Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e238306. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8306.
A recent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine study found that transplant outcomes varied greatly based on multiple factors, including race, ethnicity, and geographic location. They proposed a number of recommendations including studying opportunities to improve equity in organ allocation.
To evaluate the role of donor and recipient socioeconomic position and region as a mediator of observed racial and ethnic differences in posttransplant survival.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included lung transplant donors and recipients with race and ethnicity information and a zip code tabulation area-defined area deprivation index (ADI) from September 1, 2011, to September 1, 2021, whose data were in the US transplant registry. Data were analyzed from June to December 2022.
Race, neighborhood disadvantage, and region of donors and recipients.
Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to study the association of donor and recipient race with ADI on posttransplant survival. Kaplan-Meier method estimation was performed by donor and recipient ADI. Generalized linear models by race were fit, and mediation analysis was performed. Bayesian conditional autoregressive Poisson rate models (1, state-level spatial random effects; 2, model 1 with fixed effects for race and ethnicity, 3; model 2 excluding region; and 4: model 1 with fixed effects for US region) were used to characterize variation in posttransplant mortality and compared using ratios of mortality rates to the national average.
Overall, 19 504 lung transplant donors (median [IQR] age, 33 [23-46] years; 3117 [16.0%] Hispanic individuals, 3667 [18.8%] non-Hispanic Black individuals, and 11 935 [61.2%] non-Hispanic White individuals) and recipients (median [IQR] age, 60 [51-66] years; 1716 [8.8%] Hispanic individuals, 1861 [9.5%] non-Hispanic Black individuals, and 15 375 [78.8%] non-Hispanic White individuals) were included. ADI did not mediate the difference in posttransplant survival between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White recipients; it mediated only 4.1% of the survival difference between non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic recipients. Spatial analysis revealed the increased risk of posttransplant death among non-Hispanic Black recipients may be associated with region of residence.
In this cohort study of lung transplant donors and recipients, socioeconomic position and region of residence did not explain most of the difference in posttransplant outcomes among racial and ethnic groups, which may be due to the highly selected nature of the pretransplant population. Further research should evaluate other potentially mediating effects contributing to inequity in posttransplant survival.
最近,美国国家科学院、工程院和医学研究院的一项研究发现,移植结果因多种因素而有很大差异,包括种族、族裔和地理位置。他们提出了一些建议,包括研究改善器官分配公平性的机会。
评估供体和受体的社会经济地位和地区作为观察到的种族和族裔差异在移植后生存中的中介作用。
设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了 2011 年 9 月 1 日至 2021 年 9 月 1 日期间有种族和族裔信息以及邮政编码区定义的区域剥夺指数(ADI)的肺移植供体和受体,其数据来自美国移植登记处。数据分析于 2022 年 6 月至 12 月进行。
供体和受体的种族、邻里劣势和地区。
使用单变量和多变量 Cox 比例风险回归来研究供体和受体种族与 ADI 对移植后生存的关联。通过供体和受体 ADI 进行 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计。按种族拟合广义线性模型,并进行中介分析。使用贝叶斯条件自回归泊松率模型(1,州级空间随机效应;2,包含种族和族裔固定效应的模型 1;3,排除区域的模型 2;和 4:包含美国区域固定效应的模型 1)来描述移植后死亡率的变化,并使用死亡率与全国平均水平的比率进行比较。
总体而言,纳入了 19504 名肺移植供体(中位数[IQR]年龄,33[23-46]岁;3117[16.0%]西班牙裔个体,3667[18.8%]非西班牙裔黑人个体和 11935[61.2%]非西班牙裔白人个体)和受体(中位数[IQR]年龄,60[51-66]岁;1716[8.8%]西班牙裔个体,1861[9.5%]非西班牙裔黑人个体和 15375[78.8%]非西班牙裔白人个体)。ADI 并没有中介非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人受体之间移植后生存差异;它仅中介了非西班牙裔黑人和西班牙裔受体之间 4.1%的生存差异。空间分析显示,非西班牙裔黑人受体移植后死亡的风险增加可能与居住地区有关。
在这项肺移植供体和受体的队列研究中,社会经济地位和居住地区并不能解释不同种族和族裔群体之间移植后结局的大部分差异,这可能是由于移植前人群的高度选择性。应进一步研究其他可能导致移植后生存不公平的潜在中介效应。