1186/s12918-018-0624-4.
4
Longitudinal Prediction of Quality-of-Life Scores and Locomotion in Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.创伤性脊髓损伤患者生活质量评分和运动能力的纵向预测
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;98(12):2385-2392. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
5
Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Failure Readmissions.心力衰竭再入院的机器学习技术分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):629-640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003039. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Is Urgent Decompression Superior to Delayed Surgery for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury? A Meta-Analysis.对于创伤性脊髓损伤,紧急减压是否优于延迟手术?一项荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.098. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
7
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
8
The Brain and Spinal Injury Center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings.脑与脊髓损伤中心评分:一种基于轴向T2加权磁共振成像结果评估急性颈脊髓损伤严重程度的新颖、简单且可重复的方法。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Oct;23(4):495-504. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.SPINE141033. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
9
Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Is Superior if Surgical Decompression and Instrumented Fusion Are Performed within 8 Hours versus 8 to 24 Hours after Injury: A Single Center Experience.创伤性颈脊髓损伤后,若在伤后8小时内而非8至24小时内进行手术减压和器械融合,则神经功能恢复更佳:单中心经验。
J Neurotrauma. 2015 Sep 15;32(18):1385-92. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3767. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
10
Acute diagnostic biomarkers for spinal cord injury: review of the literature and preliminary research report.脊髓损伤的急性诊断生物标志物:文献综述与初步研究报告
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):867-78. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Mar 19.