Copeland S R, Luckasson R, Shauger R
Department of Educational Specialties, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Dec;58(12):1141-55. doi: 10.1111/jir.12114. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
Assessing the perceptions of individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and developmental disabilities (DD) is an essential part of evaluating and planning services and an important component of respect for self-direction and autonomy. It can be difficult, however, to assess satisfaction in such a way that individuals with disabilities' actual perceptions of satisfaction are accurately represented because of intellectual and communication difficulties they may have, the restricted range and nature of service systems, and the limitations of strategies used by some researchers.
The purpose of this literature review was to systematically examine research studies designed to solicit personal satisfaction information from individuals with ID and DD. We reviewed 29 studies that met inclusion criteria to determine (1) who were participants in the studies, (2) what processes researchers used to obtain opinions and perspectives of persons with ID and DD, and (3) how researchers ensured the credibility, accuracy and voluntariness of participants' responses.
Findings revealed that most of the research participants had ID with higher IQs and limited needs for supports. Researchers utilised a variety of processes to elicit perceptions of satisfaction. Most studies employed individual interviews; researchers addressed comprehensibility of questions in a number of ways (e.g. use of visuals, adjusting wording of questions, providing clear examples). Few studies reported training interviewers or taking into account participants' primary language or cultural background. No studies reported educating participants about how to understand the satisfaction information data or how to use it in advocating for more appropriate supports.
Assessing the satisfaction with supports and services of individuals with ID and DD is complex particularly for persons with extensive support needs. Continued research using varied conceptual frameworks and new technologies is needed. Also helpful will be teaching persons with disabilities about the assessment process and how to use its results.
评估智力残疾(ID)和发育障碍(DD)患者的看法是评估和规划服务的重要组成部分,也是尊重自我导向和自主权的重要内容。然而,由于他们可能存在的智力和沟通困难、服务系统的范围和性质受限以及一些研究人员使用的策略存在局限性,很难以准确反映残疾人士实际满意度看法的方式来评估满意度。
本系统文献综述的目的是系统审查旨在从智力残疾和发育障碍患者那里获取个人满意度信息的研究。我们审查了29项符合纳入标准的研究,以确定:(1)研究的参与者是谁;(2)研究人员使用了哪些过程来获取智力残疾和发育障碍患者的意见和观点;(3)研究人员如何确保参与者回答的可信度、准确性和自愿性。
研究结果显示,大多数研究参与者为智商较高且支持需求有限的智力残疾者。研究人员采用了多种过程来引出满意度看法。大多数研究采用个人访谈;研究人员通过多种方式解决问题的可理解性(例如使用视觉辅助、调整问题措辞、提供清晰示例)。很少有研究报告对访谈者进行培训或考虑参与者的主要语言或文化背景。没有研究报告向参与者说明如何理解满意度信息数据或如何在争取更适当支持时使用这些数据。
评估智力残疾和发育障碍患者对支持和服务的满意度很复杂,特别是对于支持需求广泛的患者。需要使用不同概念框架和新技术继续开展研究。向残疾人士传授评估过程以及如何使用评估结果也会有所帮助。