• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑志愿者对 diazepam 无偏好。

Lack of preference for diazepam in anxious volunteers.

作者信息

de Wit H, Uhlenhuth E H, Hedeker D, McCracken S G, Johanson C E

出版信息

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Jun;43(6):533-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800060023004.

DOI:10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800060023004
PMID:3707286
Abstract

Using a choice procedure, these experiments tested whether diazepam is more highly preferred by anxious subjects than by normal control subjects. Subjects first sampled and then chose between two capsules containing diazepam (5 or 10 mg) and placebo, or amphetamine (5 mg) and placebo. The number of times each drug was chosen over placebo and the subjective effects of the drugs were measured. Anxious subjects did not differ from controls in their drug choices. Most subjects chose diazepam less often than placebo, especially at the higher dose, whereas they chose amphetamine more often than placebo. The subjective drug effects (including anxiety reduction after diazepam) were similar for anxious and nonanxious subjects, despite predrug differences in anxiety. The results suggest that individuals with high anxiety are not at greater risk for dependence on antianxiety drugs.

摘要

通过选择程序,这些实验测试了焦虑受试者是否比正常对照受试者更倾向于选择地西泮。受试者首先对两种胶囊进行采样,然后在含有地西泮(5或10毫克)和安慰剂的胶囊,或含有苯丙胺(5毫克)和安慰剂的胶囊之间进行选择。测量了每种药物被选择超过安慰剂的次数以及药物的主观效果。焦虑受试者在药物选择上与对照组没有差异。大多数受试者选择地西泮的频率低于安慰剂,尤其是在高剂量时,而他们选择苯丙胺的频率高于安慰剂。尽管用药前焦虑程度存在差异,但焦虑和非焦虑受试者的药物主观效果(包括地西泮后焦虑减轻)相似。结果表明,高焦虑个体对抗焦虑药物产生依赖的风险并不更高。

相似文献

1
Lack of preference for diazepam in anxious volunteers.焦虑志愿者对 diazepam 无偏好。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Jun;43(6):533-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800060023004.
2
Preference for diazepam in anxious adults.焦虑成年人对安定的偏好。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Jun;10(3):190-6.
3
Drug preference and mood in humans: diazepam.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(3):269-73. doi: 10.1007/BF00433061.
4
Drug preference in normal volunteers: effects of age and time of day.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;87(2):186-93. doi: 10.1007/BF00431805.
5
Preferences for ethanol and diazepam in anxious individuals: an evaluation of the self-medication hypothesis.焦虑个体对乙醇和地西泮的偏好:自我药疗假说的评估
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Sep;121(1):91-103. doi: 10.1007/BF02245595.
6
Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam.苯丙胺和地西泮强化作用及主观效应的个体差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1986 Feb;16(4):341-60. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(86)90068-2.
7
Drug preference in humans: double-blind choice comparison of pentobarbital, diazepam and placebo.人类的药物偏好:戊巴比妥、地西泮与安慰剂的双盲选择比较
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1980 Dec;215(3):649-61.
8
Psychomotor effects of diazepam in anxious patients and healthy volunteers.地西泮对焦虑患者和健康志愿者的精神运动效应。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1983 Apr;3(2):88-96.
9
Relationship between subjective effects and drug preferences: ethanol and diazepam.主观效应与药物偏好之间的关系:乙醇和地西泮。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1994 Feb;34(3):243-51. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(94)90163-5.
10
Reinforcing effects of diazepam under anxiogenic conditions in individuals with social anxiety.地西泮在社交焦虑个体的致焦虑条件下的强化作用。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Nov;13(4):348-356. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.13.4.348.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and correlates of the misuse of z-drugs and benzodiazepines in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.《全国药物使用和健康调查》中Z类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物滥用的流行情况及其相关因素
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 9;14:1129447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1129447. eCollection 2023.
2
Sleep and alertness disturbance and substance use disorders: A bi-directional relation.睡眠和警觉性障碍与物质使用障碍:双向关系。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2021 Apr;203:173153. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173153. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
3
Stability of acute responses to drugs in humans across repeated testing: Findings with alcohol and amphetamine.
人类对药物急性反应的稳定性在多次测试中的表现:酒精和安非他命的研究结果。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jul 1;212:107989. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107989. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
4
Long-Term Use of Benzodiazepines: Implications and guidelines.苯二氮䓬类药物的长期使用:影响因素与指南
Can Fam Physician. 1992 Jan;38:149-53.
5
A within-subject assessment of the discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects of self-administered cocaine in rhesus monkeys.恒河猴自我给药可卡因的辨别性刺激和强化作用的受试者内评估。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Apr;203(2):343-53. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1322-5. Epub 2008 Sep 21.
6
Assessing methylphenidate preference in ADHD patients using a choice procedure.使用选择程序评估多动症患者对哌甲酯的偏好。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Oct;175(4):391-8. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1838-2.
7
Pharmacokinetic changes in the elderly. Do they contribute to drug abuse and dependence?老年人的药代动力学变化。它们会导致药物滥用和依赖吗?
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Nov;31(5):372-85. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199631050-00004.
8
Hypnotic self administration and dose escalation.催眠药物的自我服用与剂量递增。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Sep;127(2):150-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02805988.
9
Preference for diazepam, but not buspirone, in moderate drinkers.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jan;123(2):154-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02246172.
10
Preferences for ethanol and diazepam in anxious individuals: an evaluation of the self-medication hypothesis.焦虑个体对乙醇和地西泮的偏好:自我药疗假说的评估
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Sep;121(1):91-103. doi: 10.1007/BF02245595.