• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度智力障碍或边缘智力青少年及年轻成人进行日常监测的可行性。

The feasibility of daily monitoring in adolescents and young adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.

机构信息

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Pluryn Research & Development, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul;36(4):847-858. doi: 10.1111/jar.13102. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1111/jar.13102
PMID:37073448
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the limitations of young persons with a mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning preclude feasibility of the daily diary method.

METHOD

For 60 consecutive days, 50 participants (M  = 21.4, 56% male) who receive care in an ambulatory, residential, or juvenile detention setting, self-rated both standardised and personalised diary questions through an app. Diary entries were used for feedback in treatment. Interviews were used to explore acceptability.

RESULTS

Average compliance was 70.4%, while 26% of participants dropped out. Compliance was good in ambulatory (88.9%) and residential care (75.6%), but not in the juvenile detention setting (19.4%). The content of self-selected diary items varied widely. Participants deemed the method acceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Daily monitoring is feasible for individuals with a mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning receiving ambulatory or residential care, and can provide scientists and practitioners with important insights into day-to-day behavioural patterns.

摘要

背景

轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能的年轻人是否存在局限性,以至于无法使用日常日记法,目前尚不清楚。

方法

在连续 60 天的时间里,50 名参与者(平均年龄 21.4 岁,56%为男性)通过应用程序对标准化和个性化的日记问题进行自我评估,他们在日间、住宿或少年拘留环境中接受护理。日记条目被用于治疗中的反馈。访谈被用来探索可接受性。

结果

平均遵守率为 70.4%,但有 26%的参与者退出。日间(88.9%)和住宿护理(75.6%)的遵守情况良好,但少年拘留环境中(19.4%)的遵守情况不佳。自我选择的日记项目的内容差异很大。参与者认为该方法是可以接受的。

结论

日常监测对于接受日间或住宿护理的轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能的个体来说是可行的,并且可以为科学家和从业者提供有关日常行为模式的重要见解。

相似文献

1
The feasibility of daily monitoring in adolescents and young adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.轻度智力障碍或边缘智力青少年及年轻成人进行日常监测的可行性。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul;36(4):847-858. doi: 10.1111/jar.13102. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Longitudinal and Combined Smartwatch and Ecological Momentary Assessment in Racially Diverse Older Adults: Feasibility, Adherence, and Acceptability Study.种族多样化的老年人中智能手表与生态瞬时评估的纵向及联合研究:可行性、依从性和可接受性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 8;12:e69952. doi: 10.2196/69952.
3
Behavioural and cognitive-behavioural interventions for outwardly directed aggressive behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities.针对智障人士外向攻击行为的行为和认知行为干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 6;2(2):CD003406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003406.pub5.
4
Mobile health (m-health) smartphone interventions for adolescents and adults with overweight or obesity.移动健康(m-health)智能手机干预措施用于超重或肥胖的青少年和成年人。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 20;2(2):CD013591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013591.pub2.
5
A Mobile Ecological Momentary Intervention for Reducing Experiential Avoidance in the Context of Rumination: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一种用于减少反刍情境下经验性回避的移动生态瞬时干预:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 27;14:e66067. doi: 10.2196/66067.
6
Leisure Participation of Autistic Adults: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Feasibility Study.自闭症成年人的休闲参与:生态瞬时评估可行性研究。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2023 Jul 1;128(4):319-333. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-128.4.319.
7
Psychological therapies (remotely delivered) for the management of chronic and recurrent pain in children and adolescents.用于治疗儿童和青少年慢性复发性疼痛的心理疗法(远程提供)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 23;3(3):CD011118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011118.pub2.
8
Eliciting perceptions of satisfaction with services and supports from persons with intellectual disability and developmental disabilities: a review of the literature.获取智力残疾和发育障碍者对服务与支持的满意度认知:文献综述
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Dec;58(12):1141-55. doi: 10.1111/jir.12114. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
9
Secure care hospital evaluation of manualised interpersonal art-psychotherapy (SCHEMA): A randomised controlled trial protocol.安全护理医院对手动人际艺术心理治疗的评估(SCHEMA):一项随机对照试验方案。
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Mar 7;5:21. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13801.1. eCollection 2025.
10
Assessment of the Acceptability and Feasibility of Using Mobile Robotic Systems for Patient Evaluation.使用移动机器人系统进行患者评估的可接受性和可行性评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e210667. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0667.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Frontiers of Technology in Forensic Psychiatric Youth Care: Ethical Challenges.探索法医精神病学青少年护理中的技术前沿:伦理挑战。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01358-2.
2
Prevalence and Course of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents With a Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disability, Inside and Outside Residential Treatment.轻度至边缘智力障碍青少年在住院治疗内外的焦虑和抑郁症状患病率及病程
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 Jul;69(7):592-604. doi: 10.1111/jir.13242. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
3
A systematic review of ecological momentary assessment in autism research.
自闭症研究中生态瞬时评估的系统评价。
Autism. 2024 Dec 18;29(6):13623613241305722. doi: 10.1177/13623613241305722.
4
A complex systems perspective on chronic aggression and self-injury: case study of a woman with mild intellectual disability and borderline personality disorder.从复杂系统视角看慢性攻击和自伤行为:一位轻度智力障碍伴边缘型人格障碍女性的个案研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 21;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05836-7.