• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从业者同伴支持开放式对话态度与能力量表的编制:一项德尔菲研究

Development of the peer-supported open dialogue attitude and competence inventory for practitioners: A Delphi study.

作者信息

Fedosejevs Vladimirs, Shi Jinyu, Hopfenbeck Mark Steven

机构信息

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Essex Community Sentence Treatment Requirements Service, St Andrew's Healthcare - Community Partnerships, Essex, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1059103. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059103. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059103
PMID:37063576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10097924/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peer-supported Open Dialogue (POD) is a novel approach to mental health care that is currently being practiced and researched in the United Kingdom. For POD to be successfully implemented, effective training must be provided to make sure trainees are prepared to deliver the approach as intended. Therefore, a specific instrument that can assess the development and competence of POD trainees, as well as the effectiveness of POD training is crucial. Therefore, the current study aimed to establish an inventory named the (PODACI), measuring the changes in attributes and attitudes of trainees before and after training.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To generate the inventory, a four-round modified Delphi approach was used. We first identified the dimensions that are essential and specific to POD through an extensive literature review and individual interviews with practitioners ( = 8). After generating the items, we further refined the items through two rounds of questionnaires, asking practitioners to rate the relevance of each item from 1 (not essential) to 4 (highly essential;  = 21 and  = 10), and finalized the inventory a focus group interview with POD trainers ( = 4). In total, 76 items were included in the PODACI. A good consensus on the items was reached: the median score of the items was all above 3.00 (essential) and achieved an agreement level greater than 85%. The Kendall coordination coefficient W was 0.36 and 0.28 in the two questionnaires employed, indicating a fair level of agreement between participants.

DISCUSSION

The PODACI provides a way to measure attitudinal and competency factors related to the treatment integrity of POD as well as the efficacy of the training courses being offered. This highly enriched instrument opens up a wide range of possibilities for POD research and application, facilitating the development of Open Dialogue services. The next step is to assess the psychometric properties of the inventory.

摘要

引言

同伴支持的开放式对话(POD)是一种新型的精神卫生保健方法,目前正在英国实践和研究。为了成功实施POD,必须提供有效的培训,以确保受训人员做好准备,按预期实施该方法。因此,一种能够评估POD受训人员的发展和能力以及POD培训效果的特定工具至关重要。因此,本研究旨在建立一个名为同伴支持开放式对话能力清单(PODACI)的量表,以测量受训人员在培训前后属性和态度的变化。

方法与结果

为了生成该量表,采用了四轮改进的德尔菲法。我们首先通过广泛的文献综述和对从业者(n = 8)的个人访谈,确定了POD的基本和特定维度。生成条目后,我们通过两轮问卷调查进一步完善条目,要求从业者对每个条目的相关性从1(不重要)到4(非常重要)进行评分(n = 21和n = 10),并通过与POD培训师的焦点小组访谈(n = 4)最终确定该量表。PODACI总共包括76个条目。在条目上达成了良好的共识:条目的中位数得分均高于3.00(重要),达成一致水平超过85%。在使用的两份问卷中,肯德尔协调系数W分别为0.36和0.28,表明参与者之间的一致性处于中等水平。

