Suppr超能文献

什么因素影响全科医生进行盆腔检查?初级保健中的定性研究。

What influences GPs' use of pelvic examination? A qualitative investigation in primary care.

机构信息

Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen.

Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jun 29;73(732):e528-e536. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0363. Print 2023 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Omission of pelvic examination (PE) has been associated with diagnostic delay in women diagnosed with gynaecological cancer. However, PEs are often not carried out by GPs.

AIM

To determine the perceptions of GPs about the role of PEs, the barriers to and facilitators of PEs, and GPs' experience of PEs in practice.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative semi-structured interview study conducted in one health board in Scotland (mixed urban and rural) with an approximate population of 500 000.

METHOD

Interviews were conducted face-to-face or by telephone between March and June 2019. Framework analysis used the COM-B behaviour change model concepts of capability, opportunity, and motivation.

RESULTS

Data was compatible with all three domains of the COM-B framework. Capability related to training in and maintenance of skills. These went beyond carrying out the examination to interpreting it reliably. Opportunity related to the clinical environment and the provision of chaperones for intimate examination. Interviewees described a range of motivations towards or against PEs that were unrelated to either capability or opportunity. These all related to providing high-quality care, but this was defined in different ways: 'doing what is best for the individual', 'doctors examine', and 'GPs as pragmatists'.

CONCLUSION

GPs' reasons for carrying out, or not carrying out, PEs in women with symptoms potentially indicating cancer are complex. The COM-B framework provides a way of understanding this complexity. Interventions to increase the use of PEs, and critics of its non-use, need to consider these multiple factors.

摘要

背景

盆腔检查(PE)的遗漏与妇科癌症诊断的延迟有关。然而,通常不是全科医生进行 PEs。

目的

确定全科医生对 PEs 作用的看法、PEs 的障碍和促进因素,以及全科医生在实践中进行 PEs 的经验。

设计和设置

在苏格兰一个拥有约 500000 人口的混合城市和农村的卫生委员会进行的定性半结构式访谈研究。

方法

2019 年 3 月至 6 月期间进行了面对面或电话访谈。采用框架分析法,使用 COM-B 行为改变模型的能力、机会和动机概念。

结果

数据与 COM-B 框架的所有三个领域都兼容。能力与技能的培训和维持有关。这些技能不仅包括进行检查,还包括可靠地解释检查结果。机会与临床环境和为亲密检查提供陪同人员有关。受访者描述了对 PEs 的一系列支持或反对的动机,这些动机与能力或机会无关。这些都与提供高质量的护理有关,但这有不同的定义:“为个人做最好的事”、“医生检查”和“全科医生是实用主义者”。

结论

全科医生对有症状的女性进行或不进行 PEs 的原因很复杂。COM-B 框架提供了一种理解这种复杂性的方法。为增加 PEs 的使用而进行的干预措施,以及对其未使用的批评,需要考虑这些多种因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验