End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Universiteit Gent, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Universiteit Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 29;11:1100353. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1100353. eCollection 2023.
In most jurisdictions where assisted dying practices are legal, attending physicians must consult another practitioner to assess the patient's eligibility. Consequently, in some jurisdictions, they can rely on the expertise of trained assisted dying consultants (trained consultants). However, these peer consultations remain under-researched. We examined the characteristics and outcomes of peer consultations to assess an assisted dying request with trained consultants, and explored how these characteristics influence the performance of assisted dying.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey in 2019-2020 in Belgium among attending physicians who had consulted a trained consultant for an assisted dying request assessment ( = 904).
The valid response rate was 56% (502/903). The vast majority of attending physicians (92%) who had consulted a trained consultant were general practitioners. In more than half of the consultations (57%), the patient was diagnosed with cancer. In 66%, the patient was aged 70 or older. Reported as the patients' most important reasons to request assisted dying: suffering without prospect of improving in 49% of the consultations, loss of dignity in 11%, pain in 9%, and tiredness of life in 9%. In the vast majority of consultations (85%), the attending physician consulted the trained consultant because of the expertise, and in nearly half of the consultations (46%) because of the independence. In more than nine out of ten consultations (91%), the consultant gave a positive advice: i.e., substantive requirements for assisted dying were met. Eight out of ten consultations were followed by assisted dying. The likelihood of assisted dying was higher in consultations in which loss of dignity, loss of independence in daily living, or general weakness or tiredness were reasons for the request.
Our findings indicate that the peer consultation practice with trained consultants is most often embedded in a primary care setting. Moreover, our study corroborates previous research in that assisted dying is performed relatively less frequently in patients with cancer and more often in patients with general deterioration. Our findings suggest that attending physicians hold peer consultations with trained consultants to endorse their own decision-making and to request additional support.
在大多数允许协助自杀实践的司法管辖区,主治医生必须咨询另一位医生来评估患者是否符合条件。因此,在一些司法管辖区,他们可以依赖受过培训的协助自杀顾问的专业知识(培训顾问)。然而,这些同行咨询仍然研究不足。我们检查了同行咨询的特征和结果,以评估接受培训的顾问对协助自杀请求的评估,并探讨了这些特征如何影响协助自杀的实施。
我们在 2019 年至 2020 年期间在比利时对主治医生进行了一项横断面调查,这些医生曾就协助自杀请求评估咨询过培训顾问(=904 人)。
有效回复率为 56%(502/903)。咨询过培训顾问的主治医生中,绝大多数(92%)是全科医生。在超过一半的咨询中(57%),患者被诊断患有癌症。在 66%的咨询中,患者年龄在 70 岁或以上。报告称患者请求协助自杀的最重要原因是:49%的咨询中存在无改善希望的痛苦,11%的咨询中存在失去尊严,9%的咨询中存在疼痛,9%的咨询中存在厌倦生活。在绝大多数咨询中(85%),主治医生咨询培训顾问是因为其专业知识,而在近一半的咨询中(46%)是因为其独立性。在超过十分之九的咨询中(91%),顾问给出了积极的建议:即,协助自杀的实质性要求得到满足。十分之八的咨询后进行了协助自杀。在因尊严丧失、日常生活独立性丧失或普遍虚弱或疲劳而提出请求的咨询中,协助自杀的可能性更高。
我们的研究结果表明,与培训顾问进行同行咨询的做法最常嵌入初级保健环境中。此外,我们的研究结果与先前的研究相吻合,即在癌症患者中协助自杀的实施相对较少,而在一般恶化的患者中则较多。我们的研究结果表明,主治医生与培训顾问进行同行咨询是为了支持他们自己的决策,并寻求额外的支持。