讨论

PODACI提供了一种方法来测量与POD治疗完整性相关的态度和能力因素以及所提供培训课程的效果。这种高度丰富的工具为POD研究和应用开辟了广泛的可能性,促进了开放式对话服务的发展。下一步是评估该量表的心理测量特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee22/10097924/4b5a96dc45b9/fpsyg-14-1059103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee22/10097924/4b5a96dc45b9/fpsyg-14-1059103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee22/10097924/4b5a96dc45b9/fpsyg-14-1059103-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of the peer-supported open dialogue attitude and competence inventory for practitioners: A Delphi study.从业者同伴支持开放式对话态度与能力量表的编制:一项德尔菲研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 30;14:1059103. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1059103. eCollection 2023.
2
Peer-supported Open Dialogue: a thematic analysis of trainee perspectives on the approach and training.同伴支持的开放对话:学员对该方法和培训的看法的主题分析。
J Ment Health. 2019 Jun;28(3):312-318. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340609. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
3
Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care.同行支持的英国国民保健署开放对话:实施和评估一种新的精神卫生保健方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7.
4
The development and validation of the Person-centred Practice Inventory-Student instrument: A modified Delphi study.《以人为本实践量表-学生版》的编制与验证:改良德尔菲研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104826. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104826. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
5
Nurses' Empowerment Scale for ICU patients' families: an instrument development study.重症监护病房患者家属的护士赋权量表:一项工具开发研究。
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 Sep;21(5):e11-21. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12106. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
6
Becoming an Open Dialogue practitioner: a qualitative study of practitioners' training experiences and transitioning to practice.成为一名开放对话实践者:对实践者培训经历及向实践过渡的定性研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1432327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1432327. eCollection 2024.
7
Development of an instrument measuring Chinese adolescent beliefs and attitudes towards substance abuse.一种测量中国青少年对药物滥用的信念和态度的工具的开发。
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Sep;14(8):986-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01202.x.
8
Competency lists for urban general practitioners/family physicians using the modified Delphi method.使用改良 Delphi 法的城市全科医生/家庭医生能力清单。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jan 19;24(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01984-z.
9
Working Toward Consensus on Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Care: A Modified Delphi Study.致力于达成散发性前庭神经鞘瘤护理共识:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Dec;41(10):e1360-e1371. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002917.
10
Introducing Peer-supported Open Dialogue in changing mental health care.在不断变化的精神卫生保健中引入同伴支持的开放式对话。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;13:1056071. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056071. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing social cognition in psychosis - the potential role of open dialogue.增强精神病患者的社会认知——开放对话的潜在作用。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 5;11(1):84. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00608-y.
2
In Pursuit of Recovery: A Comparative Study of Stakeholder Perspectives on Outcomes of People with Psychosis.追求康复:关于精神病患者结局的利益相关者观点的比较研究
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Feb;61(2):300-313. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01399-9. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and refinement of the open dialog adherence protocol in complex mental health care.复杂精神卫生保健中开放式对话依从性协议的开发与完善
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 6;13:1041375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041375. eCollection 2022.
2
Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care.同行支持的英国国民保健署开放对话:实施和评估一种新的精神卫生保健方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7.
3
Open Dialogue compared to treatment as usual for adults experiencing a mental health crisis: Protocol for the ODDESSI multi-site cluster randomised controlled trial.
开放式对话与常规治疗对经历心理健康危机的成年人的比较:ODDESSI 多中心整群随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;113:106664. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106664. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
4
Reaching consensus on the principles of trauma-informed care in early intervention psychosis services: A Delphi study.创伤知情照护原则在早期精神病干预服务中达成共识:德尔菲研究。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;15(5):1369-1375. doi: 10.1111/eip.13068. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
Beyond polyphony: Open Dialogue in a Women's Shelter in Australia as a possibility for supporting violence-informed practice.超越复调:澳大利亚妇女收容所的开放对话,作为支持暴力知情实践的一种可能性。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2021 Jan;47(1):136-149. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12457. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
An Open Dialogue-informed approach to mental health service delivery: experiences of service users and support networks.一种基于开放对话的心理健康服务提供方式:服务使用者和支持网络的体验
J Ment Health. 2021 Aug;30(4):494-499. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1739238. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Implanting Rhizomes in Vermont: a Qualitative Study of How the Open Dialogue Approach was Adapted and Implemented.佛蒙特州的根茎植入:一项关于开放对话方法如何适应和实施的定性研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2020 Sep;91(3):681-693. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09732-7.
8
Developing a tool for measuring the disaster resilience of healthcare rescuers: a modified Delphi study.开发一种衡量医疗救援人员灾害应对能力的工具:一项修正后的德尔菲研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jan 20;28(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-0700-9.
9
Client, family, and clinician experiences of Open Dialogue-based services.患者、家属和临床医生对基于开放对话的服务的体验。
Psychol Serv. 2021 May;18(2):154-163. doi: 10.1037/ser0000404. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Open dialogue in the UK: qualitative study.英国的开放式对话:定性研究
BJPsych Open. 2019 Jul;5(4):e49. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.38.