Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Postbus 9104, Nijmegen, 6500 HE, The Netherlands.
Pluryn Research & Development, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 21;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05836-7.
Challenging behaviors like aggression and self-injury are dangerous for clients and staff in residential care. These behaviors are not well understood and therefore often labeled as "complex". Yet it remains vague what this supposed complexity entails at the individual level. This case-study used a three-step mixed-methods analytical strategy, inspired by complex systems theory. First, we construed a holistic summary of relevant factors in her daily life. Second, we described her challenging behavioral trajectory by identifying stable phases. Third, instability and extraordinary events in her environment were evaluated as potential change-inducing mechanisms between different phases.
A woman, living at a residential facility, diagnosed with mild intellectual disability and borderline personality disorder, who shows a chronic pattern of aggressive and self-injurious incidents. She used ecological momentary assessments to self-rate challenging behaviors daily for 560 days.
A qualitative summary of caretaker records revealed many internal and environmental factors relevant to her daily life. Her clinician narrowed these down to 11 staff hypothesized risk- and protective factors, such as reliving trauma, experiencing pain, receiving medical care or compliments. Coercive measures increased the chance of challenging behavior the day after and psychological therapy sessions decreased the chance of self-injury the day after. The majority of contemporaneous and lagged associations between these 11 factors and self-reported challenging behaviors were non-significant, indicating that challenging behaviors are not governed by mono-causal if-then relations, speaking to its complex nature. Despite this complexity there were patterns in the temporal ordering of incidents. Aggression and self-injury occurred on respectively 13% and 50% of the 560 days. On this timeline 11 distinct stable phases were identified that alternated between four unique states: high levels of aggression and self-injury, average aggression and self-injury, low aggression and self-injury, and low aggression with high self-injury. Eight out of ten transitions between phases were triggered by extraordinary events in her environment, or preceded by increased fluctuations in her self-ratings, or a combination of these two. Desirable patterns emerged more often and were less easily malleable, indicating that when she experiences bad times, keeping in mind that better times lie ahead is hopeful and realistic.
攻击和自残等挑战性行为对居住护理机构的客户和工作人员构成危险。这些行为尚未得到充分理解,因此通常被贴上“复杂”的标签。然而,个体层面的这种复杂性究竟意味着什么仍然很模糊。本案例研究使用了一种三步混合方法分析策略,灵感来自复杂系统理论。首先,我们构建了她日常生活中相关因素的整体概述。其次,我们通过确定稳定阶段来描述她具有挑战性的行为轨迹。最后,评估她环境中的不稳定性和特殊事件是否是不同阶段之间的潜在变化诱导机制。
一名女性,住在住宅设施中,被诊断患有轻度智力残疾和边缘型人格障碍,表现出慢性攻击和自残行为模式。她使用生态瞬时评估(Ecological Momentary Assessment,EMA)技术,每天自我评估 560 天的挑战性行为。
护理人员记录的定性总结揭示了许多与她日常生活相关的内部和环境因素。她的临床医生将这些因素缩小到 11 名工作人员假设的风险和保护因素,例如重现创伤、经历疼痛、接受医疗护理或赞美。强制措施会增加第二天出现挑战性行为的机会,而心理治疗会降低第二天出现自残的机会。这 11 个因素与自我报告的挑战性行为之间的大多数同时和滞后关联均无统计学意义,这表明挑战性行为不受单一因果关系的支配,如果有则说明其具有复杂的性质。尽管如此,事件的时间顺序仍存在模式。攻击行为和自残行为分别发生在 560 天中的 13%和 50%。在这个时间轴上,确定了 11 个独特的稳定阶段,它们在四个独特状态之间交替:高攻击性和自残、平均攻击性和自残、低攻击性和自残、低攻击性和高自残。十个阶段转换中有八个是由环境中的特殊事件触发的,或者是在自我评估的波动增加之前发生的,或者是两者的结合。当她经历困难时期时,更频繁地出现理想的模式,并且更不容易改变,这表明记住前方有更好的时光是充满希望和现实的。